Use of Nonlinear Dynamic Motivational Strategies to Manage L2 Academic Entitlement and Psychological Reactance

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Expanding the dynamicity and nonlinearity of L2 motivation introduced by Bahari (2019a) based on the complex dynamics systems theory has served as the theoretical framework to introduce and contextualize nonlinear dynamic motivational strategies (NDMSs). The present study used the NDMSs to manage L2 academic entitlement and psychological reactance as two obstructive factors in the L2 learning-teaching process. For conceptualization purposes, a mixed methods approach was conducted among teachers as well as learners to examine the effectiveness of proposed strategies as a pedagogical tool to manage and minimize these obstructive factors in academic contexts. The observed effectiveness of the NDMSs at managing and minimizing the analyzed obstructive factors along with replacing teacher-centered and test-oriented L2 classrooms with a learner-friendly motivating L2 classroom has significant pedagogical and theoretical implications. The major finding of the study following a rigorous methodological triangulation of the data that was collected confirms the effectiveness of the NDMSs as an L2 teaching strategy to cater to the diversity of individual differences for the purpose of improving teacher-learner interactions. Drawing on the results, it can be safely concluded that the NDMSs as the independent variable of the study showed significant impact on managing and minimizing academic entitlement and psychological reactance.

Sobre autores

Akbar Bahari

University of Qom

Email: bahariakbar2020@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4575-6480

Bibliografia

  1. Achacoso, M. V. (2002). What do you mean my grade is not an A? An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.
  2. Bahari, A. (2018). Nonlinear dynamic motivation-oriented telecollaborative model of language learning via formulaic sequences to foster learner autonomy. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 65-81.http://www.tewtjournal.org.
  3. Bahari, A. (2019a). FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and nonlinear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency. Computers & Education, 130(3), 40-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.009
  4. Bahari, A. (2019b). The Impact of applying FonF practice model on developing L2 listening and speaking with a focus on intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition in CALL context. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 14, 1-15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2019.10785
  5. Bahari, A. (2020a). Mainstream theoretical trends and future directions of L2 motivation studies in classroom and CALL contexts. CALL-EJ, 21(1), 1-28.
  6. Bahari, A. (2020b). Computer-Assisted Language Proficiency Assessment Tools and Strategies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 34-59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1726738
  7. Bjorklund, W. L., & Rehling, D. L. (2009). Student perceptions of classroom incivility. College Teaching, 58(1), 15-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903252801
  8. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1), 7-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
  9. de Bot, K., & Larsen Freeman, L. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5-24). John Benjamins.
  10. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
  11. Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
  12. Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and teachers' practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Hill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 66-84). Routledge.
  13. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
  14. Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719-726. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.003
  15. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of Psychology Test between Likert Scale 5 and 6 Points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403.
  16. Chowning, K., & Campbell, N. J. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students' externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 982-997. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016351
  17. Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., & Easter, M. A. (2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(4), 332-344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.169.4.332-344
  18. Clark, C. M., & Springer, P. J. (2007). Thoughts on incivility: Student and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(2), 93-97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-4-3-2
  19. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility at the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64-80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64
  20. Csizer, K., & Luk_acs, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38(1), 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.001
  21. Csizer, K., & Magid, M. (Eds.). (2014). The impact of self-concept on language learning. Multilingual Matters.
  22. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
  23. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
  24. Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E.Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Continuum. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212397.ch-009
  25. Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self-images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437-462. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005
  26. Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. Routledge.
  27. Dörnyei, Z., Ibrahim, Z., & Muir, C. (2015). Directed Motivational Currents: Regulating complex dynamic systems through motivational surges. In Z. Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.
  28. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
  29. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1006
  30. Feldmann, L. J. (2001). Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities. College Teaching, 49, 137-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2001.10844595
  31. Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs. Routledge.
  32. Fives, H., Lacatena, N., & Gerard, L. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about teaching (and learning). In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 249-265). Routledge.
  33. Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 469-486. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00026-6
  34. Fusella, P. V. (2013). Dynamic systems theory in cognitive science: Major elements, applications, and debates surrounding a revolutionary meta-theory. Dynamic Psychology, 1, 258-307.http://dynapsyc.org/2013/Fusella.pdf.
  35. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). Macmillan.
  36. Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self- entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1193-1204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9284-9
  37. Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.
  38. Henry, A., Davydenko, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Modern Language Journal, 99, 329- 345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12214
  39. Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). Multilingual Matters. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2501.8722
  40. Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting Complexity Theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100, 741-756. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12347
  41. Hoover, E. (2007). Here's looking at you, kid: Study says many students are narcissists. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(27).https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ757228.
  42. Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J. M. (2015). What lies bubbling beneath the surface? A longitudinal perspective on fluctuations of ideal and Ought-to L2 self among Chinese learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 331-354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0015
  43. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
  44. Kikuchi, K. (2015). Demotivation in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  45. Kim, K. J. (2009). Demotivating factors in secondary English education. English Teaching, 64(4), 249-267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.64.4.200912.249
  46. Kim, S., Levine, T., & Allen, M. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64, 273-295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755639
  47. Lamb, M. (2012). A self-system perspective on young adolescents' motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62(4), 997-1023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x
  48. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015a). Ten ‘lessons' from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11-19). Multilingual Matters. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-004
  49. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015b). Complexity theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 227-244). Routledge.
  50. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  51. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., Proudfoot, D., & Fitzsimons, G, J. (2013). Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 152-162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.004
  52. Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107-125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049386
  53. Liu, Y., & Thompson, A.S. (2018). Language learning motivation in China: An exploration of the L2MSS and psychological reactance. System, 72, 37-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.025
  54. Lombardi, J. V. (2007). The academic success entitlement. Inside Higher Education.http://www.insidehighered.com.
  55. Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 57-62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469809
  56. MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing and idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149-171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
  57. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60156-2
  58. Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory-40 years later. Social Psychology, 37, 9-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9
  59. Morrow, W. (1994). Entitlement and achievement in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(1), 33-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074084
  60. Moskovsky, C., Racheva, S., Assulaimani, T., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 Motivational Self System and L2 Achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641-654. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12340
  61. Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  62. Quick, B. L., & Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483-491. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802342150
  63. Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255-276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300427
  64. Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 655-693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038648
  65. Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47-73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
  66. Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. (2015). A psycho-social system approach to well-being: Empirically deriving the five domains of positive functioning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 141-152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.920409
  67. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
  68. Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 369-390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12400
  69. Sheldon, K., Boehm, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Variety is the spice of happiness: The hedonic adaptation prevention (HAP) model. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 901-914). Oxford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0067
  70. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.
  71. Thompson, A. S., (2017). Don't tell me what to do! The anti-ought-to self and language learning motivation. System, 67, 38-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.004
  72. Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 314-331. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.985631
  73. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled - And more miserable than ever before. Free Press.
  74. Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond Global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451-454. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407
  75. You, C., & Chan, L. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self-guides. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 405-430). Multilingual Matters. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457134_3
  76. You, C., Dörnyei, Z. & Csiz'er, K. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China, language learning, 66(1), 94-123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12140
  77. Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & de Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. Modern Language Journal, 98, 704-723. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118
  78. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children's motivations for reading: An initial study (Research Rep. No. 34). National Reading Research Center.
  79. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.