Chronic uveal traumatization syndrome: a complete description of symptoms

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Currently, the long-term effects of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation, including uncomplicated, are more frequently identified. Uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome, also known as Ellingson syndrome, is one of these complications, but the names cannot reflect its various manifestations. This condition shows no true signs of uveitis, and glaucomatous optic neuropathy is less common than ocular hypertension. The term “chronic uveal traumatization syndrome” demonstrates the pathogenesis of this condition, namely prolonged intraocular lens trauma to the iris and/or ciliary body. It develops when the intraocular lens is located in the ciliary sulcus or naturally in the fibrous capsular bag and in case of combined fixation. Chronic uveal traumatization syndrome is most common after implantation of an intraocular lens with a sharp optical and haptic edge. The condition is characterized by periodic blurring or a sharp decrease in vision and floaters, depending on the severity and location of intraocular hemorrhage. Pain, photophobia, and eye redness are signs of secondary ocular hypertension. An early and pathognomonic sign is defects in the iris pigmented layer at the site of its contact with the intraocular lens, detected using transillumination. Intraocular hemorrhages appear as microhyphema, hyphema, and vitreous hemorrhage. Anterior chamber flare is caused by abnormalities in the blood–aqueous barrier, dispersion of pigment and blood cells. Relapses usually include corneal edema associated with ocular hypertension, toxic effects of degradating blood, and endothelial decompensation. Corneal edema is not typical for primary open-angle glaucoma, even in case of high intraocular pressure, but it does not rule out their combination. Chronic uveal traumatization syndrome is associated with pseudo-phacodonesis, capsular contraction syndrome, and intraocular lens dislocation. Rare manifestations include cystoid macular edema and glaucomatous optic neuropathy caused by secondary glaucoma. Unlike uveitis, chronic uveal traumatization syndrome is not characterized by no precipitates, hypopyon, or blurred iris pattern. Ultrasound biomicroscopy assesses the intraocular lens position (in the sulcus ciliaris, combined, or intracapsular), decentration, tilt, or deformation, capsular bag fibrosis, Soemmering ring, iris prolapse, optic or haptic contact with the iris and ciliary body. Timely diagnosis and pathogenesis-directed therapy prevent optic nerve atrophy associated with secondary glaucoma.

About the authors

Anna S. Cherkashina

Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: annaa.cherkashina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3837-7382

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vitaly V. Potemkin

Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg; Academican I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: potem@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7807-9036
SPIN-code: 3132-9163

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Sergey Yu. Astakhov

Academican I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: astakhov73@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0777-4861
SPIN-code: 7732-1150

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Irina V. Terekhova

Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg

Email: irterehova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8666-1541

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitrii F. Belov

Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg

Email: belovd1990@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0776-4065
SPIN-code: 2380-2273

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Jaffe NS. History of cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(8S): S5–16. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30760-4
  2. Sen S, Zeppieri M, Tripathy K. Uveitis glaucoma hyphema syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publ.; 2025. PMID: 35593837
  3. Zemba M, Camburu G. Uveitis–glaucoma–hyphaema syndrome. General review. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2017;61(1):11–17. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2017.3
  4. Ramakrishnan MS, Wald KJ. Current concepts of the uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema (UGH) syndrome. Curr Eye Res. 2023;48(6):529–535. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2156547
  5. Accorinti M, Saturno MC, Paroli MP, et al. Uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome: clinical features and differential diagnosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022;30(6):1408–1413. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2021.1881563
  6. Ellingson FT. The uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome associated with the Mark VIII anterior chamber lens implant. J Am Intra-Ocul Implant Soc. 1978;4(2):50–53. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(78)80054-8
  7. Siepser SB, Kline OR Jr. Scanning electron microscopy of removed intraocular lenses. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1983;9(2):176–183. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(83)80034-2
  8. Apple DJ, Mamlis N, Loftfield K, et al. Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;29(1):1–54. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90113-9
  9. Belov DF, Nikolaenko VP, Shuvaev DA, et al. The uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome. Part 1. Pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis. Ophthalmology Reports. 2024;17(2):31–39. doi: 10.17816/OV626405 EDN: VUKSVG
  10. Jasinskas V, Vaiciuliene R, Varoniukaite A, Speckauskas M. Novel microsurgical management of uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(7):1607–1612. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0972-5
  11. Bryant TK, Feinberg EE, Peeler CE. Uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome secondary to a Soemmerring ring. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):985–987. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.002
  12. Thakur M, Bhatia P, Chandrasekhar G, Senthil S. Recurrent uveitis and pigment dispersion in an eye with in-the-bag acrylic foldable intraocular lens. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2015213968. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213968
  13. Mamalis N. Explantation of intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(4):289–295. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200008000-00011
  14. Foroozan R, Tabas JG, Moster ML. Recurrent microhyphema despite intracapsular fixation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(8):1632–1635. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00122-6
  15. Egorova EV, Malyugin BE, Uzunian DG, Polyanskaya EG. Initial changes of capsular bag after phacoemulsification with implantation intraocular lens by means ultrasound biomicroscopy. The Siberian scientific medical journal. 2009;(4):12–15. EDN: KZRFGV
  16. Egorova EV, Polyanskaya EG, Morozova TA, et al. Acoustic morphology of cataract capsule contracture. OSU Bulletin. 2011;(14):104–107. EDN: PCGXZN (In Russ.)
  17. Scholl S, Kirchhof J, Augustin AJ. Pathophysiology of macular edema. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(S1):8–15. doi: 10.1159/000315155
  18. Chu CJ, Johnston RL, Buscombe C, et al. Risk factors and incidence of macular edema after cataract surgery: A database study of 81 984 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(2):316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.001
  19. Wintle R, Austin M. Pigment dispersion with elevated intraocular pressure after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(4):642–644. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00792-6
  20. Chen TC, Jurkunas U, Chodosh J. A patient with glaucoma with corneal edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(8):917–918. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1023
  21. Mehta R, Aref AA. Intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus: Challenges and risks. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2317–2323. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S205148
  22. Potyomkin VV, Ageeva EV. Zonular instability in patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome: the analysis of 1000 consecutive phacoemulsifications. Ophthalmology Reports. 2018;11(1):41–46. doi: 10.17816/OV11141-46 EDN: YVLXBA
  23. Potemkin VV. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome without concomitant increase in intraocular pressure: comprehensive examination and surgical rehabilitation [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2024. 343 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Pillai MR, Balasubramaniam N, Wala N, et al. Glaucoma in uveitic eyes: Long-term clinical course and management measures. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024;32(6):1041–1047. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2202740
  25. Seow WH, Lim CHL, Lim BXH, Lim DK-A. Uveitis and glaucoma: a look at present day surgical options. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(2):152–161. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000940
  26. Lippera M, Nicolosi C, Vannozzi L, et al. The role of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(4):2211–2218. doi: 10.1177/11206721211063738
  27. Piette S, Canlas OA, Tran HV, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(6): 839–841. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01386-7
  28. De Simone L, Mautone L, Aldigeri R, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024;32(9):2085–2091. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2323094

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).