To the question about the types of representation in the civil process

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Analyzed the doctrinal ideas about the types of representation in the civil process. It is emphasized that there are different variations of division of judicial representation into types. Besides, the conventional differentiation of representation by figures of legal science is complemented with other types. Those circumstances led to the conviction of the importance of a classification that more fully reveals the institution of judicial representation. In this regard the relevance of the matter doesn't raise doubts. The aim of the study was to form a complete picture of the types of representation in the civil process. The complex theoretical and practical study of the topic was carried out with the use of general scientific (logical (induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis), systemic and functional) and private law (historical and legal, formal legal, comparative legal) methods. On the basis of the conducted research revealed the classifications of judicial representation offered by different scientists. It is noticed that the above classifications of procedural representation combines a common feature – the basis of occurrence. Therefore, in connection with the obtained results of scientific work, it is concluded that it is necessary to group the types of judicial representation into legal, voluntary and specialized for the purpose of their full and detailed study, as well as to build a holistic view of the institution of representation in the civil process.

About the authors

Edik Samvelovich Aloyan

Saratov State Law Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: k_arb2@ssla.ru

Post-Graduate Student, Department of Arbitration on Procedure

Russian Federation, 1 Volskaya St., Saratov 410056, Russian Federation

References

  1. Gordon A. Predstavitel'stvo v grazhdanskom prave [Representation in Civil Law]. St. Petersburg, Schroeder Printing House, 1879, 434 p. (In Russian).
  2. Ryasentsev V.A. Predstavitel'stvo v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: v 2 t. [Representation in the Soviet Civil Law. Dr. jurid. sci. diss.: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, 1948, vol. 1, 238 p. (In Russian).
  3. Voytovich L.V. Vidy predstavitel'stva po normam Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Types of representations according to the norms of Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Amur State University, 2009, no. 44, pp. 79-82. (In Russian).
  4. Vlasov A.A. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil Procedure]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 2012, 548 p. (In Russian).
  5. Yarkov V.V. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil Procedure]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2004, 687 p. (In Russian).
  6. Kolokolova E.E. Predstavitel'stvo v grazhdanskom protsesse: vidy, sub"ekty, osnovaniya i formy [Representation in the civil procedure: types, subjects, bases and forms]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2003, no. 1, pp. 2-7. (In Russian).
  7. Salogubova E.V. Predstavitel'stvo v sude [Representation in court]. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil Procedure]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2014, 960 p. (In Russian).
  8. Larchenkova M. Upolnomochennye predstaviteli v sude [Authorized representatives in court]. Ezh-Yurist, 2016, 25 March.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Aloyan E.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).