A Year after the Outbreak of COVID-19: Applicants’ Perception of Higher Education Quality in the Context of Digitalization and Blended Learning

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The forced transition of Russian universities to distance learning in 2020 and accelerated digital transformation of educational processes in higher education are the first effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. A key aspect of measuring higher education quality is the perception of its formats by students as university change agents. The aim of the study is to identify the factors that determine the applicants’ positive attitude to learning that includes online elements in the context of the Russian universities’ transition to the blended learning model.
Materials and Methods. The empirical base of the research includes the results of an online sociological survey conducted among the applicants for Ural Federal University undergraduate and graduate programmes in 2021. The methods of classification, factor analysis, and coefficients of pair correlations were applied. Additionally, for comparison, data from 2015 for a similar sample (1st year bachelor’s degree students) were used.
Results. Positive attitudes towards online and blended learning are gradually increasing. The factor analysis of data from 2021 showed that applicants who support the online and blended learning include: those aspiring for master’s degree upon completing their bachelor’s degree course; those who choose their degree field rationally – men who apply for a state-funded education in any Russian university (including participants of federal contests – ‘Academic Olympics’). The above groups are formed mainly under the influence of external factors. Another group includes those oriented towards self-realization – women who choose their degree field relying on their personal inclinations for a future profession (the influence of internal factors).
Discussion and Conclusion. The research results contribute to the development of scientific ideas about the blended learning model and emphasize the value of institutional research based on feedback from university students for making informed management decisions on change. The materials of the paper will be useful when designing the educational process in the Russian universities’ transition to the blended learning model.

About the authors

Gavriil A. Agarkov

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Email: g.a.agarkov@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6533-3557
Scopus Author ID: 56582108700
ResearcherId: R-7920-2016

Head of Research Laboratory for University Development Issues,Dr.Sci. (Econ.), Professor

Russian Federation, 19 Prospekt Mira, Ekaterinburg 620002

Daniil G. Sandler

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Email: d.g.sandler@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5641-6596
Scopus Author ID: 56581474400

Leading Researcher, Research Laboratory for University Development Issues, Cand.Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, 19 Prospekt Mira, Ekaterinburg 620002

Anastasia D. Sushchenko

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Author for correspondence.
Email: a.d.sushchenko@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0273-4422
Scopus Author ID: 57190430255
ResearcherId: AAD-8078-2020

Senior Researcher, Research Laboratory for University Development Issues,Cand.Sci. (Sociol.)

Russian Federation, 19 Prospekt Mira, Ekaterinburg 620002

References

  1. Williamson B., Eynon R., Potter J. Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education during the Coronavirus Emergency. Learning, Media and Technology. 2020; 45(2):107-114.(In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
  2. Larionova V.A., Semenova T.V., Murzakhanova E.M., Daineko L.V. Economic Aspects of Emergency Transition to Distance Education, or the Price of Going Online in Higher Education. Educational Studies. 2021;(1):138-157. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-138-157
  3. Granić A., Marangunić N. Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review.British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019; 50(5):2572-2593. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
  4. Saginova O.V., Kondratieva A.A., Iskandaryan R.A., Shipunova T.S. Competitiveness Indicators in the University Development Programs. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravleniye. Pravo = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2019; (1):44-55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2019-1-44-55
  5. Nortvig A.-M., Petersen A.K., Balle S.H. A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2018; 16(1):46-55. Available at: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1855(accessed 21.09.2021). (In Eng.)
  6. Blackman S. The Impact of COVID-19 on Education Equity: A View from Barbados and Jamaica.Prospects. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09568-4
  7. Chen F.-H. Sustainable Education Through E-Learning: The Case Study of iLearn2.0. Sustainability (Switzerland).2021; 13(18):10186. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810186
  8. Iyengar R. Education as the Path to a Sustainable Recovery from COVID-19. Prospects. 2020; 49:77-80.(In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09488-9
  9. Müller C., Mildenberger T. Facilitating Flexible Learning by Replacing Classroom Time with an Online Learning Environment: A Systematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education. Educational Research Review. 2021; 34:100394. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
  10. Bond M., Bedenlier S., Marín V.I., Händel M. Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education: Mapping the First Global Online Semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2021;18. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  11. Rezer T.M. Social Values of Students in Conditions of Digitalization of Education and COVID-19.Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2021; 25(2):226-243. (In Eng., abstract in Russ.) doi:https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.103.025.202102.226-243
  12. Antonova N.L., Merenkov A.V. Flipped Learning in Higher Education: Problems and Contradictions.Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2018; 22(2):237-247. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi:https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.237-247
  13. Jung Y., Lee J. Learning Engagement and Persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS).Computers and Education. 2018; 122:9-22. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
  14. Campillo-Ferrer J.M., Miralles-Martínez P. Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students’Self-Reported Motivation and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.2021; 8. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4
  15. Ghani S., Taylor M. Blended Learning as a Vehicle for Increasing Student Engagement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2021; 2021(167):43-51. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20458
  16. Maiti M., Priyaadharshini M., Vinayaga Sundaram B. Augmented Reality in Virtual Classroom for Higher Education During COVID-19 Pandemic. In: K. Arai (ed). Intelligent Computing. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol 285. Springer, Cham; 2021. p. 399-418. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80129-8_29
  17. Larionova V.A., Semenova T.V., Shmeleva E.D., Daineko L.V., Yurasova I.I. Forced Transition to Distance Learning: Students’ Expectations and Concerns. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2020; 24(4):22-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.04.032
  18. Cullinan J., Flannery D., Harold J., Lyons S., Palcic D. The Disconnected: COVID-19 and Disparities in Access to Quality Broadband for Higher Education Students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2021; 18:26. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1
  19. Bekova S.K., Terentev E.A., Maloshonok N.G. Educational Inequality and COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationship between the Family Socio-Economic Status and Student Experience of Remote Learning. Educational Studies. 2021; (1):74-92. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-74-92
  20. Händel M., Stephan M., Gläser-Zikuda M., Kopp B., Bedenlier S., Ziegler A. Digital Readiness and Its Effects on Higher Education Students’ Socio-Emotional Perceptions in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1846147
  21. Gritsova O.A., Tissen E.V. Quality Assessment of Online Learning in Regional Higher Education Systems. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2021; 17(3):929-943. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-15
  22. Abid T., Zahid G., Shahid N., Bukhari M. Online Teaching Experience during the COVID-19 in Pakistan:Pedagogy–Technology Balance and Student Engagement. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences.2021; 14:367-391. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00325-7
  23. Akareem H.S., Hossain S.S. Determinants of Education Quality: What Makes Students’ Perception Different?Open Review of Educational Research. 2016; 3(1):52-67. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
  24. Lareau A. Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black Families and White Families.American Sociological Review. 2002; 67(5):747-776. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3088916
  25. Choi J.J., Robb C.A., Mifli M., Zainuddin Z. University Students’ Perception to Online Class Delivery Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Hospitality Education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2021; 29:100336. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100336
  26. Davidovitch N., Yossel-Eisenbach Y. The Learning Paradox: The Digital Generation Seeks a Personal,Human Voice. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. 2019; 6(2):61-68. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.62.61.68
  27. Stukalova I.B. Development of Master’s Degree Program in Russia: Preconditions, Problems and Perspectives.Sovremennoye obrazovaniye = Modern Education. 2018; (3):1-8. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi:https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8736.2018.3.26892

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Agarkov G.A., Sandler D.G., Sushchenko A.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

We use cookies and Yandex.Metrica to improve the Site and for good user experience. By continuing to use this Site, you confirm that you have been informed about this and agree to our personal data processing rules.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).