Procedural features of detention of a person
- Authors: Eltsov V.N.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- The Prosecutor’s Office of the Soviet District of Tambov
- Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
- Issue: Vol 2, No 6 (2018)
- Pages: 70-78
- Section: Процессуальное право
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2587-9340/article/view/366345
- ID: 366345
Cite item
Abstract
Considered the problems of the essence of detention of a suspect in criminal proceedings. This institution is observed as one of the measures of procedural coercion, limiting the rights and freedoms of the individual. Its application is possible with strict observance of established procedural forms and guarantees. Analyzed various approaches to the definition of the essence of detention, its place in the system of measures of procedural coercion. A legislative distinction between criminal procedure and administrative detention is necessary in order to respect the law and protect the rights of citizens. From the moment of detention of the suspect, initiated the criminal case and criminal prosecution begins. The detention of a suspect as a measure of criminal prosecution should be distinguished from the “capture of a person” and the delivery of it by police officers to a law enforcement agency. Analyzed the essence of the concept “detained”, offered its fixing in the criminal procedural legislation. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of part 1 and part 2 of article 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which contains the grounds for detention. It is proposed to establish an exhaustive list of such grounds in the Criminal Procedure Code in order to prevent disputes in the practical activities of law enforcement agencies. The calculation of the period of detention must begin from the moment of actual detainment of the person.
About the authors
Vladimir Nikolaevich Eltsov
The Prosecutor’s Office of the Soviet District of Tambov; Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Author for correspondence.
Email: kandydat1@yandex.ru
Prosecutor; Candidate of Jurisprudence, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Process DepartmentRussian Federation, 5 Michurinskaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation; 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation
References
- Melnikov V.Y. Primenenie mer presecheniya v otnoshenii podozrevaemykh i obvinyaemykh [Application of preventive measures against suspects and accused persons]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya – Russian Judge, 2007, no. 7, pp. 29-34. (In Russian).
- Lutsenko O.A., Gemeshlieva I.F. Zaderzhanie. Ponyatie, sushchnost', dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie dannogo pravovogo instituta [Detention. Concept, essence, evidentiary value of this legal institute]. Severo-Kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik – North Caucasus Legal Vestnik, 2016, no. 2, pp. 118-122. (In Russian).
- Rossinskiy S.B. K voprosu o sushchnosti i pravovoy prirode zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [To the question of the legal nature of a suspect detention in criminal proceedings]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of the Russian Law], 2017, no. 1 (74), pp. 174-185. (In Russian).
- Frantsiforov Y.V., Ovchinnikova N.O. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo [Legal regulation of the arrest of the suspect]. Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyy protsess – Judicial Authority and Criminal Process, 2016, no. 1, pp. 134-137. (In Russian).
- Petrukhin I.L. Neprikosnovennost' lichnosti i prinuzhdenie v ugolovnom protsesse [The Inviolability of the Person and Duress in the Criminal Process]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, 256 p. (In Russian).
- Shepeleva O.R., Kievskiy V.V. Problemy realizatsii prav podozrevaemogo pri zaderzhanii [Problems of realization of the rights of the suspect during detention]. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Leningrad Law Journal, 2017, no. 1 (47), pp. 190-197. (In Russian).
- Rudnev V.I. Status zaderzhannogo kak novogo uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Status of a detainee as a new participant in criminal proceedings]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 4 (244), pp. 130-137. (In Russian).
Supplementary files


