On the problem of the collateral category of procedural phraseological units in the Russian language

the article examines the category of collateral of procedural phraseological units in the Russian language. It is established that the category of collateral of procedural phraseological units is closely related to their transitivity-intransitivity, reversibility-irrevocability. The lexical and grammatical category of transitivity-intransitivity, as well as the reversibility-irrevocability of procedural phraseological units determine the semantic and formal oppositions that develop within the morphological category of the pledge. The pledge of categorical phraseological units is considered by us as a morphological category expressing the subject-object orientation of an action. The category of collateral for procedural phraseological units has a complex grammatical nature. The pledge is an uneasy three-stage opposition in which the pledge is opposed to the passive and the reciprocal. Within the actual pledge, transitional procedural phraseological units are contrasted with intransitive ones as objectless ones. It is cut off that, in general, in the category of collateral, refundable forms are contrasted with non-refundable ones. The form of the actual pledge, saturated with various subject-object shades, is the most active and powerful in the category of collateral of procedural phraseological units. The collateral category has a phrase-changing character only for transitional procedural phraseological units, which form correlative forms of the valid and passive voice. Not all phraseological units have such forms, and they are used less and less frequently in speech. For other procedural phraseological units, the pledge is a classification category.

procedural phraseological units, pledge category, verb component, transitive verb, intransitive verb, active voice, passive voice