Associative Field Indexes as Parameters of Speech Action Research: Towards the Formation of a Method
- Авторлар: Pishchalnikova V.A.1,2
-
Мекемелер:
- INION RAS
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Шығарылым: № 8(902) (2025)
- Беттер: 19-27
- Бөлім: Linguistics
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2542-2197/article/view/309067
- ID: 309067
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The purpose of the study is to substantiate the position according to which a set of predication features between a stimulus and a reaction can become the basis for algorithmic analysis of associative fields of words. The theoretical relevance of the research is related to the need to develop the theory of speech action, initiated by the works of A.A. Leontiev, and the importance of streamlining methodological procedures for analyzing the array of associates available in modern linguistics. The author suggests using a number of qualitative and quantitative indices in the analysis of reactions obtained experimentally, reflecting the essential aspects of the association process and significant connections of reactions, revealing the structure of the associative-verbal network. The paper also demonstrates the procedure of using indices in establishing diachronic changes in the meaningful connections between a stimulus and a reaction.
Авторлар туралы
Vera Pishchalnikova
INION RAS; Moscow State Linguistic University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: pishchalnikova@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Psycholinguistics, Moscow State Linguistic University; Chief Researcher at INION RAS
РесейӘдебиет тізімі
- Dmitrjuk, N. V. (2000). Associative portraits-characteristics of representatives of Russian and Kazakh ethnic groups (pp. 248–260): Jazykovoe soznanie i obraz mira: sbornik nauchnyj statej (In Russ.)
- Zakorko, S. V. (2012). Free associative experiment as the main method of psycholinguistic research. The Science of the person: humanitarian researches, 1(9), 105–109. (In Russ.)
- Zalevskaja, A. A. (2014). What’s behind the word? Questions of the interface theory of the word. Moscow – Berlin: Direkt-Media. (In Russ.)
- Ufimceva, N. V. (2014). Associative dictionary as a model of the linguistic worldview. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 9, 340–346. (In Russ.)
- Kurganova, N. I. (2019). Associative experiment as a method of studying the meaning of a living word. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 3(4), 24–37. (In Russ.)
- Sternin, I. A. (2022). Lexicographic and experimental description of linguistic meaning. Journal of psycholinguistics, 1(51), 112–121. (In Russ.)
- Pishhal’nikova, V. A. (2020). Experimental psycholinguistic study of the meaning of a word: unresolved problems. Proceedings of the South-West state university. Linguistics and Pedagogy Series, 10 (1), 17–30. (In Russ.)
- Kardanova-Birjukova, K. S. (2023). Semiosis of natural communication: determinants in variability. Vestnik of Mos cow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 9(877), 49–56. (In Russ.)
- Stepykin, N. I. (2016). Associative field: a product of an associative experiment and a tool for analyzing the meaning of a word. Proceedings of the South-West state university. Linguistics and Pedagogy Series, 3, 110–115. (In Russ.)
- Stepykin, N. I. (2021). The potential of using formalized parameters for modeling speech action. Scientific Dia logue, 8, 112–127. (In Russ.)
- Pishhal’nikova, V. A. et al. (2019). Associativnyj jeksperiment: teoreticheskie i prikladnye perspektivy psiholingvis tiki =Associative experiment: theoretical and applied perspectives of psycholinguistics. Ed. by V. A. Pishhal’nikova. Moscow: R-Valent. (In Russ.)
- Pishhal’nikova, V. A., Stepykin, N. I. (2024). Speech action as a semantic component of communication: psycholin guistic parameters of analysis. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 23(3), 6–16. (In Russ.)
- Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237–260.
- Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., Leibert, T. W. (1997). One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 25, 785–796.
- Levickij, V. V., Sternin, I. A. (1989). Jeksperimental’nye metody v semasiologii. = Experimental methods in semasiol ogy. Voronezh: Izdatelstvo VGU. (In Russ.)
- Ahutina, T. V. (2007). The Leontiev–Ryabova speech generation model: 1967–2005. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6, 13–27. (In Russ.)
- Karaulov, Yu. N. (2002). Russkij associativnyj slovar’ kak novyj lingvisticheskij istochnik i instrument analiza jazyk ovoj sposobnosti = Russian Associative Dictionary as a new linguistic source and a tool for analyzing linguistic ability. In Karaulov, Yu. N. et al. Russian Associative Dictionary (vol. 1, pp. 191–218): in 2 vols. Moscow: AST: Astrel’. (In Russ.)
- Ahutina, T. V. (2022). The Vygotsky School Model of Speech generation: fundamentals and verification. Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series, 164(1-2), 7–27. (In Russ.)
- Bates, E. (1976). Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York, Acad. Press.
- Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2(1), 1–19.
- Bruner, J. S. (1984). The ontogenesis of speech acts. In Psycholinguistics (pp. 21–49). Moscow: Progress.
Қосымша файлдар
