7. Baumeister Fr. Chr. Institutiones philosophiae rationales method Wolfii conscriptae. Wittenberg, 1735. 388 p. 8. Baumeister Fr. Chr. Elementa philosophiae recentioris usibus juventutis scholasticae accommodata. Gleditsch, 1747. 550 p. 9. Purchotii E. Institutiones philosophicae ad faciliorem veterum ac recentiorum philosophorum intelligentiam comparatae. Tomus primus. Complecteas Logicam et Metaphysicam. Paris, 1695. 306 p.
- Authors: Alekseeva A.S1
-
Affiliations:
- Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 4, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 26-31
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2949-4656/article/view/378882
- ID: 378882
Cite item
Abstract
in the middle of the 18th century Makarii Petrovich wrote a new work on logic (in one of the copies, it is titled ‘Logic, compiled from various authors and conveniently arranged in Russian for use in Moscow in 1758 by the Moscow Academy preacher and hieromonk Makarii’), based on the Latin works of F. H. Baumeister and E. Pourchot. The text of the manual is written in a literary language that combines elements of Church Slavonic and Russian languages. Petrovich’s work contains the 17 new terms, which are used for the first time. The identifying new lexemes was carried out with «Dictionary of Old Russian Language of the 11th–14th Centuries», «Dictionary of Russian Language of the 11th–17th Centuries», «Dictionary of Russian Language of the 18th Century» and their card indexes, etymological dictionaries and the Russian National Corpus. The identified lexemes can be divided into three groups: philological (omonism, skholij (skholiya?), tropologicheskij) and philosophical (apagogicheskij, dogmatiko-scientifichnyj, erotematicheskij, ermevticheskij, logomahiya, sinkategorematichnyj, tetralemma, trilemma) terms and names of sciences (votanologiya, dendrologiya, kozmologiya, oriktologiya, teleologiya, hidrologiya). In some cases, despite the fact that Petrovich has the Latin text in front of him, he uses Modern Greek pronunciation. In particular, this applies to the reading of the letter ? as [v] (votanologiya) and the voicing of ? (kozmologiya), as well as the non-transmission of aspiration (omonism, ermevticheskij).
Keywords
About the authors
A. S Alekseeva
Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-4613
References
- Алексеева А.С. Терминология и толкование в «Логике» Макария П?тровича // Логические исследования. 2023. Т. 29. № 1. С. 30 – 42.
- Гончарко О.Ю., Семиколенных М.В. Лексические особенности терминологического аппарата в «Логике» Макария Пe?тровича // Логические исследования / Logical Investigations. 2022. T. 28. № 1. С. 60 – 75.
- Национальный корпус русского языка [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru (дата обращения: 03.07.2025)
- ОР ГИМ. Собрание Е.В. Барсова. Ед. хр. 2149. Логика. 113 л.
- ОР РНБ. Ф. 573 (СПбДА). Ед. хр. 206. Логика. 122 л.
- ОР РНБ. Ф. 550 (ОСРК). Ед. хр. Q.III.186. Логика. 149 л.
- Baumeister Fr. Chr. Institutiones philosophiae rationales method Wolfii conscriptae. Wittenberg, 1735. 388 p.
- Baumeister Fr. Chr. Elementa philosophiae recentioris usibus juventutis scholasticae accommodata. Gleditsch, 1747. 550 p.
- Purchotii E. Institutiones philosophicae ad faciliorem veterum ac recentiorum philosophorum intelligentiam comparatae. Tomus primus. Complecteas Logicam et Metaphysicam. Paris, 1695. 306 p.
Supplementary files

