Associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older: data from the Russian EVKALIPT Study

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Background: Currently, the number of elderly and senile patients is steadily increasing. Physical frailty significantly worsens prognosis in this population, making the evaluation of its relationship with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors a pertinent area of study.

Aim: To examine the associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older.

Materials and methods: A sub-analysis of the EVKALIPT study included 2,553 outpatient patients aged 65 and older (mean age 76.9 years, 32.2% men). Participants were divided into three age subgroups: 65–74 years, 75–84 years, and 85 years and older. A two-stage comprehensive geriatric assessment was conducted: the first stage involved a questionnaire on socio-economic status, and the second stage involved an objective examination using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Physical frailty was defined based on SPPB results as follows: 10–12 points indicated no frailty (“robust” patients), 8–9 points indicated pre-frailty (“pre-frail” patients), and ≤ 7 points indicated physical frailty.

Results: Total SPPB scores ranged from 0 to 12 (median 7, interquartile range 4–9), with the prevalence of physical frailty at 58%. Patients with physical frailty had poorer socio-economic status. Multivariate regression analysis identified eight independent factors associated with physical frailty: age (per year), female sex, absence of a partner, disability, educational level as an ordinal variable (1 to 6, where 1 is no education and 6 is a doctoral degree), past blood donation, continued employment, and material resources as an ordinal variable (1 to 3, where 1 is low and 3 is high).

Conclusions: In outpatient patients aged 65 and older, physical frailty is associated with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors. High levels of education, past blood donation, continued employment, and high material resources were found to have a protective effect against physical frailty.

作者简介

Natalya Sharashkina

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: sharashkina@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6465-4842
SPIN 代码: 7695-0360

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Natalya Vorobyeva

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: natalyavorobjeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6021-7864
SPIN 代码: 3269-1397

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Andrey Izyumov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: v.jugularis@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7815-4104
SPIN 代码: 8299-2360

MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Madina Balaeva

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: m.balaeva94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1969-8923
SPIN 代码: 1297-1136

MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Anastasia Sorokina

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: awsorokina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-4697-4417
SPIN 代码: 3006-8606

MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Nadezhda Runikhina

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: nkrunihina@rgnkc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5272-0454
SPIN 代码: 7127-1801

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Yulia Kotovskaya

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: kotovskaya@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1628-5093
SPIN 代码: 5698-8983

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

Olga Tkacheva

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: tkacheva@rgnkc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4193-688X
SPIN 代码: 6129-5809

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Российский геронтологический научно-клинический центр

俄罗斯联邦, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226

参考

  1. Gu D, Andreev K, Dupre M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3(28):604–613. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
  2. Cieza A, Sabariego C, Bickenbach J, et al. Rethinking disability. BMC Medicine. 2018;1(16):14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6
  3. Davydov EL, Tikhonova NV, Glushanko VS, et al. Asthenic syndrome in elderly people: diagnostic, treatment and rehabilitation trends. Siberian medical review. 2020;5(125):40–48. EDN: HNGCTO doi: 10.20333/2500136-2020-5-40-48
  4. Courtwright AM, Zaleski D, Tevald M, et al. Discharge frailty following lung transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(10):e13694. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13694
  5. Clinical guidelines Senile asthenia. 2024. [Internet]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/613_2?ysclid=m4k3eu547b846032772 . Accessed: 04 July 2024. (In Russ.)
  6. Jung HW, Baek JY, Jang IY, et al. Short physical performance battery as a crosswalk between frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(12):2249–2255. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab087
  7. Wang X, Hu J, Wu D. Risk factors for frailty in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(34):e30169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030169
  8. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines on frailty. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(1):11–46. EDN: JCMOSK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46
  9. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines frailty. Part 2. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(2):115–130. EDN: SLCYCK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2020-115-130
  10. Vorob’eva NM, Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, et al. Russian epidemiological study evkalipt: protocol and basic characteristics of participants. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2021;(1):35–43. EDN: OSMVEM doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2021-35-43
  11. Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox? Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;179:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004
  12. Oksuzyan A, Juel K, Vaupel JW, et al. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(2):91–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03324754
  13. Park C, Ko FC. The science of frailty: sex differences. Clin Geriatr Med. 2021;37(4):625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008
  14. Kojima G, Aoyama R, Tanabe M. Associations between social isolation and physical frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(11):e3–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.012
  15. Gale CR, Westbury L, Cooper C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):392–397. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx188
  16. Chastin S, Gardiner PA, Harvey JA, et al. Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(6):CD012784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012784.pub2
  17. Kojima G, Walters K, Iliffe S, et al. Marital status and risk of physical frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017
  18. Trevisan C, Grande G, Vetrano DL, et al. Gender differences in the relationship between marital status and the development of frailty: A Swedish Longitudinal Population-Based Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(7):927–936. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8095
  19. Sirotko ML, Denisenko MB, Zolotovskaya IA, Komarova MV. Medical and social status of patients over 80 years old subject to single or joint residence. Advances in Gerontology. 2021;34(3):446–453. EDN: QXDBKT doi: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.015
  20. Sampaio LS, Carneiro JAO, Coqueiro RDS, Fernandes MH. Indicadores antropométricos como preditores na determinação da fragilidade em idosos. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(12):4115–4124. (In Portuguese). doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172212.05522016
  21. Closs VE, Ziegelmann PK, Flores JHF, et al. Anthropometric measures and frailty prediction in the elderly: an easy-to-use tool. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017;2017:8703503. doi: 10.1155/2017/8703503
  22. Bellelli F, Consorti E, Hettiarachchige TMK, et al. Relationship among age, education and frailty in older persons. J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(4):326–328. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.39

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of outpatients aged 65 years and older depending on the short-physical performance battery score (n = 2553)

下载 (128KB)
3. Fig. 2. The prevalence of physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 years and older, depending on the age group

下载 (79KB)

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2024


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).