Personal Strengths of Russian Teachers in VIA Model: Approbation of the Russian-Language Version of the Questionnaire “Values in Action Inventory of Strengths” (VIA – IS120)

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Positive psychology is one of the most rapidly developing directions of psychological science in the world. Over the past two decades, a large number of empirical researches confirm effectiveness and validity of theoretical studies and practical methods used in the framework of positive psychology. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research in this area in the Russian-speaking scientific community, despite of the presence of high-level scientific teams and individual researchers working in the framework of positive psychology. Probably an important factor in the “low popularity” of positive psychology among Russian authors is the lack of large-scale studies on wide samples of Russian respondents. The purpose of this article is to empirically confirm, the legitimacy of the practical application of the “VIA” model. As well as perform approbation, validation and publication of the Russian-language version of the questionnaire by K. Peterson and M. Seligman “Values in Action Inventory of Strengths” in Russian we suggest more reflecting the essence of the questionnaire name – “24 strengths of the personality”.

Materials and Methods. The approbation was carried out on a wide sample of respondents from the professional sphere of education (N = 7 946), using statistical methods for checking the reliability of the questionnaire, including convergent validity and confirmatory factor analysis.
Results. The reliability tests showed significant validity results, indicating the reliability of the psychometric tool. The scales of the Russian-language version of the VIA-IS questionnaire show more than sufficient internal consistency, The convergent validity test showed significant correlations with the following scales: Life Satisfaction Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, General Self-Efficiency Scale, and Professional Burnout (Maslach’s). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the factorial structure of the questionnaire. We manage to meet the desirable “cut-off” model fit parameters of Confirmatory factor analysis.
Discussion and Conclusion. Hopefully, publication of this Russian-language questionnaire will lead to an increase interest for research in the field of positive psychology in the Russian scientific community. The conclusions made by the authors contribute to the development of theoretical concepts of positive psychology, confirming the general structural integrity and practical validity of the model “VIA”. Moreover, this article provides for open use in the Russian scientific psychological community a universal psychometric technique in form of questionnaire with empirically proven reliability on a wide sample of respondents.

About the authors

Alexey A. Stavtsev

Moscow Pedagogical State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: stavtsev.alex@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7299-5017
Scopus Author ID: 57219288519

Research Analyst of the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior Research, Assistant of the Department of Psychology of Education and Prevention of Deviant Behavior

Russian Federation, 1/1 Malaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow 119991

Arthur A. Rean

Moscow Pedagogical State University

Email: aa.rean@mpgu.su
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1107-9530
Scopus Author ID: 6507072773
ResearcherId: A-5349-2015

Head of the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior Research, Head of the Department of Psychology of Education and Prevention of Deviant Behavior, Chairman of the Scientific Coordination Council of the Russian Academy of Education (RAO) on Family and Childhood Issues, Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Education

Russian Federation, 1/1 Malaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow 119991

Roman G. Kuzmin

Moscow Pedagogical State University

Email: rg.kuzmin@mpgu.su
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8851-5313

Research Analyst of the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior Research, Assistant of the Department of Psychology of Education and Prevention of Deviant Behavior

Russian Federation, 1/1 Malaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow 119991

References

  1. Seligman M.E. Positive Psychology: A Personal History. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2019;15:1-23. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
  2. Burovikhina I.A., Leontiev D.A., Osin E.N. [The Forces of Nature as a Resource of the Teenager’s Personality:The Questionnaire “The Profile of Personal Merits”]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika = Psychological Diagnostics. 2007; (1):107-127. Available at: https://rsfdgrc.hse.ru/data/2010/08/11/1224866458/Буровихина Леонтьев Осин 2007.pdf (accessed 29.06.2021). (In Russ.)
  3. Bachik M.A.K., Carey G., Craighead W.E. VIA Character Strengths among US College Students and Their Associations with Happiness, Well-Being, Resiliency, Academic Success and Psychopathology. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021; 16(4):512-525. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1752785
  4. Linley P.A., Maltby J., Wood A.M., Joseph S., Harrington S., Petersone C., Seligman M.E.P. Character Strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;43(2):341-351. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004
  5. Otake K., Shimai S., Ikemi A., Utsuki N., Peterson C., Seligman M.E. Development of the Japanese Version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS). Japanese Journal of Psychology. 2005; 76(5):461-467.(In Japan, abstract in Eng.) doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.4992/jjpsy.76.461
  6. Azañedo C.M., Fernández-Abascal E.G., Barraca J. Character Strengths in Spain: Validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish Sample. Clínica y Salud. 2014; 25(2):123-130. (In Eng.)doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clysa.2014.06.002
  7. Brdar I., Kashda T.B. Character Strengths and Well-Being in Croatia: An Empirical Investigation of Structure and Correlates. Journal of Research in Personality. 2010; 44(1):151-154. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001
  8. Khumalo I.P., Wissing M.P., Temane Q.M. Exploring the Validity of the Values-in-Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in an African Context. Journal of Psychology in Africa. 2008; 18(1):133-142. (In Eng.) doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2008.10820180
  9. Singh K., Choubisa R. Empirical Validation of Values in Action-Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian Context. Psychological Studies. 2010; 55(2):151-158. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0015-4
  10. Ruch W., Huber A., Beermann U., Proyer R.T. Character Strengths as Predictors of the “Good Life” in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. In: Romanian Academy; Social Research. Studies and Researches in Social Sciences. Romania: Academia Română; 2007. p. 123-131. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3648
  11. Macdonald C., Bore M., Munro D. Values in Action Scale and the Big 5: An Empirical Indication of Structure. Journal of Research in Personality. 2008; 42(4):787-799. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003
  12. Shryack J., Steger M.F., Krueger R.F., Kallie C.S. The Structure of Virtue: An Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Virtues in Action Inventory of Strengths. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;48(6):714-719. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007
  13. McGrath R.E. Integrating Psychological and Cultural Perspectives on Virtue: The Hierarchical Structure of Character Strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2015; 10(5):407-424. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222
  14. McGrath R.E. Refining Our Understanding of the VIA Classification: Reflections on Papers by Han,Miller, and Snow. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2019; 14(1):41-50. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1528382
  15. Ng V., Cao M., Marsh H.W., Tay L., Seligman M.E.P. The Factor Structure of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): An Item-Level Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Bifactor Analysis.Psychological Assessment. 2017; 29(8):1053-1058. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000396
  16. Feraco T., Casali N., Meneghetti C. Do Strengths Converge into Virtues? An Item-, Virtue-, and Scale-Level Analysis of the Italian Values in Action Inventory of Strengths-120. Journal of Personality Assessment.2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1934481
  17. Partsch M.V., Bluemke M., Lechner C.M. Revisiting the Hierarchical Structure of the 24 VIA Character Strengths: Three Global Dimensions May Suffice to Capture Their Essence. European Journal of Personality.2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211017760
  18. Ruch W., Gander F., Wagner L., Giuliani F. The Structure of Character: On the Relationships between Character Strengths and Virtues. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021; 16(1):116-128. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1689418
  19. McGrath R.E., Wallace N. Cross-Validation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths-Revised and Its Short Forms. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2021; 103(1):120-131. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1705465
  20. Vylobkova V., Heintz S., Gander F., Wagner L., Ruch W. Convergence and Psychometric Properties of Character Strengths Measures: The VIA-IS and the VIA-IS-R. PsyArXiv Preprint. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8zvjb
  21. Yakushko O., Blodgett E. Negative Reflections about Positive Psychology: On Constraining the Field to a Focus on Happiness and Personal Achievement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2021; 61(1):104-131.(In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818794551
  22. Gander F., Wagner L., Amann L., Ruch W. What are Character Strengths Good for? A Daily Diary Study on Character Strengths Enactment. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1926532
  23. Haslip M.J., Donaldson L. What Character Strengths Do Early Childhood Educators Use to Address Workplace Challenges? Positive Psychology in Teacher Professional Development. International Journal of Early Years Education. 2021; 29(3):250-267. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1893666
  24. Francis J., Vella-Brodrick D., Chyuan-Chin T. Effectiveness of Online, School-Based Positive Psychology Interventions to Improve Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Wellbeing.2021; 11(4):44-67. Available at: https://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/1465 (accessed 25.06.2021). (In Eng.)
  25. Shaygan M., Sheybani Negad S., Motazedian S. The Effect of Combined Sertraline and Positive Psychotherapy on Hopelessness and Suicidal Ideation among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1913636
  26. Casali N., Feraco T., Ghisi M., Meneghetti C. “Andràtutto bene”: Associations between Character Strengths, Psychological Distress and Self-Efficacy during COVID-19 Lockdown. Journal of Happiness Studies.2021; 22:2255-2274. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00321-w
  27. Rean A.A., Stavtsev A.A. Positive Psychological Interventions to Prevent Well-Being Issues, Aggression and Bullying in School Students. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. 2020; (3):37-59. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-3-37-59
  28. Rean A.A., Stavtsev A.A. Protective and Provocative Family Factors of Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya = Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2021; 11(2):137-149. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.202
  29. Bashkatov S.A. Adaptation of a Shortened Version of Peterson and Seligman’s Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) with a Russian-Language Sample. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya:Psikhologiya i pedagogika = RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2020; 17(4):738-754. (In Russ.,abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-4-738-754
  30. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Osin E.N. Diagnostics of Dispositional Optimism: Validity and Reliability of Russian Version of LOT-R. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021; 18(1):34-55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-34-55
  31. Bokhan T.G., Galazhinsky E.V., Leontiev D.A., Rasskazova E.I., Terekhina O.V., Ulyanich A.L., Shabalovskaya M.V., Bogomaz S.A., Vidyakina T.A. COVID-19 and Subjective Well-Being: Perceived Impact, Positive Psychological Resources and Protective Behavior. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ehkonomiki = Psychology.Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021; 18(2):259-275. (In Eng., abstract in Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-2-259-275
  32. Diamond M.R., O’Brien-Malone A., Woodworth R.J. Scoring the VIA Survey of Character. Psychological Reports. 2010; 107(3):833-836. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/02.07.09.PR0.107.6.833-836
  33. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1985; 49(1):71-75. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  34. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Brief Russian Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well Being: Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis. Monitoring obshestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2020;(1):117-142. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06
  35. Shvartser R., Jerusalem M., Romek V. [The Russian Version of Self-Efficacy Scale of R. Schwarzer and М. Jerusalem]. Inostrannaya psikhologiya = Foreign Psychology. 1996; (7):71-76. Available at: http://www.romek.ru/ru/node/31 (accessed 29.06.2021). (In Russ.)
  36. Maslach C., Jackson S.E., Leiter M.P., Schaufeli W.B., Schwab R.L. Maslach Burnout Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press. 1986; 21:3463-3464. (In Eng.)
  37. Schwarzer R., Hallum S. Perceived Teacher Self‐Efficacy as a Predictor of Job Stress and Burnout:Mediation Analyses. Applied Psychology. 2008; 57(s1):152-171. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x
  38. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. Evaluating Model Fit: A Synthesis of the Structural Equation Modelling Literature. In: 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies.London, United Kingdom; 2008. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
  39. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to under Parameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods. 1998; 3(4):424-453. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  40. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999; 6(1):1-55. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2026 Stavtsev A.A., Rean A.A., Kuzmin R.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

We use cookies and Yandex.Metrica to improve the Site and for good user experience. By continuing to use this Site, you confirm that you have been informed about this and agree to our personal data processing rules.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).