Synthetic Gold Chalcogenides in the Au–Te–Se–S System and Their Natural Analogs
- Authors: Palyanova G.A.1,2, Tolstykh N.D.1,2, Zinina V.Y.1,2, Kokh K.A.1,2, Seryotkin Y.V.1,2, Bortnikov N.S.3
-
Affiliations:
- Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Novosibirsk National Research State University
- Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 487, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 929-934
- Section: Geochemistry
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1028-334X/article/view/195338
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X19080099
- ID: 195338
Cite item
Abstract
Quaternary chalcogenides of AuX (AuTe0.7Se0.2S0.1), Au3X10 (Au3Te6Se3S, Au3Te6Se2.5S1.5), and AuX2 (AuTe1.8Se0.2, AuTe1.8Se0.1S0.1) composition were synthesized for the first time in the Au‒Te‒Se‒S system, where Te ≥ Se + S. They are produced by dry synthesis upon heating a mixture of elementary substances with compositions of AuTe0.666Se0.167S0.167 (X/Au = 1, X = Σ(Te + Se + S)), AuTeSe0.5S0.5 (X/Au = 2), AuTe2Se1.125S0.375, AuTe2Se0.75S0.75 (X/Au = 3.5), and AuTe2.5SeS0.5 (X/Au = 4) in vacuum quartz ampoules from 25–700°C and annealing at 400°C. According to XRD, the synthetic Au chalcogenides of AuTe1.8(Se,S)0.2 composition correspond to calaverite (α-AuTe2). The unidentified XRD peaks belong to AuX and Au3X10. They are synthetic analogs of previously unknown natural compounds, which were found in the Gaching area of the Maletoivayam ore field (Central Kamchatka volcanic belt). The compositions of natural phases span the following ranges: Au0.99–1.00Te0.70–0.71Se0.25–0.27S0.03–0.06 and Au2.91–3.08Te5.85–6.06Se1.57–3.66S2.63–0.44. The Raman spectra of synthetic and natural Au chalcogendies close in composition are identical.
About the authors
G. A. Palyanova
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
N. D. Tolstykh
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
V. Yu. Zinina
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
K. A. Kokh
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
Yu. V. Seryotkin
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
N. S. Bortnikov
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: palyan@igm.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119017
Supplementary files
