Social Values of Students in Conditions of Digitalization of Education and COVID-19
- Authors: Rezer T.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
- Issue: Vol 25, No 2 (2021)
- Pages: 226-243
- Section: Sociology of Education
- Submitted: 05.02.2026
- Accepted: 05.02.2026
- Published: 06.02.2026
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1991-9468/article/view/381454
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.103.025.202102.226-243
- ID: 381454
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. During the COVID-19 pandemic variety of digital tools and technologies were demonstrated owing to the global digitalization of education and the total transition to online learning. The purpose of present research is to determine factors of digitalization of education and their effect on transformation of social values among high school students in conditions of the COVID-19. The results of research on social values of students were considered using comparative analysis. It was revealed that the paradigm of values among young people changed from an individual-personal one at the beginning of the XXI century to the social oriented paradigm –tolerance, openness, public recognition through social networks, self-development and contribution to the community.
Materials and Methods. The analysis of pedagogical experience in the field of digitalization of education allowed to formulate the main factors of global digitalization of education and to highlight positive and negative aspects of online learning. According to M. Rokich’s method, an empirical study of instrumental values transformations was carried out among 137 students of Ural Federal University in the conditions of full-time online learning. A questionnaire method was implemented to determine studentsʼ attitude to online learning during COVID-19 pandemic and possibility for further development of this form of learning.
Results. It was revealed that only 13.7% of respondents did not notice any decrease in the quality of learning and did not experience discomfort in obtaining knowledge in online form. According to the studentsʼ opinion the values that are subjected to transformation are the following: efficiency, self-control, responsibility, honesty. It can be concluded that the era of network personality and new scientific knowledge in pedagogy has begun. Online learning is a fait accompli which requires scientific substantiation of a new didactics and social values system development among students in a digital education environment.
Discussion and Conclusion. Achieved results contribute to ecological system of new digital services that change life and educational activities of a human, as well as transform his personality and values system. Thus, for the purpose of health and emotional intelligence preservation in students the continuation of interdisciplinary study of various aspects of education digitalization is required.
About the authors
Tatiana M. Rezer
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Author for correspondence.
Email: t.m.rezer@urfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4793-9918
Scopus Author ID: 57215964054
ResearcherId: R-1801-2016
Professor of the Department of Theory, Methodology and Legal Support of State and Municipal Administration, Dr.Sci. (Ed.), Professor
Russian Federation, 19 Mira St., Ekaterinburg 620002References
- Al Majali S., Al Khaaldi K. Values of Tolerance in Relation to Academic Achievements, Cultures, and Gender among UAE Universities Students. International Journal of Instruction. 2020; 13(3):571-586. (In Eng.)DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13339a
- Lekes N., Houlfort N., Milyavskaya M., Hope N.H., Koestner R. The Role of Intrinsic Values for Self-Growth and Community Contribution at Different Life Stages: Predicting the Vitality of University Students and Teachers Over One Year. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; 98:48-52. (In Eng.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.093
- Lin C.C. Gratitude and Depression in Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem and Well-Being.Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 87:30-34. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.017
- Freire C., Ferradás M. d. M., Regueiro B., Rodríguez S., Valle A., Núñez J.C. Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centred Approach. Frontiers of Psychology. 2020; 11:841. (In Eng.)DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841
- Hawi N.S., Samaha M. The Relations among Social Media Addiction, Self-Esteem, and Life Satisfaction in University Students. Social Science Computer Review. 2017; 35(5):576-586. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316660340
- Hayat A.A., Kojuri J., Amini M. Academic Procrastination of Medical Students: The Role of Internet Addiction.Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2020; 8(2):83-89. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.85000.1159
- Arulogun O.T., Akande O.N., Akindele A.T., Badmus T.A. Survey Dataset on Open and Distance Learning Students’ Intention to Use Social Media and Emerging Technologies for Online Facilitation. Data in Brief. 2020;31:105929. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105929
- Lepp A., Li J., Barkley J.E., Salehi-Esfahani S. Exploring the Relationships between College Studentsʼ Cell Phone Use, Personality and Leisure. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 43:210-219. (In Eng.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006
- Thomas C., Zolkoski S. Preventing Stress among Undergraduate Learners: The Importance of Emotional Intelligence, Resilience, and Emotion Regulation. Frontiers in Education. 2020; 5:94. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00094
- Parrisius C., Gaspard H., Trautwein U., Nagengast B. The Transmission of Values from Math Teachers to Their Ninth-Grade Students: Different Mechanisms for Different Value Dimensions? Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020; 62:101891. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101891
- Sagiv L., Schwartz S.H. Value Priorities and Subjective Well-Being: Direct Relations and Congruity Effects.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2000; 30(2):177-198. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228079316_Value_Priorities_and_Subjective_Well-Being_Direct_Relations_and_Congruity_Effects(accessed 30.01.2021).
- Schwartz S.H. Basic Human Values: Their Content and Structure across Countries. In: Tamayo A., Porto J.B. (Eds.). Values and Behaviour in Organizations. Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes; 2005 p. 257-294. Available at:https://publications.hse.ru/en/chapters/153053523 (accessed 30.01.2021)
- Blackwell C.K., Lauricella A.R., Wartella E.A. Factors Influencing Digital Technology Use in Early Childhood Education. Computers & Education. 2014; 77:82-90. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013
- Sahasrabudhe V., Kanungo Sh. Appropriate Media Choice for E-Learning Effectiveness: Role of Learning Domain and Learning Style. Computers & Education. 2014; 76:237-249. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.006
- Samerhanova E.K., Imzharova Z.U. Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions for Forming the Readiness of Future Teachers for Project Activities in the Context of Digitalization of Education. Vestnik of Minin University.2018; 6(2):2. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-2-2
- Reyna J., Meier P. Learner-Generated Digital Media (LGDM) as an Assessment Tool in Tertiary Science Education: A Review of Literature. IAFOR Journal of Education. 2018; 6(3):93-109. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.06
- Safuanov R.M., Lekhmus M.Y., Kolganov E.A. Digitalization of the Education System. Vestnik UGNTU.Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriya ekonomika = Bulletin of USPTU. Science, Education, Economy. Series Economy. 2019; 2(28):116-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17122/2541-8904-2019-2-28-108-113
- Barry D.M., Kanematsu H., Nakahira K., Ogawa N. Virtual Workshop for Creative Teaching of STEM Courses. Procedia Computer Science. 2018; 126:927-936. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.027
- Guasch T., Alvarez I., Espasa A. University Teacher Competencies in a Virtual Teaching/Learning Environment:Analysis of a Teacher Training Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2010; 26(2):199-206.(In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018
- Davis N., Roblyer M.D., Charania A., Ferdig R., Harms Ch., Compton L., Cho M. Illustrating the “Virtual” in Virtual Schooling: Challenges and Strategies for Creating Real Tools to Prepare Virtual Teachers. Internet and Higher Education. 2007; 10(1):27-39. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.11.001
- Tømte С., Enochsson A, Buskqvist U., Kårstein A., Ward F. Educating Online Student Teachers to Master Professional Digital Competence: The TPACK- Framework Goes Online. Computers & Education. 2015;84:26-35. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005
- Gurung B., Rutledge D. Digital Learners and the Overlapping of Their Personal and Educational Digital Engagement. Computers & Education. 2014; 77:91-100. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.012
- Orlov A.A. The Profile of Network-Related Personality in the Context of the Theory of Generations.Pedagogika = Pedagogics. 2019; (10):5-16. Available at: https://sevcbs.ru/main/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Statya-k-zhurnalu-Pedagogika-2019----10.pdf (accessed 30.01.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
- Ángel Rueda C.J., Valdés Godínes J.C., Rudman P.D. Categorizing the Educational Affordances of 3 Dimensional Immersive Digital Environments. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice.2018; 17:83-112. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4056
- Cutumisu M., Chin D.B., Schwartz D.L. A Digital Game Based Assessment of Middle School and College Students’ Choices to Seek Critical Feedback and to Revise. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019;50(6):2977-3003. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12796
- De Witte K., Rogge N. Does ICT Matter for Effectiveness and Efficiency in Mathematics Education?Computers & Education. 2014; 75:173-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.012
- Sysoeva Yu.Yu. Digital Educational Discipline Content as a Means of Motivation and Activation of Students’Activities. Pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Pedagogical Journal. 2019; 9(2A):567-573. Available at: http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-pedagogy-2019-2/65-sysoeva.pdf (accessed 30.01.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
- Azmuddin R.A., Mohd Nor N.F., Hamat A. Facilitating Online Reading Comprehension in Enhanced Learning Environment Using Digital Annotation Tools. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education.2020; 8(2):7-27 (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.01
- Dincer A. Understanding the Characteristics of English Language Learners’ Out-of-Class Language Learning through Digital Practices. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education. 2020; 8(2):47-65 (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.03
- Kraynyukov S.V. Influence of Modern Information Technologies on the Worldview. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2019; 10(4):23-41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100403
- Kerr S.T. Why We All Want It to Work: Towards a Culturally Based Model for Technology and Educational Change. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2005; 36(6):1005-1016. Available at: https://berajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00570.x (accessed 15.02.2021). (In Eng.)
- Leahy M., Holland C., Ward F. The Digital Frontier: Envisioning Future Technologies Impact on the Classroom. Futures. 2019; 113:102422. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.009
- Goradia T. Role of Educational Technologies Utilizing the TPACK Framework and 21st Century Pedagogies:Academics’ Perspectives. IAFOR Journal of Education. 2018; 6(3):43-61. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.03
- Blau I., Shamir-Inbal T., Avdiel O. How Does the Pedagogical Design of a Technology-Enhanced Collaborative Academic Course Promote Digital Literacies, Self-Regulation, and Perceived Learning of Students? The Internet and Higher Education. 2020; 45:100722. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
- Rezer T.M., Khokholush M.S. [The Development of Value Orientations of Students in the System of Secondary Vocational Education]. Obrazovaniye i nauka = Education and Science Journal. 2004; (3):74-80. Available at: http://archive.edscience.ru/sites/default/files/2004/3-2004.pdf (accessed 01.03.2021). (In Russ.)
- Guichot-Reina V. Education, Social Justice and Multiculturalism: Theory and Practice in Classrooms.Teoria De La Educacion. 2021; 33(1):173-195. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.22984
- Hattam R. Pedagogies of Non-self as Practices of Freedom. Studies in Philosophy and Education.2021; 40:51-65. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09741-w
- Garg N., Sarkar A. Vitality among University Students: Exploring the Role of Gratitude and Resilience.Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance. 2020; 7(3):321-327. (In Eng.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2020-0041
- Jahromi M.K., Manesh E.P, Hejazi F., Moosavifard Z.S., Poorgholami F. Professional Values of the Nursing Studentsʼ Perspective in Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2020; 19(3):427-432. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v19i3.45859
- Choi T.H., Chiu M.M. Toward Equitable Education in the Context of a Pandemic: Supporting Linguistic Minority Students During Remote Learning. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development.2021; 23(1):14-22. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-10-2020-0065
- Dagli G., Altinay F., Altinay Z., Altinay M. Evaluation of Higher Education Services: Social Media Learning. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 2021; 38(1):147-159. (In Eng.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2020-0032
Supplementary files


