Evaluation of Contemporary Art in the Process of Production, Distribution and Consumption
- Authors: Lopatkova A.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- HSE University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 28-50
- Section: Field Work Research
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2687-0401/article/view/268247
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.1.2
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HKCKRZ
- ID: 268247
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
How does the art community evaluate contemporary art? This question is discussed based on 16 interviews with artists, gallery owners, curators, and collectors. The contemporary art market is conceptualized as a “creative industry that unites actors involved in the production, distribution, and consumption of art objects. The research methodology is based on the anthropological approach of Igor Kopytoff and the discursive psychology of Rom Harré, according to which the history of the movement of cultural objects through social space and the discourses accompanying them are sources of symbolic values. Market practices of art distribution are described: criteria for selecting artists by galleries, legal aspects of distribution and consumption of art objects, informal purchasing practices, moral and pragmatic taboos on buying art objects. Four logics of justifying the value of art objects — “commercial success,” “testimony of the times,” “intellectual development,” “emotional experience”—have been reconstructed. It is demonstrated that consumption as a collector's practice requires following the rules of a “professional approach” to be recognized in the art community.
About the authors
Alisa Romanovna Lopatkova
HSE University
Email: arlopatkova@edu.hse.ru
MA student, Master’s Programme “Complex Social Analysis” Moscow, Russia
References
- Бердышева Е. Социологи о ценности и цене рыночных товаров // Экономическая социология. 2012. Т. 13. № 3. С. 134–145. EDN: OZFBLD
- Вельтус О. Символические значения цены: конструирование ценности современного искусства в галереях Амстердама и Нью-Йорка // Экономическая социология. 2008. Т. 9. № 3. С. 33–59. EDN: OYNZDZ
- Зелизер В. Человеческие ценности и рынок: страхование жизни и смерть в Америке XIX века // Экономическая социология. 2010. Т. 11. № 2. С. 54–72.
- Канеман Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро. М.: АСТ, 2016.
- Копытофф И. Культурная биография вещей: товаризация как процесс // Социология вещей / Под ред. В. Вахштайнм. М.: Издательский дом «Территория будущего», 2006. С. 134–166. EDN: PPNXXN
- Страус А., Корбин Дж. Основы качественного исследования: обоснованная теория, процедуры и техники / Пер. с англ. Т.С. Васильевой. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2001.
- Харре Р. Материальные объекты в социальных мирах // Социология вещей / Под ред. В. Вахштайнм. М.: Издательский дом «Территория будущего», 2006. С. 118–133. EDN: TMXXIJ
- Фархатдинов Н.Г. Искусство как товар: старые и новые исследовательские перспективы // Экономическая социология. 2011. Т. 12. № 3. С. 127–144. EDN: OYTSMH
- Beckert J. The Social Order of Markets // Theory and Society. 2009. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 245–269. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464441
- Callon M., Muniesa F. Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices // Organization Studies. 2005. Vol. 26. № 8. P. 1229–1250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393
- Caves R.E. Contracts Between Art and Commerce // The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2003. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 73–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533003765888430
- Hanquinet L. “But is it good?” Why Aesthetic Values Matter in Sociological Accounts of Tastes // Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/jcasc/3990
- Karpik L. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton: University Press, 2010.
- Kompatsiaris P. Curators, Words and Values: the Branding Economies of Curatorial Statements in Art Biennials // Journal of Cultural Economy. 2020. Vol. 13. № 6. P. 758–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2020.1716825
- Stewart S. Aesthetics and Time: Sustained and Distracted Modes of Engagement // Cultural Sociology. 2015. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 147–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514557549
- Stewart S. Evaluative Judgements: Ethics, Aesthetics and “Bad Taste” // The Sociological Review. 2017. Vol. 65. № 1. P. 37–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12360
- Vogl E.R., Pekrun R., Loderer K. “Epistemic Emotions and Metacognitive Feelings” // Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research across the Life Span / Ed. by D. Moraitou, P. Metallidou. Cham: Springer, 2021. P. 41–58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51673-4_3
- Wohl H. Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment // Sociological Theory. 2015. Vol. 33. № 4. P. 299–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617800
- Wohl H. Innovation and Creativity in Creative Industries // Sociology Compass. 2021. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12956
- Wohl H. Creative Visions: Presenting Aesthetic Trajectories in Artistic Careers // Poetics. 2019. Vol. 76. P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.03.003
- Wohl H. Performing Aesthetic Confidence: How Contemporary Art Collectors Maintain Status // Socio-Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 215–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz041
- Yogev T. The Social Construction of Quality: Status Dynamics in the Market for Contemporary Art // Socio-Economic Review. 2010. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 511–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp030
Supplementary files



