The Status of Theme in Research Article Abstracts in Seven Dentistry Subdisciplines: A Text-Based Study of Intradisciplinary Variations and Similarities in Thematic Choices and Thematic Progression Patterns

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

A research article (RA) abstract provides an overview or summary of the whole research. It is one of the most important sections in an RA since it is the first section researchers read to decide if the article is relevant to their research or not. Researchers need to know the intradisciplinary (within the same discipline) variations and similarities in the choice of Theme and thematic progression (TP) patterns in RA abstracts in their discipline. Several studies have investigated variations and similarities in the use of Theme across disciplines. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of studies investigating intradisciplinary variations in the use of Theme in RA abstracts of dentistry subdisciplines. As epistemological differences exist between the various dentistry subdisciplines, it is pertinent to examine if there are intradisciplinary variations in the construction of Theme in the subfields of dentistry. The present study aims to investigate if there are any intradisciplinary variations and similarities in the use of Theme and TP patterns across seven dentistry subdisciplines: oral sciences, periodontics, endodontics, operative dentistry, prosthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and orthodontics. The study is framed by Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics’ approach to language and Daneš’s model for TP patterns. The findings revealed intradisciplinary significant differences between the subfields of dentistry in terms of the use of Theme types at p .05 (p-value=0.0294), while there were no significant differences in the use of TP patterns and thematic markedness. Various interesting linguistic features characterizing the subdisciplines were found, although no significant interdisciplinary differences were found between dentistry RA abstracts and the findings reported in the literature of other disciplines. Finally, implications for novice dental researchers attempting to write an RA abstract are presented.

作者简介

Hesham Alyousef

King Saud University

Email: hesham@ksu.edu.sa
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9280-9282

参考

  1. Ai, H., & Lu, X. (2013). A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students' writing. In A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 249-264). John Benjamins.
  2. Alotaibi, H. S. (2020). The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1756146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146
  3. Alyousef, H. S. (2020). A multimodal discourse analysis of English dentistry texts written by Saudi undergraduate students: A study of theme and information structure. Open Linguistics, 6, 267-283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0103
  4. Alyousef, H. S. (in press). A move-structure model for dentistry research article abstracts: A genre-based study of variations and similarities in seven dentistry subdisciplines. Discourse & Interaction, 14(1).
  5. Amdur, R. J., Kirwan, J., & Morris, C. G. (2010). Use of the passive voice in medical journal articles. AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal, 25(3), 98-104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2014-0009-RE
  6. Behnam, B., Mirzapour, F., & Mozaheb, M. A. (2014). Writer's presence in English native and non-native speaker research articles. Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 98(6), 369-374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.428
  7. Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106-128). Academia.
  8. Davies, F. (1989). Developing competence in academic discourse: The role of language awareness (ELU Working Paper No. 1). University of Liverpool.
  9. Dobakhti, L., & Hassan, N. (2017). A Corpus-based study of writer identity in qualitative and quantitative research articles. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1), 1-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-01
  10. Ebrahimi, S. F. (2016). Theme types and patterns in research article abstracts: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 4(3), 104-115.
  11. Ebrahimi, S. F., & Chan, S. H. (2015). Research article abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 381-397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1070660
  12. Ebrahimi, S. F., & Khedri, M. (2011). Thematicity in research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 2(3), 287-292.
  13. Ebrahimi, S. F., Chan, S. H., & Ain, N. A. (2014). Discourse functions of grammatical subject in results and discussion sections of research article across four disciplines. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 125-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.2
  14. Forey, G., & Sampson, N. (2017). Textual metafunction and Theme: What's it about? In T. Bartlett & G. O'Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 131-145). Routledge.
  15. Fries, P. (1995). Themes, methods of development, and texts. In R. Hasan & P. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 317-360). John Benjamins.
  16. Ghadessy, M. (1999). Thematic organization in academic article abstracts. Estudios ingleses de la universidad complutense, 7, 141-161.
  17. Gosden, H. (1992). Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), 207-224. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80010-9
  18. Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2012). Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland, & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15-33). Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 124-132). Falmer Press.
  20. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The Language of Science. In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected works of M.A.K.Halliday (vol. 5, pp. 162-178). Continuum.
  21. Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
  22. Hasan, R., & Fries, P. H. (1995). Reflections on subject and theme: An introduction. In R. Hasan & P. H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. xiii-xlv). John Benjamins.
  23. He, Y., & Tian, J. (2018). A Comparative study of thematic progression in abstracts of scientific papers: A case study of science and science bulletin. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 7(7), 1-7.
  24. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
  25. Jalilifar, A. R. (2010). The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39.
  26. Kuo, C.-H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
  27. Leong, A. P. (2004). Theme and rheme: An alternative account (vol. 266). Peter Lang.
  28. Leong, A. P. (2015). Topical themes and thematic progression: The picture of research articles. Text & Talk, 35(3), 289-315. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0001
  29. Leong, A. P. (2016). Thematic density of research-article abstracts: A systemic-functional account. WORD, 62(4), 209-227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1248668
  30. Leong, A. P., Toh, A. L. L., & Chin, S. F. (2018). Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication, 35(3), 286-314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318767378
  31. Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280-302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
  32. Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
  33. Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  34. Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
  35. Martı́nez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103-123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00003-1
  36. Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence: Evidence from thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic Writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 195-230). John Benjamins.
  37. McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Aston in Birmingham.
  38. McGregor, W. (1992). The place of circumstantials in systemic-functional grammar. In A. Davies, & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (pp. 136-149). Pinter.
  39. McKenna, B. (1997). How engineers write: An empirical study of engineering report writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 189-211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.189
  40. Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 86-101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007
  41. Nwogu, K. N., & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (vol. 55, pp. 369-384). Mouton de Gruyter.
  42. Shamim, T. (2018). A working classification proposed for indices based on dental specialties in dental research. Mustansiriya Medical Journal, 17(2), 100-103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/MJ.MJ_26_18
  43. Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327-341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3
  44. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.
  46. Tullu, M. S. (2019). Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 13(1), 12-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_685_18
  47. Williams, I. A. (2009). Discourse style and theme-rheme progression in biomedical research article discussions: A corpus-based contrastive study of translational and non-translational Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 9(2), 225-266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.2.03wil
  48. Young, R. (1995). Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning, 45(1), 3-42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可