Using Quizlet and Brain Quiz in ESP virtual classroom at technical university (CEFR level B2/C1)
- Authors: Shadrina O.V.1, Korneeva E.G.1, Kabanova N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
- Issue: Vol 29, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 324-336
- Section: THEORY AND METHODS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1810-0201/article/view/297855
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-2-324-336
- ID: 297855
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Importance. The use of game design features in educational activities, or gamification of learning, is a popular, albeit contentious, trend in the field of education right now. This research applies gamification as a strategy to enhance inner motivation and learner autonomy in acquiring L2 technical vocabulary of the second language by students at the B2/C1 level in a virtual classroom.Research Methods. The case study uses a two-cycle action research design to assess the difference between learning terminology with and without Quizlet support throughout a spring semester 2022, observes the development of learner autonomy through a survey, and demonstrates the growth of inner motivation reflected by Brain Quiz team scores.Results and Discussion. The paired-sample t-test findings showed a significant difference between the two vocabulary learning cycles. After utilising Quizlet, students’ vocabulary scores on Moodle quizzes increased by 10 to 15 % on average across all grade levels. As part of the evaluation process, the online formative assessment “Brain Quiz” demonstrates that students with higher performance on Moodle quizzes are able to establish more productive teams.Conclusion. The study can contribute to the English Language Teaching (ELT) literature regarding innovative and technological tools that can improve students’ language skills in the 21st century.
About the authors
O. V. Shadrina
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
Email: nvkvolesya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1980-3754
кандидат филологических наук, старший преподаватель департамента иностранных языков
1bldg. 9 Institursky Ln., Moscow, 141701, Russian FederationE. G. Korneeva
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
Email: korneeva.eg@mail.ru
PhD, Senior Lecturer of Foreign Languages Department
1bldg. 9 Institursky Ln., Moscow, 141701, Russian FederationN. V. Kabanova
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: nv_arkhipova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4771-4484
Lecturer of Foreign Languages Department
1bldg. 9 Institursky Ln., Moscow, 141701, Russian FederationReferences
- González-Fernández B., Schmitt N. (2019). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisi-tion of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 481-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057
- Staehr L.S. (2008). Vocabulary breadth and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, vol. 36, issue 2, pp. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
- Uchihara T., Clenton J. (2018). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, vol. 24, issue 4, pp. 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818799371
- Tuan D.M. (2021). Learner autonomy in English language learning: Vientnamese EFL students’ perceptions and practices. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 307-317. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.29605
- Aysu S. (2022). The role of learner autonomy on vocabulary learning. Rumeli DEDilve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 31, pp. 1534-1545. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1222355
- McDevitt B. (1997). Learner autonomy and the need for learner training. The Language Learning Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739785200251
- Almusharraf N. (2018). English as a foreign language learner autonomy in vocabulary development. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2018-0022
- Cheng M.-T., Chen J.-H. et al. (2015). The use of serious games in science education: a review of selected em-pirical research from 2002 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, no. 2 (3), pp. 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0039-9
- Deterding S., Sicart M. et al. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. CHI EA’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2425-2428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
- Seaborn K., Fels D.I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: a survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studiem, no. 74, pp. 14-31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
- Hosseini Ch., Haddara M. (2019). Gamification in enterprise systems: a literature review. Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC), vol. 2, pp. 552-562. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32523-7_39
- Costa F.A., Raleiras M., Viana J. (2021). 12 pedagogical principles for the use of gamification in higher educa-tion. ICERI2021 Proceedings, pp. 7156-7163. http://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.1607
- Zainuddin Z., Chu S. K.-W. et al. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, vol. 30, article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
- Welbers K., Konijn E.A., Burgers C. et al. (2019). Gamification as a tool for engaging student learning: A field experiment with a gamified app. E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 92-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018818342
- Stieglitz S., Lattemann C., Robra-Bissantz S. et al. (2017). Gamification: Using Game Elements in Serious Con-texts. Cham, Springer Publ., 164 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0
- Dehghanzadeh H., Fardanesh H. et al. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second lan-guage: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 34, issue 7, pp. 934-957. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
- Kabanova N.V. (2023). Simulation as a means of raising els motivation at a technical university. Materialy 10 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Mnogourovnevaya yazykovaya podgotovka v uslo-viyakh polikul’turnogo obshchestva» [Proceedings of 10th International Scientidic and Practical Conference “Multilevel Language Training in a Multicultural Society”]. Kazan, Kazan State Institute of Culture Publ., pp. 44-50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yxcobc
- Shadrina O.V., Korneeva E.G. (2022). Obrazovatel’nyi kvest kak forma geimifikatsii distantsionnogo obuche-niya [Educational quest as a form of gamification of distance learning]. Materialy 17 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Mirovye nauchnye issledovaniya: puti sovershenstvovaniya, razrabotki i prakticheskie vnedreniya» [Proceedings of 17th International Scientific and Practical Conference “World scientific research: ways of improvement, development and practical implementation”]. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Publ., pp. 52-55. (In Russ.)
- Polyakova V.A. (2017). Instrumenty geimifikatsii kak sredstvo povysheniya motivatsii k izucheniyu russkogo yazyka [Gamification tools as a means of increasing motivation to learn Russian]. Materialy 1 Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [Proceedings of 1st International Conference], Simferopol, LLC “PP “Arial”, vol. 2, pp. 300-306. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zdzwsv
- Akchelov E.O., Nikitina K.S. (2019). New approach to gamification in education. Vektory blagopoluchiya: eh-konomika i sotsium = Journal of Wellbeing Technologies, no. 1 (32), pp. 117-132. (In Russ.) https://elib-rary.ru/wclink
- Abuhamdeh S., Nakamura J., Csikszentmihalyi M. (2005). Flow. Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, The Guilford Press, pp. 598-608.
- Kim S., Song K., Lockee B.V., Burton J. (2018). Gamification in learning and education: enjoy learning like gaming. British Journal of Educational Studies, Cham, Springer Publ., 159 p. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6
- Dreyer J. (2014). The effect of computer-based self-access learning on weekly vocabulary test scores. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 217-234. http://doi.org/10.37237/050303
- Tosun S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 199, no. 3, pp. 641-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592
- Vargas J.M. (2011). Modern learning: Quizlet in the social studies classroom. Doctoral dissertation. Wichita: Wichita State University.
- Anjaniputra A.G., Salsabila V.A. (2018). The merits of Quizlet for vocabulary learning at tertiary level. Indone-sian EFL Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-11. http://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v4i2.1370
- Aksel A. (2021). Vocabulary learning with Quizlet in higher education. Language Education and Technology (LET Journal), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53-62.
- Bilová Š. (2018). Collaborative and Individual Vocabulary Building Using ICT. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 31-48. http://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0002
- Köse T., Mede E. (2016). Perceptions of EFL learners about using an online tool for vocabulary learning in EFL classrooms: a pilot project in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 232, pp. 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.051
- Lander B. (2016). Quizlet: What the students think – a qualitative data analysis. EURO CALL, no. 12 (3), pp. 254-259. http://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.571
- Sanosi A.B. (2018). The effect of Quizlet on vocabulary acquisition. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 71-77. http://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v6i4.5446
- Wolff G.J. (2016). Quizlet Live: The classroom game now taking the world by storm. Language Teacher, issue 40.6, pp. 25-27.
- Phi T.T., Tho V.H., Thanh N.L.H., Khanh P.T. (2016). Application of quizlet.com to teaching and learning busi-ness English vocabulary at Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Development, Ho Chi Minh, pp. 230-238.
- Dizon G. (2016). Quizlet in the EFL classroom: enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of Japanese univer-sity students. Teaching English with Technology, no. 16 (2), pp. 40-56.
- Adelman C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 7-24. http://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102
- Agustín-Llach M.P., Alonso A.C. (2017). Fostering learner autonomy through vocabulary strategy training. Au-tonomy in Second Language Learning: Managing the Resources. Cham, Springer Publ., pp. 141-158. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07764-2_9
- Cunningham K.J. (2017). Quizlet for learner training and autonomy. IATEFL Learning Technologies Special Interest Group. Faversham, IATEFL Publ., pp. 123-135.
- Wright B.A. (2016). Transforming vocabulary learning with Quizlet. Transformation in Language Education. Tokyo, JALT, pp. 436-440.
- Khoii R., Sharififar S. (2013). Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT Jour-nal, vol. 67, issue 2, pp. 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs101
- Mehrpour S. (2008). A comparison of the effects of two vocabulary teaching techniques. The Asian EFL Jour-nal, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 192-209.
- Illes E. (2012). Learner autonomy revisited. ELT Journal, vol. 66, issue 4, pp. 505-513. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs044
Supplementary files
