Principles of Specialized Training Learning in the Modern Education System

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

A solid foundation for comprehensive personal development is specialized training learning, which contributes to the harmonious development of the learner, taking into account his potential, physical and mental health, through differentiation and individualization of education. The idea of specialized training learning is not new, but its relevance remains high in the current time interval. The principles underlying specialized training learning have been explored by both domestic and foreign researchers. The assessment of their relevance in a changing reality, considering the requirements of modern society and the professional environment, forms the basis of this article. In this regard, the interdependence of specialized training learning principles was established in the study, corresponding to the levels of research methodology. Two levels were identified: systemic and intrasystemic principles. A comparative analysis of the content of systemic principles made it possible to determine the list of postulates that continue to form the basis of specialized training learning, namely: the principle of democratization and humanization; the principle of adequacy and prospectiveness; the principle of integration and differentiation; the principle of variability and alternativeness. The study of intrasystemic principles enabled the formation of their structure, highlighting two components: the fundamental postulates on which teaching in heterogeneous classes is based, and the fundamental postulates on which the content of a particular academic discipline is based. The content of these principles is disclosed in the article. The principles underlying teaching in heterogeneous classes are: the principle of social interaction, the principle of acknowledging the diversity of all students. The principles underlying the content of a particular academic discipline are: the principle of aligning the educational content with the level and pace of social, economic, and societal development to achieve the set goals; the principle of accessibility of learning content for its qualitative assimilation, combined with scientific and practice-oriented components; the principle of continuity, which serves as a connecting principle, ensuring the structural integrity of education at all its stages.

About the authors

Marina Vagarshakovna Bogosyan

V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Email: m_bogosyan@mail.ru
Simferopol, Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation

References

  1. Об утверждении Концепции профильного обучения на старшей ступени общего образования: приказ Минобразования РФ от 18 июля 2002 г. № 2783. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901837067 (дата обращения: 11.02.2023).
  2. Бутакова М. В. Педагогические условия дифференцированного обучения в общеобразовательной школе: автореф. дис. … канд. пед. наук. Вологда, 1999. 24 c.
  3. Вахрушева Н. В. Принципы отбора содержания профильного курса по финансовым вычислениям для общеобразовательных учреждений // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 3: Педагогика и психология. 2008. № 7 (июль). С. 1–5.
  4. Ермолаев Е. А. Принципы отбора содержания элективных курсов по геометрии // Интеграция образования. 2008. № 3 (52). С. 97–102.
  5. Инусова Х. М., Магомедов Ш. А. Принципы структурирования содержания профильного обучения информатике // Мир науки, культуры и образования. 2017. № 2 (63). С. 145–148.
  6. Серебренников Л. Н. Содержание профильного обучения школьников // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2003. № 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/soderzhanie-profilnogo-obucheniya-shkolnikov (дата обращения: 11.06.2023).
  7. Столба М. А. Принципы отбора содержания профильного обучения иностранному языку в рамках элективных курсов // Концепт: научно-методический электронный журнал. 2012. № 7 (июль). С. 1–7.
  8. Тагариев Р. З., Шакирова М. Г., Ганеев В. В., Баланюк Н. А., Мошелев А. В., Белявская И. А. Условия и принципы организации креативной образовательной среды в условиях профильного обучения в сельской школе // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2019. № 6 (79). С. 51–54.
  9. Таранов M. C. Принципы реализации интегрированного обучения физике и информатике в профильной школе // Интеграция образования. 2008. № 3 (52). С. 19–23.
  10. Яковлев Б. П., Гейнц Л. В. Сущность и задачи профильного обучения и предпрофильной подготовки в современной системе образования // Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2008. № 6. С. 86–88.
  11. Tomlinson C. A. The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2014.
  12. Doubet K. J., Hockett J. A. Differentiation in Elementary Schools: Strategies to Engage and Equip All Learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2017.
  13. Tomlinson C. A., Sousa D. Differentiation and the Brain: How Neuroscience Supports the Learner-Friendly Classroom. Solution Tree. 2011.
  14. Pearl Subban. Differentiated instruction: A research basis // International Education Journal. 2006. Vol. 7, № 7. Р. 935–947. Shannon Research Press.
  15. Collis B., Moonen J. C. M. M. Lessons learned about technology and learning // Online Learning: Personal reflections on the transformation of education / ed. G. Kearsley. Englewood Cliffs, 2005. P. 36–46.
  16. Julia Scherba de Valenzuela, Elizabeth Kay-Raining Bird, Karisa Parkington, Pat Mirenda, Kate Cain, Andrea A. N. MacLeod, Eliane Segers. Access to Opportunities for Bilingualism for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Key informant interviews // Journal of Communication Disorders. 2016. Vol. 63. P. 32–46.
  17. Stronge J. Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: What do good teachers do? Paper presented at the American Association of School Administrators Annual Conferenceand Exposition, San Francisco, California, 2004.
  18. Mulroy H., Eddinger K. Differentiation and literacy. Paper presented at the Institute.on Inclusive Education, Rochester, 2003.
  19. Forsten C., Grant J., Hollas B. Differentiated Instruction. Different Strategies for Different Learners. Peterborough: Crystal Springs Books, 2002.
  20. McBride B. Data-driven instructional methods: «One-strategy-fits-all» doesn’t work in real classrooms // T.H.E Journal. 2004. Vol. 31, № 11. P. 38–40.
  21. Fischer K. W., Rose L. T. Webs of skill: How students learn // Educational Leadership. 2001. Vol. 59, № 3. P. 6–123.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).