Mitigating Plagiarism in ESL Academic Writing: Evaluating the Efficacy of Educational Intervention

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: Plagiarism is a serious academic misconduct demanding mitigation to uphold the integrity of original work. Undeniably, with the advancement of technological age, plagiarising becomes easier and harder to detect. However, the reliance on technology significantly rises the likelihood of fostering academic dishonesty among the students. Therefore, it is imperative to disseminate explicit education on plagiarism reduction strategies, particularly on the importance of mastering correct referencing techniques.

Purpose: The present study applied a mixed-method approach to explore the effectiveness of an intervention called Educational Intervention (EI) on enhancing ESL students’ academic referencing skills namely in in-text citation abilities, paraphrasing skills and writing reference list using APA style.

Method: The EI consisted of explicit instruction that involved structured teaching sessions integrated with two primary instructional strategies: lectures and practical exercises on referencing in academic writing. A total of 70 participants participated in the study. Data collection involved administering tests, assigning exercises and assignments, and conducting focus group interviews. The study utilised a quasi-experimental design to analyse the effectiveness of the intervention. Quantitative data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and paired sample t-test to assess the effectiveness of the EI. Qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis to explore participants’ experiences and perceptions.

Results: Data analyses of the plagiarism test indicated that the experimental group showed significantly greater improvements in referencing skills compared to the control group, with statistical significance at p .05 for all assessed skills. However, findings for the gathered exercises and assignments demonstrated improvements but not statistically significant in their referencing skills except for paraphrasing. Nonetheless, feedback from focus group interviews indicated positive responses toward EI and its role in enhancing referencing skills.

Conclusion: Overall, while EI proved effective in enhancing ESL undergraduates’ referencing skills, there remains room for improvement to fully realize its potential. The study holds a global importance of imparting explicit education on referencing skills, offering educators worldwide a strategic measure aimed at reducing plagiarism act.

About the authors

Nazirah Mahmud

University of Szeged

Email: nazirah.binti.mahmud@edu.u-szeged.hu
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6343-6555
Hungary

Mohd Haniff Mohd Tahir

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Email: haniff.tahir@fbk.upsi.edu.my
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5411-1000
Malaysia

References

  1. Abusafia, A. H., Nurhanis S. R., Dariah M. Y., & Mohd Z. M. N. (2018). Snapshot of academic dishonesty among.
  2. Malaysian nursing students: A single university experience. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 13(4), 370-376. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.04.003
  3. Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423339
  4. Al-Shaibani, G.K.S., Fauzilah Md Husain, & Mahfoodh, O. (2016). A qualitative investigation into the understanding of plagiarism in a Malaysian Research University. Journal of Applied Linguistic and Language Research, 3(7), 337-352.
  5. Al-Zubaidi, K., & Richards, C. (2010). Arab postgraduate students in Malaysia: Identifying and overcoming the cultural and language barriers. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 107-129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol1no1.5
  6. Au, K.H. (1998). Social Constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 297-319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969809548000
  7. Bennett, K. K., Behrendt, L. S., & Boothby, J. L. (2011). Instructor perceptions of plagiarism: Are we finding common ground? Teaching of Psychology, 38, 29-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390851
  8. Blum, S. (2009). My word!: Plagiarism and college culture. Cornell University Press.
  9. Cuervo-Sánchez, S. L., & Etxague, I. (2023). The four P's on the Internet: Pornography, plagiarism, piracy and permission [Las cuatro P en Internet: Pornografía, plagio, piratería y permisos]. Comunicar, 76, 85-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3916/C76-2023-07
  10. Culwin, F. (2006). An active introduction to academic misconduct and the measured demographics of misconduct. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 167-182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262478
  11. DeGeeter M., Harris K., Kehr, H. Ford, C., Lane, D. C., Nuzum, D.S., & Compton, C. (2014). Pharmacy students' ability to identify plagiarism after an educational intervention. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(2), 1-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78233
  12. Dias, P. C., & Bastos, A. S. (2014). Plagiarism phenomenon in European countries: Results from GENUIS project. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2526-2531. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.605
  13. Fatemi, G., & Saito, E. (2020). Unintentional plagiarism and academic integrity: The challenges and needs of postgraduate international students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1305-1319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1683521
  14. Fazilatfar A.M., Elhambakhsh, S.E., & Allami H. (2018). An investigation of the effects of citation instruction to avoid plagiarism in EFL academic writing assignments. Sage Open, 8(2), 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018769958
  15. Horstmanshof, L., & Brownie, S. (2013). A scaffolded approach to discussion board use for formative assessment of academic writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 61-73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.604121
  16. Khazriyati S. (2016). Creating Awareness of Plagiarism among Postgraduates in a Postgraduate course through a talk. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(1), 47-51.
  17. Kusuma, I. P. I. (2020). Mengajar Bahasa Inggris dengan teknologi: Teori dasar dan ide pengajaran [Teaching English with technology: Basic theories and teaching ideas]. Deepublish.
  18. Landau, J. D., Druen, P., & Arcuri, J. A. (2002) Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Pscychology, 29(2), 112-115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2902_06
  19. Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism - A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233-245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262536
  20. Moniz, R., Fine. J. & Bliss, L. (2008). The effectiveness of direct- instruction and student-centered teaching methods on students' functional understanding of plagiarism. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(3), 255-279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10691310802258174
  21. Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). Academic writing problems of Iranian postgraduate students at National University of Malaysia (UKM). European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 593-603.
  22. Mustapha, R., Hussin, Z., Siraj, S. & Darusalam, G. (2017). Academic dishonesty among higher education students: The Malaysian evidence (2014 - 2016). KATHA - The Official Journal of the Centre for Civilisational Dialogue, 13(1), 73-93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22452/KATHA.vol13no1.4
  23. Mohamed Mohan, N. M. M., Muslim, N. & Jahari, N. A. (2020). Plagiarism: Exploring students' awareness level in higher education setting. Selangor Business Review, 5(2), 43- 55.
  24. Mohd Habali, A.H., Fong, L.L. (2016). Plagiarism in Academic Writing Among TESL Postgraduate Students: A Case Study. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (Eds.), 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. (pp. 729-740). Springer. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_57
  25. Parfitt, M. (2012). Writing in response. Bedford.
  26. Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in post-graduate second-language learning. English for Specific.
  27. Purposes, 25, 4-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004
  28. Power, L.G. (2009). University student's perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 643-662. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0073
  29. Price, P., Jhangiani, R., & A.Chiang, I. (2014). Research methods in Psychology (2nd ed.). BC Open Textbook Project.
  30. Puga, J. L. (2014). Analyzing and reducing plagiarism at university. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2), 131-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1989/ejep.v7i2.1
  31. Ramzan, M., Munir, M.A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher Education, 64(1), 73-84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9481-4
  32. Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2013). Why do Iranian postgraduate students plagiarize? A qualitative investigation. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3), 309-317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.3.522
  33. Roosevelt, F.D. (2008). Zone of proximal development. Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. SAGE publication. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963848
  34. Schuetze, P. (2004). Evaluation of a brief homework assignment designed to reduce citation problems. Teaching of Psychology, 31(4), 257-259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3104_6
  35. Shahabuddin, S. (2009). Plagiarism in academia.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 354-359.
  36. Singh, D., Steenkamp, M., Harmse, T., & Botha, J.C. (2020). Engaging the students voices to improve referencing skills and practices in higher education: A South African case study. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(5), 122-135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20853/34-5-4199
  37. Smedley, A., Crawford, T. & Cloete, L. (2019). An evaluation of an extended intervention to reduce plagiarism in Bachelor of nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 41(2), 106-108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000492
  38. Smedley, A., Crawford, T., & Cloete, L. (2015). An intervention aimed at reducing plagiarism in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 168-173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.003
  39. Sowell, J. (2018), Beyond the plagiarism checker: Helping Non-Native English Speakers (NNESs) avoid Plagiarism. English Teaching Forum, 56(2), 2-15.
  40. Sprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D. & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0002
  41. Stander, M. (2020). Strategies to help university students avoid plagiarism: A focus on translation as an intervention strategy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 156-169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1526260
  42. Teeter, J. (2015). Deconstructing attitudes towards plagiarism of japanese undergraduate in EFL academic writing classes.English Language Teaching, 8(1), 95-109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p95
  43. Turner, D. P. (2019). Sampling methods in research design. The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 60(1), 8-12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.)., The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 1: Problems of General Psychology, pp. 39-288). Plenum Press.
  45. Wingate, U., Andon, N., & Cogo, A. (2011). Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 69-81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387814
  46. Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005
  47. Zejno, B. (2018). Plagiarism in academic writing among students of higher learning institutions in Malaysia: An Islamic perspective. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 9(3), 1-14.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.