Email this article 
Fiction Discourse Modifications in Historical Events Construal: a Contrastive Onomasiological Study
- Authors: Chulkova E.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 6(887) (2024)
- Pages: 119-126
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2542-2197/article/view/303248
- ID: 303248
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study develops a cognitive onomasiological approach to exploring discourse modifications and onomasiological novelties in the construal of events in historical discourse with an increase of its artistic (fiction) potential. The analysis of onomastic nominations of ten historical events in scientific, publicist and fiction types of historical discourse reveals that onomasiological novelties appear in the increasing number of agentive event participants, the diversity of their behavioral patterns as well as of event spatial and temporal characteristics.
About the authors
Evdokia Dmitrievna Chulkova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: chulkova.evdokia@yandex.ru
Senior Lecturer at the Department of Rare Languages Teaching Methodology
Russian FederationReferences
- Danilenko, V. P. (1990). Onomasiologicheskoe napravlenie v grammatike = Onomasiological direction in grammar. Irkutsk: Izdatel’stvo Irkutskogo universiteta. (In Russ.)
- Kubryakova, E. S. (2002). Onomasiologiya = Onomasiology. In Yartseva, V. N. (Ed.), Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. 2nd ed. Moscow: Bol’shaya Rossiiskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russ.)
- Iriskhanova, O. K. (2014). Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya = Play of focus in language. Semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defocusing. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russ.)
- Kiose, M. I. (2015). Direct and indirect naming in the text. Moscow: OntoPrint. (In Russ.).
- Kiose, M. I. (2022). Linguistic creativity of names in discourse: cognitive semiotic aspects. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, 4(51), 490-500. (In Russ.)
- Bondarchuk, G. G. (2016). Peculiarities in the formation and functioning of English object names. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 13 (752), 18–25. (In Russ.)
- Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 61–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Cuyckens, Н., Dirven, R., Taylor, J. R. (2003). Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter.
- Kubryakova, E. S. (2020). Nominativnyi aspekt rechevoi deyatel’nosti = Nominative aspect of speech activity. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.)
- Eckardt, R., von Heusinger, K., Schwarze, C. (2003). Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational linguistics, 17(4), 409–421.
- Belyaevskaya, E. G. (2008). Componential vs conceptual analysis. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 554, 140–146. (In Russ.)
- Kraeva, I. A. (2021). Osobennosti izucheniya kategorii gradual’nosti v sovremennoj lingvistike = Specific features of studying the category of graduality in modern linguistics. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, 4(47), 121–126. (In Russ.)
- Lyashevskaya, O. N, Kashkin, E. V. (2015). Tipy informatsii o leksicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v sisteme FreiMBank = Types of information about lexical constructions in the FrameBank system. Trudy Instituta russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova, 6, 464–556. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
