Terminological discussion in modern psychology on the phenomenon of "digital Generation Z"
- Authors: Ryzhkova M.I.1, Rychkova L.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- South Ural State University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 542-561
- Section: Psychological Studies
- Published: 28.02.2025
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2658-4034/article/view/301050
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-1-780
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZUFDOO
- ID: 301050
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. In the mid-20th century, the widespread information technology revolution led to the appearance of numerous studies into the emerging phenomenon of "digital generation". The scientific literature presents many variations that define and name the subjects living in the described period of time in different ways. Different views on the definition of this generation among foreign and domestic scientists indicate the ambiguity of understanding and the complexity of this phenomenon.
Aim. The article aims to explore the conceptual field of the phenomenon of “digital generation" and highlight the key characteristics inherent in the generation.
Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study is framed by comparative analysis, synthesis, and generalization of scientific papers on the research problem.
Results. The analysis of professional literature allowed the authors to interpret the existing terms and identify six groups of terms with the key characteristics of the "digital generation Z": "Having an online identity"; "Technologically advanced"; "Generation of unlimited access to information"; "Motivated to frequent refocusing"; "Constantly Internet-connected"; "Homebodies". The ability of university lecturers to know and understand the characteristics of generation Z students is becoming a certain key to achieving effective learning.
About the authors
Maria I. Ryzhkova
South Ural State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: mariryzhk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-0352-7211
SPIN-code: 3310-4823
Graduate Student, Assistant Department of General Psychology, Psychological Diagnosis and Counseling
Russian Federation, 76, Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian FederationLidia S. Rychkova
South Ural State University
Email: rychkovaly@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7280-0723
SPIN-code: 3284-0250
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Psychological Diagnostics and Consulting
Russian Federation, 76, Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian FederationReferences
- Dutko, Yu. A. (2020). Generation Z: Basic Concepts, Characteristics, and Recent Studies. Problems of Modern Education, 4, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.31862/2218-8711-2020-4-28-37
- Levada, Yu. A. (2001). Generations of the 20th Century: Research Opportunities. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5), 7–14.
- Miroshkina, M. R. (Ed.) (2015). Methods for Studying Basic Characteristics of Participants in the Modern Educational Process: Scientific and Methodological Manual. Moscow: Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Institute of Information Technologies and Distance Education of the Russian Academy of Education. 95 p.
- Popov, N. P. (2018). Russian and American Generations of the 20th Century: Where Do Millennials Come From? Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.15
- Skoblik, O. N. (2019). Generational Theory as a Tool for Analyzing Development and Formation of Personality. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, (63-1), 472–474.
- Smirnov, R. G. (2019). Operationnalization of the Phenomenon "Generation Online". Digital Sociology, 2(4), 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-4-31-38
- Tsymbalenko, S. B., Sharikov, A., Zhilavskaya, I., Mayorova-Shcheglova, S., & Makeev, P. (2013). Monitoring and Analysis of the Moscow Information-Educational Environment: Findings of Sociological Studies and Programming. Moscow: Publishing Centre MGGU named after M. A. Sholokhov. 108 p.
- Shaykhislav, R. B. (Ed.) (2021). Z: Variety of Identities, Orientations, Behaviors: Collective Monograph. Ufa: Research and Innovation Centre of Bashkir State University. 228 p. https://doi.org/10.14258/genz.2021
- Shestakova, I. (2017). Living Witnesses of the Pre-Internet Era. Society. Environment. Development, (1), 47–51.
- Cochrane, R. (2021). A Case Study Examining Japanese University Students' Digital Literacy and Perceptions of Digital Tools for Academic English Language Learning (PhD dissertation). Lancaster. 186 p. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert_Cochrane-3
- Dolot, A. (2018). The Characteristics of Generation Z. e-mentor, 2(74), 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351
- Fuentes, G. (2014). Pedagogy With and Against the Flow: Generational Shifts, Social Media, and the Gen Z Brain. In Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA): Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions (pp. 669–677). Retrieved from https://www.acsaarch.org/proceedings/Annual_Meeting_Proceedings/ACSA.AM.102/ACSA.AM.102.76.pdf (Accessed August 15, 2024).
- Hendrastomo, G., & Januarti, N. (2023). The Characteristics of Generation Z Students and Implications for Future Learning Methods. Journal of Education: Journal of Research and Bibliographic Studies in Education, Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 484–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7745
- Jayatissa, K. (2023). Generation Z – A New Lifeline: A Systematic Literature Review. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 179–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljssh.v3i2.110
- Linke, K. (2011). Generation Facebook? A History of Social Networks. Paper presented at Global Business Management Research Conference, Fulda, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270281872_generation_facebook_-_the_history_of_social_networks (Accessed August 15, 2024).
- Mertala, P., Lopez-Pernas, S., Vartiainen, H., Saqr, M., & Tedre, M. (2023). Digital Natives in the Scientific Literature: A Topic Modeling Approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 152(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108076
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5–6), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
- Wallis, C. (2006). The Multitasking Generation. Time South Pacific, 167(13), 48–55. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-multitasking-generation.-Wallis/a7d22eefb05f7084dacb7991f6eb8cded839ac3b (Accessed August 15, 2024).
- White, D. S., & Cornu, A. L. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement. First Monday, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
- Żarczyńska-Dobiesz, A., & Chomątowska, B. (2014). Generation Z in the Labor Market – Challenges for Human Resource Management. Wrocław University of Economics Publishing, 350, 405–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.350.36
Supplementary files
