Email this article The dualistic model of independent control over information and confidentiality: Canada's experience and prospects for implementation in Russia
- Authors: Gorokhova S.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 21, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 187-192
- Section: Public Law (State and Legal Sciences)
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2541-8025/article/view/381362
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-6-187-192
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QEVDLM
- ID: 381362
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the activities of Canada's two independent parliamentary institutions, the Information Commissioner and the Privacy Commissioner. The article examines their legal status and key powers that ensure a balance between transparency of state power and protection of the right to privacy. Based on the comparative legal method, an assessment of the current state of control in the information sphere in Russia is given, and systemic problems of the Russian model related to the lack of specialized independent ombudsmen and the dominance of departmental control are identified. In conclusion, the expediency is substantiated and specific proposals are formulated for adapting elements of the Canadian «dualistic model» in Russia.
About the authors
Svetlana S. Gorokhova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: swettalana@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4919-1093
SPIN-code: 6729-3375
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of International and Public Law of the Faculty of Law
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Melnichuk M.A. Canada's experience in legal regulation of access to information. Gaps in Russian legislation. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 23–26. (In Rus.). EDN: SMYORT.
- Ryabtseva E.E., Trizno T.A. The State information policy of Canada: the political and legal aspect of regulation. The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture. 2013. № 3(36). Pp. 139–147. (In Rus.). EDN: RCDNPJ.
- Afanasyeva O.V. Institute of the Information Commissioner: the Canadian experience for Russia. Bulletin of the Volga Academy of Public Administration. 2009. № 4 (21). Pp. 44–51. (In Rus.). EDN: PFCKVB.
- Mochalov A.N. On the establishment in Russia of the post of Commissioner for the protection of human rights in the field of information and telecommunication technologies. The Rule of Law: Theory and Practice. 2022. № 2 (68). Pp. 27–39. (In Rus.). doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2022.2.3. EDN: VNUXLR.
- Shelepov A.V. Approaches of the BRICS countries to data regulation. Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy. 2022. Vol. 17, No. 3. Pp. 212–234. (In Rus.). doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-09. EDN: ZWCONA.
- Dudko I.G. Institute for the Protection of Human Rights (Ombudsman) in Canada. Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA). 2021. № 4 (80). Pp. 164–176. (In Rus.). doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.164-176. EDN: UKZCWW.
Supplementary files
