The debate on artificial intelligence outputs: the problem of the right to the result
- Authors: Dzhaniev V.B1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian New University
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 383-388
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2541-8459/article/view/371676
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.58224/2541-8459-2025-1-383-388
- ID: 371676
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
this article is devoted to such an urgent topic in recent years as the rights to the result of artificial intelligence activity. The increasing availability of artificial intelligence for solving various kinds of tasks, including creativity, inevitably leads to the fact that there is a need for legal regulation of this area. Abroad, the question of legal regulation, the definition of the status of artificial intelligence and the results. Which can be obtained by its use, is solved in various ways. In Russia, the discussions in this part have not yet been finalized even at the theoretical level, and the question of who should be considered as right holders in relation to the results produced by artificial intelligence has not been elaborated, but there is a clear need for it. The reason is to increase accessibility of artificial intelligence for the population both for personal purposes, solution of professional tasks and for creativity. The status of such results of artificial intelligence activity is not defined. The problem of its functioning in the aspect of possibility of borrowing other people's ideas and developments, any publicly available information to fulfill the task set before it by a human remains. It is necessary to resolve the issue of rights to the results of artificial intelligence functioning at the level of law norms already in modern conditions in order to avoid problems and mass disputes in the future, including due to the fact that the application of analogy of law, based on the specifics of the tool itself – artificial intelligence, may become impossible. The result of a comprehensive analysis of existing views regarding the right to the results obtained with the use of artificial intelligence is the author's vision of the legal status of artificial intelligence and the nature of its results presented in this article.
References
- Paksi D. The coherent emergentist concept of machines; or why the popular concept of artificial intelligence is a materialist anthropomorphism // Inform?ci?s T?rsadalom. 2024. No. 24 (2). P. 85 – 100.
- Tataru S.R., Cretu C. Decoding the EU artificial intelligence act: an analysis of key concept and provisions // Journal of Public Administration Finance and Law. 2024. No. 31 (31). P. 463 – 474.
- Лукьяненко А.А. Истоки и перспективы диалектической концептуализации понятий «механизм» и «организм» при описании феномена искусственного интеллекта // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2022. № 11 (103). С. 55 – 59.
- Алехина А.О. Понятие «искусственный интеллект» и возможности применения его в сфере уголовного судопроизводства // Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии. 2024. № 1 (156). С. 186 – 192.
- Демидов А.В. Искусственный интеллект: понятие и пути его создания // Тенденции развития науки и образования. 2022. № 92-3. С. 98 – 107.
- Шиляев Д.С. Понятие искусственного интеллекта в британском и российском праве // Вопросы российской юстиции. 2024. № 32. С. 582 – 587.
- Мансуров Г.З. Понятие и признаки искусственного интеллекта // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2023. № 11 (227). С. 286 – 287.
- Мурашкин И.С. Правовой режим искусственного интеллекта и определение его понятия // правление социально-экономическим развитием: инновационный и стратегический подходы. Материалы Национальной научно-практической конференции. Гатчина, 2024. С. 420 – 424.
- Ларчев Д.В. Искусственный интеллект: понятие, признаки, классификация // Правовой альманах. 2024. № 1 (32). С. 29 – 34.
- Шарапова Е.В. К вопросу об определении понятия искусственного интеллекта в научных источниках // Трибуна ученого. 2023. № 3. С. 31 – 35.
Supplementary files
