Planned Indirect Communication as a Way of Programming Interpretation of Meanings in American Political Discourse (based on the inaugural speeches of US presidents)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article is devoted to indirect communication strategies that require further interpretation of the inaugural addresses of the US presidents of the 21st century. Being the task of the recipient, the process of interpretation becomes an act of co-creation and adopts a strategic role in American political discourse. The cognitive-interpretive approach to the investigation into indirect communication means allowed us to determine that they are used as a method of programming the recipient’s interpretation in the way necessary for the author.

Авторлар туралы

Anastasia Ustyantseva

Moscow State Linguistic University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: val_88@bk.ru

PhD Student, Department of English Stylistics, Faculty of the English Language, Lecturer, Department of the Second Foreign Language

Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Dementev, V. V. (2006). Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya = Indirect communication. Moscow: Gnozis. (In Russ.)
  2. Shakhovskiy, V. I., Ionova, S. V. (2004). Review on the book: Dementev, V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya. Saratov: College, 2003. Stylistyka, 13, 372–383. (In Russ.)
  3. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoy krug: lichnost`, konzepty, diskurs = Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. (In Russ.)
  4. Olyanich, А. V. (2004). Presentatsionnaya teoriya diskursa = Presentational discourse theory . Volgograd: Paradigma. (In Russ.)
  5. Vereshchagina, N. О., Bulatova, E. V. (2014). Indirect Communication Linguistic Means in the Dm. Sokolov-Mitrich’s Media Texts. Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1, Issues in education, science and culture, 4(132), 19–28. (In Russ.)
  6. Bulatova, E. V. (2005). Pryamaya i kosvennaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennoy rossiyskoy pechatnoy reklame = Direct and indirect communication in modern Russian printed advertisements: PhD in Philology. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.)
  7. Dijk, T. A. van. (1998). What is political discourse analysis? In Blommaert, J., Bulcaen, C. (eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 34–35). Amsterdam.
  8. Sheigal, E. I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa = Semiotics of political discourse: Senior Doctorate in Philology. Volgograd. (In Russ.)
  9. Gerasimenko, N. А. (1998). Informatsiya i fastsinatsiya v politicheskom diskurse (k voprosu o funktsionirovanii bisubstantivnykh predlozheniy) = Information and fascination in political discourse (the issue of functions of bisubstantial sentences). In Sorokin, Yu. A., Bazylev, V. N. (eds.), Political discourse in Russia – 2 (pp. 20–23): materials of the workshop, Moscow, 29 March 1998. Мoscow: Dialog-MGU. (In Russ.)
  10. Crystall, D. (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).