Organization of a crime as an independent criminal act: criminal law characteristics and qualification problems

the article notes that the grounds of criminal liability for certain types of organizational activities are of scientific interest to researchers [1]. Agreeing with the thesis that even the most perfect legal structure is not able to cover all possible life situations and respond to all possible threats to the criminological security of the individual, society and the state, it should be noted that the desire to overcome such insufficiency entailed either a departure from accessory towards the independence of the responsibility of the organizer, or the construction of separate, independent crimes that go beyond the construction of complicity, or a combination of these approaches [2]. The need for this is related to the criticism of the practice of intensive criminalization of these actions available in the scientific literature [3]. In this regard, various approaches to grouping organizational actions have been proposed (in the theory of criminal law, scientists have proposed various approaches to grouping and typology of organizational actions, in turn, we believe it is possible to distribute the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation that make up for the limited accessory actions to organize crimes into the groups we have proposed), in addition, the article emphasizes the expediency applying a uniform approach to the construction of crimes involving responsibility for organizational actions, A number of possible directions for improving regulatory regulation and law enforcement practice have been formulated [4].

criminal liability for the organization of certain types of crimes, criminal liability for the organization of criminal activities, criminal liability for the organization of criminal groups, organizations, communities, criminal liability for the organization of actions that are inherently impenetrable before their organization, but recognized as illegal, immoral or dangerous, complicity in crime, accessory theory of complicity, theory of independent responsibility of accomplices