Graduate Students’ Perceived Needs and Preferences for Supervisor Written Feedback for Thesis Writing

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

A plethora of previous research has explored students’ preferences for written feedback from teachers to respond to students’ writing in the classroom. However, little or no research has investigated graduate students’ needs and preferences regarding written feedback provided by their supervisors in response to thesis writing. This study examined the feedback needs and preferences of EFL graduate students to the three nominated themes defining supervisor written feedback to thesis writing in this study: content, genre, and linguistic feedback to thesis writing. Data was collected from 32 master’s students from the TEFL and Media and Communications at Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia using a questionnaire and an unstructured interview. The participants’ responses were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results indicated that both groups commonly preferred feedback on content the most. When sub-categories of this feedback were examined further, it was found that TEFL students favored gaps in theoretical understanding, but Media and Communications students preferred coverage and gaps in the literature. They also showed discrepancies regarding their preferences for part-genres in thesis writing and the various features of linguistic accuracy. The results of this study suggest that feedback on theses should be realized in regard to the needs and preferences of graduate students. Finally, implications for further research that could shed light on the resonant understanding of feedback on thesis writing are presented.

作者简介

Yenus Nurie

Bahir Dar University

Email: yenusn@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5999-3121
Faculty of Humanities

参考

  1. Aitchison, C., Catterall, J, Ross, P., & Burgin, S. (2012) ‘Tough love and tears': Learning doctoral writing in the sciences, Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 435-447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
  2. Ali, P. A., Watson, R., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students' and their supervisors' attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227-241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28945/3541
  3. Amrhein, H., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics,13, 95-127.
  4. Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., Rosales, J., and Ru, L.(2015). Beyond deficit: Graduate student research-writing pedagogies, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.945160
  5. Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socializing students into the academic discourse community, Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432-445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
  6. Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79-97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/11920
  7. Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Meyer, H. (2011). Best practices in supervisor feedback to thesis students. Research report. Ako Aotearoa.
  8. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.
  9. Can, G., & Walker, A. (2014). Social science doctoral students' needs and preferences for written feedback. Higher Education, 68(2), 303-318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9713-5
  10. Can, G., & Walker, A. (2011) A Model for doctoral students' perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, 52, 508-536.https://doi.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1
  11. Caterall, J., Ross, P., Aitchison, C., & Burgin, S. (2011). Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(2), Article 7.
  12. Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners' perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5), 1-17.https://doi-y.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862016-0010
  13. Chokwe, J. M. (2015). Students' and tutors' perceptions of feedback on academic essays in an open and distance learning context. Open Praxis, 7(1), 39-56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.154
  14. Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: where's the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413-425. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
  15. Esra, O. (2020).I would like her to…: ELT student-teachers' reflections on mentoring practices. PASAA: A Journal of Language teaching and learning, 59(1), 48-76.
  16. Evans, N., Hartshorn, J., McCollum, R., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4), 445-463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367
  17. Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  18. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S10603743(01)00039-X
  19. Ghandi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2014). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners' spelling errors. English Language Teaching, 7, 53-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p53
  20. Ghazal, L., Gul, R, Hanzala, M., Jessop, T., & Tharani, A. (2014) Graduate students' perceptions of written feedback at a private university in Pakistan. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 13-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p13
  21. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  22. Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision. Higher Education Research Development, 21, 41-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220124648
  23. Hoomanfard, M. H., Jafarigohar, M., Jalilifar, A., & Hosseini Masum, S. M. (2018). A comparative study of graduate students' self-perceived needs for written feedback and the supervisors' perceptions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 3-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003
  24. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum.
  25. Katayama, A. (2007). Japanese EFL students' preferences toward correction of classroom oral errors. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 289-305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.03
  26. Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461-470. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
  27. Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing approaches of graduate students. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 807-822.
  28. Lee, A. & Murray, R. (2015) Supervising writing: helping postgraduate students develop as Researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558-570. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
  29. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312. 10.1016/j. jslw:2004.08.001. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw
  30. Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
  31. Leng, K. (2014). An analysis of written feedback on ESL students' writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 389-397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1437
  32. Manjet, K. (2016). Graduate students' needs and preferences for written feedback on academic writing. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 79-88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n12p79
  33. Paré, A. (2011). Speaking and writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies (pp. 59-74). Springer. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4
  34. Pokorny, H. & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active& Learning in higher Education, 11(1), 21-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409355872
  35. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
  36. Rowe, A. (2009). The personal dimension in teaching: Why students value feedback. International Journal of Educational Managemen,t 25(4), 343-360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111136630
  37. Saeli, H. (2019). Teachers' practices and students' preferences: Grammar-centered written corrective feedback in Iran. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(1), 46-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2019.663422
  38. Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: insights from supervisors' and PhD examiners' reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903525140
  39. Sutton, P. (2009).Towards dialogic feedback. Critical and Reflective Practice in Education, 1, 1-10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_27
  40. Tee, P. L., Kumar, V., & Abdullah, M. H. (2013). Written feedback on ESL student writers' academic essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(2), 477-502.
  41. Vygotsky, L. (1978). The interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and Society (pp.79-91). Harvard University Press.
  42. Wang, T., & Jiang, L. (2015). Studies on written corrective feedback: Theoretical perspectives, empirical evidence, and future directions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 110-120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p110
  43. Wang, T., & Li, L. (2011). ‘Tell me what to do' vs ‘guide me through it': Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101-112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
  44. Wang, P. (2010). Dealing with English majors‘ written errors in Chinese universities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 194-205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3
  45. Weaver, M. (2006). Do students value feedback? Students' perception of tutors' written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
  46. Yenus, N. (2018a). Higher education supervision practices on student thesis writing: Language function and focus of written feedback. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 1-12.
  47. Yenus, N. (2018b). Doctoral students' perceived needs and preferences for supervisors' written feedback. PASAA, 56(2),112-144.
  48. Yin, K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.
  49. Yinager, T. (2019). Views of summer TEFL postgraduate students and their supervisors on the practice of thesis supervision in the Ethiopian context. PASAA, 58 (2), 131-165.
  50. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2013). Understanding supervisors' commentary practices in doctoral research proposal writing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 473-483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9
  51. Zeleke A. (2017). Ethiopian public university entrants' writing skills in English language: The case of Hawassa University entrants. International Journal of Development Research, 7(9), 15089-15092.
  52. Zewdu, E. (2012). An investigation into the research culture of Addis Ababa University: The case of a Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) PhD program [Doctoral.
  53. Dissertation]. Addis Ababa University. URL www.bdu.edu.et>bdu.edu.et.fh>files.
  54. Zhan, L. (2016). Written teacher feedback: student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and actual teacher performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73-84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p73

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可