Who Wants to Learn English Online for Free?

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

This study of demographics is aimed to help LMOOC designers develop courses that are more appealing to prospective learners, and thus fight low completion rate which remains one of the main drawbacks of MOOCs. In addition, as the world battles against the COVID-19 pandemic looking for alternative learning approaches is unavoidable. The data presented in this paper were collected between 2016 and 2020 by means of a questionnaire that over 29,000 participants completed upon registration. The questionnaire, which included three multiple-choice questions aimed at obtaining responses regarding age, level of education and gender, revealed that most learners were middle-aged adults who held a university degree. In addition, our findings seemed to indicate that female learners are more likely to take the courses than their male counterparts. The aforementioned findings, which provide an insight into the demographics of EFL MOOCs in Spanish-speaking contexts, is a good starting point for further research which could ultimately help educational authorities know the impact of EFL MOOCs and enable the latter to reach a wider audience.

Sobre autores

Rubén Chacón-Beltrán

UNED: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Email: rchacon@flog.uned.es
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-0682
Rubén Chacón-Beltrán is senior lecturer at the UNED (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia) in Madrid, Spain, where he teaches undergraduate courses in English as a foreign language and sociolinguistics, and graduate seminars in bilingualism and corpus linguistics Rubén Chacón-Beltrán is senior lecturer at the UNED (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia) in Madrid, Spain, where he teaches undergraduate courses in English as a foreign language and sociolinguistics, and graduate seminars in bilingualism and corpus linguistics. Dean of the Faculty of Philology at the UNED since 2019. He holds a PhD in Applied English Linguistics and has taught at various Spanish universities. He is the editor of the Spanish journal, ELIA (Studies in Applied English Linguistics) and head of the research group TISAAL and for 12 years was director of UNED’s MA in English Applied Linguistics. His areas of interest are vocabulary teaching and learning, materials design, bilingual education and learner autonomy in digital contexts. He has been a visiting academic at various universities like The Open University, Swansea University, University of the West of England and Birmingham City University. He has been invited as plenary speaker to give academic talks in Argentina, Ecuador and Brazil. He has presented his research in many international conferences, Peter Lang; Insights into vocabulary teaching and learning (2010), Multilingual Matters; and The impact of affective variables in L2 teaching and learning (2010), University of Seville and Bilingual and Multilingual Education in the 21st Century: Building on Experience (2013), Multilingual Matters, Sociolinguistic (2015) UNED. He is also the coauthor of some teaching materials such as Gramática Inglesa para Hispanohablantes (2010; 2017), Cambridge University Press/UNED and English Skills for Independent Learners B2 (2010) Cambridge University Press/UNED.

Raymond Echitchi

UNED: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Email: sechitch@flog.uned.es
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4154-7961
Researcher and teaching assistant at Spain's National Distance Education University, based in Madrid (Spain) Researcher and teaching assistant at Spain's National Distance Education University, based in Madrid (Spain). His duties mainly involve research, teaching (courses related to English as a Second Language and Linguistics), and the supervision of Master's dissertations.

Bibliografia

  1. Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Parada G. H. A., & Muñoz-Organero, M. (2014). Delving into participants' profiles and use of social tools in MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 260-266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2311807
  2. Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World wide web (pp. 687-698). ACM. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568042
  3. Bárcena-Madera, E., & Martín-Monje, E. (2014) Introduction. Language MOOCs: An emerging field. In E. Bárcena-Madera, & E. Martín-Monje (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp 1-15). De Gruyter Open. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.1
  4. Bayeck, R.Y. (2016). Exploratory study of MOOC learners' demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups. Open Praxis, 8(3), 223-233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.282
  5. Beaven, T., Hauck, M., Comas-Quinn, A., Lewis, T., & de los Arcos, B. (2014). MOOCs: Strinking the right balance between facilitation and self-determination. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 31-43.
  6. Caraker, R. (2016). Spain and the context of English language education. Research Bulletin, 92, 23-35.
  7. Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2014). Massive online open courses and language learning: The Case for a beginner english course. Procedia. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 141, 22-246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.042
  8. Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2018). Vocabulary learning strategies outside the classroom context: What adults learn in a technology-based learner-centred environment. The Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 583-593. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1503135
  9. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Social Science Research Network Working Paper. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
  10. Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0
  11. Cross, S. (2013). Evaluation of the OLDS MOOC curriculum design course: Participant perspectives, expectations, and experiences. OLDS MOOC Project.http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836.
  12. Despujol, I. M., Turro, C., Busqueis, J., & Canero, A. (2014). Analysis of demographics and results of student's opinion survey of a large scale MOOC deployment for the Spanish speaking community. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-8). IEEE. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2014.7044102
  13. Dillahunt, T., Chen, B., & Teasley, S. (2014). Model thinking: Demographics and performance of MOOC students unable to afford a formal education. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 145-146). ACM. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2567851
  14. Fernandez Fontecha, A. (2010). Gender and motivation in EFL vocabulary production. In R.M. Jimenéz Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 93-116). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274938_5
  15. Grünewald, F., Mazandarani, E., Meinel, C., Teusner, R., Totschnig, M., & Willems, C. (2013). OpenHPI - A case-study on the emergence of two learning communities. In Proceedings of the Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 13-15). IEEE. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530277
  16. Jimenéz Catalán, R.M. (2010). Gender tendencies in lexical acquisition and use. In R.M. Jimenéz Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 117-138). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274938
  17. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133-160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
  18. Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research In Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341-358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
  19. Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners' demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach.Computers and Education, 132, 16-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
  20. MacLeod, H., Sinclair, C., Haywood, J., & Woodgate, A. (2016). Massive open online courses: Designing for the unknown learner. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1), 13-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1101680
  21. Martín-Monje, E., Castrillo, M. D., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251-272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237
  22. Morris, N.P., Hotchkiss, S., & Swinnerton, B. (2015). Can demographic information predict MOOC learner outcomes. In Experience track: Proceedings of the EMOOC stakeholder summit (pp. 199-207). Whiterose University Consortium.https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86184.
  23. Oliveira, M., Penedo, A., & Pereira, V. (2018). Distance education. Advantages and disadvantages of [sic] the point of view of education and and society. Dialogia, 29, 139-152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661
  24. Onah, D.F.O., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioural patterns. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 5825-5834). EDULEARN14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009
  25. Read, T. (2014). The architectonics of Language MOOCs. In E. Martín-Monje, & E. Bárcena-Madera (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 91-102). De Gruyter Open.
  26. Reeves, T., & Helberg, J. G. (2014). MOOCs: Let's get real. Educational Technology, 54(1), 3-8.
  27. Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC. In E. Martín-Monje, & E. Bárcena-Madera (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 16-32). De Gruyter Open.
  28. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198-221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
  29. Yong Kim, Ock Tae Kim, Jin Gon Shon. (2019). A Historical journey into K-MOOCs leading to possible collaborations with North Korea. In K. Zhang, C. J. Bonk, T.C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.). MOOCs and open education in the global south: Challenges, successes and opportunities (pp. 17-27). Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398919-3

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.