Evidence-Based Social Sciences and Practices: A Scoping Review

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction: The evidence-based medicine (EBM) was introduced in the 1990s, paving the way for the new approaches to science methodology and research evidence that changed medicine-related practices. Following the EBM, social sciences ranging from education to public governance and policymaking entered a new stage of knowledge production and dissemination. Each evidence-based social science field produces its own evidence and evidence synthesis laying the foundation for efficient social practices. Pilot searches failed to bring complex and complete evidence-based methodology for social sciences.

Purpose: This scoping review aims to identify the scope of the evidence-based social sciences and practices as an emerging field.

Method: The review adhered to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, and the PPC framework. The eligibility criteria include problem (population), concept, context, language, time period, types of sources, geographical location, databases, areas of research. The searches to identify relevant publications entail searches in the Scopus database. The studies were identified and selected by screening titles, abstracts and full texts, totalling 35 documents.

Results: The results cover search and selection outcomes; a bibliometric analysis, the breakdown of the publications among the four thematic clusters; the findings relating to evidence-based medicine and practice methodology applicable to social sciences; the analysis of the research area of evidence-based social sciences and practices; the social science practices by sectors. Much of the EBM methodology was directly borrowed by social sciences. Though, the major controversy was found in the hierarchy and levels of evidence as social sciences are subject to human choices. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were analysed in the context of social sciences. The most elaborated and fast developing evidence-based areas in social sciences contained evidence-based education and evidence-based policymaking, with systems of governmental agencies and institutions introducing these evidence-based practices.

Сonclusion. The review attained the objective and gave answers to the research questions. Only few studies were published to comprehensively address the emerging field of evidence-based social sciences and practices. Fragmentated sub-fields are covered unevenly, with many mythological divergences and disputed issues, including the quality of evidence, their weight and hierarchy, types of research.

Авторлар туралы

Lilia Raitskaya

MGIMO University

Email: raitskaya.l.k@inno.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2086-6090
Moscow, Russia

Elena Tikhonova

HSE University; RUDN University

Email: jle.hse.journal@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8252-6150
Russia; Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Ackers, L. (2000). The Development of Affirmative Action in European Commission Policy-Making: Assessing the Risks. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 22 (3), 347-360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01418030050130239
  2. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  3. Bai, Z.-G., Bing, Q., Gong, R.-R., Bai, R.-H., Zhou, Y., & Yang, K.-H. (2022). Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 3: The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 141, 132-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.031
  4. Bala, M.M., Poklepović Peričić, T., Zajac, J., Rohwer, A., Klugarova, J., Välimäki, M., et al. (2021).What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE, 16(7), 1-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254191
  5. Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. (2018). Evidence-based management: how to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. New York & London: Kogan Page.
  6. Berlin, J.A., & Golub, R.M. (2014). Meta-analysis as evidence: building a better pyramid. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 603-5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8167
  7. Betts, K., Miller, M., Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Shewokis, P.A., Anderson, A., Borja, C., Galoyan, T., Delaney, B., Eigenauer, J.D., & Dekker, S. (2019).International Report: Neuromyths and Evidence-Based Practices in Higher Education. Online Learning Consortium.
  8. Biesta, G. J. (2010). Why what works still won't work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491-503. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
  9. Boaz, A., & Nutley, S. (2019). Using evidence, In A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser and S. Nutley (eds) What Works Now? Evidence-informed Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 251-77.
  10. Boruch, R.F., & Rui, N. (2008). From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 1 (1), 41-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2008.00004.x
  11. Brown, A.N., Cameron, D.B., & Wood, B.D.K. (2014). Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6(3), 215-235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2014.944555
  12. Burkhauser, R.V., & Burkhauser, S.V. (2024). Policy research institutes' role in the development of evidence for evidence-based policymaking in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, (in press). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22593
  13. Carpenter, D. (2014). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835119
  14. Chisum, R. (2019). An Evidence-Based Faculty Development Program for Online Teaching in Higher Education. University of New England. All Theses and Dissertations at DUNE: DigitalUNE, 269.https://dune.une.edu/theses/269.
  15. Concato, J. (2013). Study design and evidence in patient-oriented research. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 187 (11), 1167-1172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201303-0521OE
  16. Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, N., Martin, J., Hopayian, K., Porzsolt, F., Burls, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Medical Education, 5(1), 1-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-1
  17. De Vincenzo, C., Stocco, N., & Modugno, R. (2023). A Critical Sociocultural Understanding of Evidence-Based Research and Practice Paradigm in Contemporary Psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09798-5
  18. Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 2-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005
  19. Dechartres, A., Altman, D.G., Trinquart, L., et al. (2014). Association between analytic strategy and estimates of treatment outcomes in meta-analyses. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 623-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8166
  20. den Heyer, G. (2022). Evidence-based policing: A review of its adoption and use by police agencies in the United States of America.International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 69, 1000532. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100532
  21. Drèze, J. (2018). Evidence, policy and politics: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Social science & medicine, 210, 45-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.025
  22. Duflo, E., Kremer, M., 2005. Use of randomization in the evaluation of development effectiveness. In: Pitman, G.K., Feinstein, O.N., Ingram, G.K. (Eds.), Evaluating Development Effectiveness. Transaction Publishers, London 2005.
  23. Egger, A.E. (2019). The role of introductory geoscience courses in preparing teachers-and all students-for the future: Are we making the grade?. GSA Today, 29(10), 4-10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG393A.1
  24. Gil-Olivares Alva-Diaz, C., Pinedo-Torres, I., Pacheco-Barrios, N., Aliaga Llerena, K.M., & Huerta-Rosario, M. (2024). Postulates of evidence-based medicine have transformed into myths. Educación Médica, 25, 100887. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100887
  25. Gleeson, J., Rickinson, M., Walsh, L., Cutler, B., Salisbury, M., Hall, G. and Khong, H. (2023) Quality use of research evidence: practitioner perspectives, Evidence & Policy, XX(XX): 1-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16778434724277
  26. Goerger, S., Mummolo, J., & Westwood, S.J. (2023). Which Police Departments Want Reform? Barriers to Evidence-Based Policymaking. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10, 403 - 412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.21
  27. Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., et al. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47
  28. Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S.A. (2013). Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: A Review of the Empirical Research Literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23 (2), 157-166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512467072
  29. Graziano, A.M., & Raulin, M.L. (1997). Research methods, a process of inquiry (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
  30. Riaz, I.B., Khan, M.S., Riaz, H., & Goldberg, R.J. (2015). Disorganized systematic reviews and meta-analyses: time to systematize the conduct and publication of these study overviews? American Journal of Medicine, 129 (3), 339.e11-339.e18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.009
  31. Haddaway, N.R., Bernes, C., Jonsson, B.-G., & Hedlund, K. (2016). The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management. Ambio, 45, 613-620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0773-x
  32. Hamermesh, D. S. (2007). Viewpoint: Replication in Economics. Canadian Journal of Economics/ Revue Canadienne D'économique, 40 (3), 715-733. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00428.x
  33. Hannes, K., & Claes, L. (2007). Learn to Read and Write Systematic Reviews: The Belgian Campbell Group. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 748 - 753. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507303106
  34. Harris, M.K., & Williams, L.T. (2019). Evidence-based policymaking in auditing regulation: An historical analysis of academic research citation in PCAOB standard-setting practices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(3), 238-251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.05.003
  35. Hilton, G.M., Bhuller, Y., Doe, J.E., Wolf, D.C., & Currie, R.A. (2023). A new paradigm for regulatory sciences. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 145, 105524. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105524
  36. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.http://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3. doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
  37. Howlett, A., Colla, E., & Joyce, R. (2024). Toward Redefining Library Research Support Services in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: An Evidence-Based Practice Approach. New Review of Academic Librarianship. (in press). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2024.2306360
  38. Howlett, A., & Thorpe, C. (2018). ‘It's what we do here': Embedding evidence-based practice at USQ Library. In: Asia-Pacific Library and Information Conference 2018, 30 July - 2 August 2018, Gold Coast, Australia.
  39. Humphries, B. (2003). What else counts as evidence in evidence-based social work? Social Work Education, 22(10, 81-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470309130
  40. Hunsley, J. (2007). Addressing key challenges in evidence-based practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(2), 113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.2.113
  41. Klose, S. (2024). Re-defining evidence-based policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2024, 18, 1-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad095
  42. Knezevic, N.N., Manchikanti, L., Hirsch, J.A. (2024). Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine. In: Navani, A., Atluri, S., Sanapati, M. (eds) Essentials of Regenerative Medicine in Interventional Pain Management. Springer, Cham. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50357-3_2
  43. Koufogiannakis, D., & Brettle, A. (2016). Being evidence based in library and information practice. Facet Publishing.
  44. Krause, P., & Licona, G.H. (2020). From experimental findings to evidence-based policy. World Development, 127, 104812. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104812
  45. Larsen, C.M., Terkelsen, A.S., Carlsen, A.F., Kristensen, H.K. (2019). Methods for teaching evidence-based practice: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1-33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1681-0
  46. Leach, M.J., & Veziari, Y. (2022). Enablers and barriers to evidence implementation in complimentary medicine: A systematic review.Integrative Medicine Research, 11 (4), 1000899. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2022.100899
  47. Levine, A.S. (2020). Why do practitioners want to connect with researchers? Evidence from a field experiment. PS - Political Science and Plitics, 53(4), 712-717. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000840
  48. Lionardo, A., Nomaini, F., Madri Bafadhal, O, Dwi Santoso, A., & Alfitri. (2024). What makes Indonesian government officials believe in and implement evidence-based policy: The mediating role of religion-science compatibility beliefs. Heliyon, 10(3), e24879. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24879
  49. Luján, J.L. (2023). Evidence-based policies: Lessons from regulatory science. Politics & Policy, 51 (4), 524-537. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543
  50. Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4 (3), 445-455. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342
  51. Mayer, R.E. (1997) Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32(1), 1-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
  52. Mazurek Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Making the case for evidence-based practice and cultivalting a spirit of inquiry. In: Mazurek Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (eds.). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing d Healthcare A Guide to Best Practice. (4. ed.). Wolters Kluwer, p. 7-32.
  53. Meilia, P.D., Freeman, M.D., Herkutanto, Zeegers, M.P. (2018) A review of the diversity in taxonomy, definitions, scope, and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice. Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology,14, 460-468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-018-0031-6
  54. Moffitt, S.L. (2010). Promoting agency reputation through public advice: Advisory committee use in the FDA. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 880-893. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161000023X
  55. Murad, M.H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., Alahdab, F., & Murdach, A.D. (2016). New evidence pyramid. Evidence-Based Medicine, 21 (4), 125-127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401
  56. Murdach, A.D. (2010). What good is soft evidence? Social work, 55 (4), 309-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/55.4.309
  57. Nielsen, L.D., Løwe, M.M., Mansilla, F., Jørgensen, R.B., Ramachandran, A., Noe, B.B., & Egebæk, H.K. (2024).Interventions, methods and outcome measures used in teaching evidence-based practice to healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Education, 24, 306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05259-8
  58. Nilendu, D. (2024). Enhancing forensic education: exploring the importance and implementation of evidence-based education system. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences.
  59. Oancea, A., & Pring, R. (2009). The importance of being thorough: On systematic accumulations of what works in educational research. In D. Bridges, P. Smeyers, & R. Smith (Eds.), Evidence-based education policy: What evidence? What basis? Whose policy? (pp. 11-35). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  60. Perez-Gonzalez, S. (2024). Evidence of mechanisms in evidence-based policy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103, 95-104. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.006 (cited from Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. (2011). Sign 50: A guideline developer's handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2011.pdf). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.006(citedfromScottishIntercollegiateGuidelinesNetwork.(2011).Sign50
  61. Pizard, S., Acerenza, F., Vallespir, D., & Kitchenham, B. (2023). Assessing attitudes towards evidence-based software engineering in a government agency. Information and Software Technology, 154, 107101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107101
  62. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  63. Reiss, J. (2016). Error in economics: Towards a more evidence-based methodology. London: Routledge.
  64. Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2007).Interpreting causality in the health sciences.International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21(2), 157-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590701498084
  65. Rouphael, A.B. (2022). The replicability crisis in science and protected area research: Poor practices and potential solutions. Journal for Nature Conservation, 69, 126236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126236
  66. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M., Gray, J.A., Haynes, R.B., & Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7050.170c
  67. Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence- Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  68. Schwarz, B., & Tilling, K. (2023). Making evidence-based practice actionable in the social service context: experiences and implications of workplace education. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35 (9), 311-328. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2022-0168
  69. Shan, Y., & Williamson, J. (2021). Applying Evidential Pluralism to the social sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(4), 96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00415-z
  70. Shea, B.J., Grimshaw, J.M., Wells, G.A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A.C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L.M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 10 - 10.
  71. Shea, B.J., Reeves, B.C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Weilch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D.A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMG (Online) 358,j4008. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
  72. Sheble, L. (2017). Macro-level diffusion of a methodological knowledge innovation: Research synthesis methods, 1972-2011. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23864
  73. Sherman, L. W. (1998). Ideas in American Policing: Evidence-Based Policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
  74. Shumba, R. (2015). Towards a digital forensics competency-based program: Making assessment count. Annual Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law. May 21, 2015. Daytona Beach, Florida.
  75. Spencer, T. D., Detrich, R., and Slocum, T. A. (2012). Evidence-Based Practice: A Framework for Making Effective Decisions. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(2), 127-151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2012.0013
  76. Sur, R.L., & Dahm, P. (2011). History of evidence-based medicine. Indian Journal of Urology, 27(4), 487-489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91438
  77. Tellings, A. (2017). Evidence-based Practice in the social sciences? A scale of casualty, interventions, and possibilities for scientific proof. Theory & Psychology, 27(5), 581-599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317726876
  78. Thorpe, C. (2021). Announcing and advocating: The missing step in the EBLIP model. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 16(4), 118-125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30044
  79. Tian, J., Zhang, J., Ge, L., Yang, K., & Song, F. (2017). The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85 (1), 50-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004
  80. Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horseley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., & Akl, E.A. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  81. Veerman, J. W., & Van Yperen, T. A. (2007). Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(2), 212-221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.011
  82. Watts, R. (2014). Truth and Politics: Thinking About Evidence-Based Policy in the Age Of Spin. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73, 34-46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12061
  83. Weber, E., Wyverkens, A., & Leuridan, B. (2024). Rethinking Evidence-Based Management. Philosophy of Management, 23, 59-84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00236-5
  84. White, H. (2022). Evidence-based social sciences in China Paper 1: Introduction. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 141, 149-151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.015
  85. White, H. (2019). The twenty-first century experimenting society: the four waves of the evidence revolution. Palgrave Communications, 5, 1-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0253-6
  86. Wyer, P.C., & Silva, S.A. (2009). Where is the wisdom? A conceptual history of evidence-based medicine. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 15 6, 891-8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01323.x
  87. Young T., Rohwer A., Volmink J., & Clarke, M. (2014).What are the effects of teaching evidence-based health care (EBHC)? Overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086706
  88. Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950-2015. International Sociology, 33 (1), 3-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580917742003
  89. Zapp, M., & Powell, J.J.W. (2016). How to construct an organizational field: Empirical educational research in Germany, 1995-2015. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 537-557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116641422
  90. Zarghi, N., & Khorasani, S.D. (2018). Evidence-based social sciences: a new emerging field. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 5 (2), 207-211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/ejser-2018-0048
  91. Concato, J. (2013). Study design and evidence in patient-oriented research. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 187 (11), 1167-1172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201303-0521OE
  92. De Vincenzo, C., Stocco, N., & Modugno, R. (2023). A Critical Sociocultural Understanding of Evidence-Based Research and Practice Paradigm in Contemporary Psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-18.
  93. Goerger, S., Mummolo, J., & Westwood, S.J. (2020). Which Police Departments Want Reform? Barriers to Evidence-Based Policymaking. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10, 403 - 412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.21
  94. Howlett, A., Colla, E., & Joyce, R. (2024). Toward Redefining Library Research Support Services in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: An Evidence-Based Practice Approach. New Review of Academic Librarianship.
  95. Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2023). Making evidence-based practice actionable in the social service context: experiences and implications of workplace education. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35 (9), 311-328. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2022-0168
  96. Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950-2015. International Sociology, 33, 26 - 3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580917742003

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.