Feminist Hegemony in Media Culture as a Form of Gnostic Episteme
- Authors: Pozharov A.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2025)
- Pages: 47-89
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0757/article/view/366983
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EQTVVA
- ID: 366983
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of feminist hegemony in contemporary media culture through a corpus of films from the post-#MeToo period. Three clusters are investigated: utopian and dystopian narratives with a strong feminist optic, historical biopics about female figures of power, and films in which bodily and mythological otherness becomes the main resource of subjectivity. This material analyzes the shift from feminism as a struggle for representation to a regime in which the female optic defines the symbolic conditions of visibility, desires, and affect. Special attention is paid to how the female gaze, bodily vulnerability, and traumatic experience begin to structure not only the plot but also the visual-affective regimes of truth, transforming female subjectivity from a marginalized position into a demiurgic center of contemporary visual imagination. The methodological framework combines gnostic optics (nomos–pleroma–pneuma), feminist theory of subjectivity, Lacanian triangulation of desire, and visual studies, allowing the operationalization of the interception of authorship, the structuring role of the gaze, and the ritual of refusal in the analysis of corpus films. The scientific novelty of the study lies in interpreting feminist subjectivity as an expression of gnostic epistemology, rather than merely a political or legal project. The concept of "hegemony of exceptionality" is proposed, within which female otherness functions not as an object of inclusion but as a principle of normalization: it sets the filters of visibility, the distribution of affect, and regimes of permissible desires. An analytical distinction is introduced between three states of female gnosis – refusal, authorship, and bodily pleroma – and the limits of these regimes are demonstrated in cases of bodily and mythological otherness. The conclusion is drawn about the formation of a regime of "hegemony of incompleteness" in media culture, where feminist power is understood as the right to reassemble the symbolic order while preserving cracks and open otherness. This clarifies the understanding of contemporary media culture as a field of competing gnostic myths.
About the authors
Alexey Igorevich Pozharov
Email: soundman.alex@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0341-9248
References
Грамши А. Тюремные тетради. Москва: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН); 2007. 784 с. Йонас Г. Гностицизм (Гностическая религия). Санкт-Петербург: Лань; 1998. 384 с. ДеКоник Эйприл Д. Новая эра гностицизма. Как контркультурная духовность производила революцию в религии с античности до наших дней. Москва: Касталия; 2025. 354 с. Fernández Guerrero O. Mirada y poder. Una interpretación post-estructuralista del mito de Perseo. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía. 2015; 32(2): 133-147. MacNamara N. The value of owning the symbols that orientate us within Subjectivity. Feminist Theory. 2024. doi: 10.1177/14647001241280268 EDN: BEKHJP. Фуко М. Воля к истине: По ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Санкт-Петербург: Наука; 1996. 288 с. Барт Р. Смерть автора. В: Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. Москва: Прогресс; 1989. С. 384-391. Кулиану И-П. Древо гнозиса: гностическая мифология от раннего христианства до современного нигилизма. Москва: Касталия; 2019. 314 с. Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge; 1990. (Цитаты использованы в авторском переводе.) Рус. фрагм.: в: Антология гендерной теории. Минск: Пропилеи; 2000. С. 297-346. Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity; 2013. Cahana-Blum J. Wrestling with Archons: Gnosticism as a Critical Theory of Culture. Lanham: Lexington Books; 2019. 199 pp. Лакан Ж. Четыре фундаментальных понятия психоанализа. Москва: Гнозис-Логос; 2004. (семинар XI; взгляд как модальность объекта a). De Martini Melo H. The Triangulation of Desire: A Psychoanalytic Three-Part Structure of Desire and Power in Film. Communication & Methods. 2024; 6(2): 34-51. doi: 10.35951/v6i2.232 EDN: MKKJIO. Малви Л. Визуальное удовольствие и нарративное кино. В: Антология гендерной теории: сборник статей. Минск: Пропилеи; 2000. С. 280-297. Строева О. В. София Владимира Соловьёва и Матерь Мира Николая Рериха: философско-поэтическое и визуальное воплощение. Человек. 2024; 1: 70-86. doi: 10.31249/chel/2024.01.05 EDN: VEPLGL. Строева О. В. Герменевтика неомифологического образа "Медузы с головой Персея". Наука телевидения. 2023; 19(4): 13-59. doi: 10.30628/1994-9529-2023-19.4-13-59 EDN: ZUHWVA. El-Mengad Y, Chakroune IO. She's Everything, He's just Ken: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barbie (2023). Journal of Global Cultural Studies. 2025; 5(1): 1-11. doi: 10.32996/jgcs.2025.5.1.1. Adytama RW. Analisis wacana media kritis terhadap gender equality sebagai konstruksi realitas sosial melalui representasi keragaman gender dalam film Barbie (2023). Lektur: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 2024; 7(3). doi: 10.21831/lektur.v7i3.23077 EDN: HENZTW. Tallman R. The Handmaid's Tale, Feminism & the Dangers of Religion. [conference paper]. 2019. URL: https://www.academia.edu/36386514/The_Handmaids_Tale_Feminism_and_the_Dangers_of_Religion (дата обращения 28.12.2025). Güleşçe Ü. The Biopower and Biopolitics Concepts and Reflections of Them on Women in Margaret Atwood's Novel The Handmaid's Tale. Mediterranean Journal of Gender and Women's Studies. 2023; 6(2): 444-458. doi: 10.33708/ktc.1312679 EDN: PJZKKL. Hussein N. Sh, Kadhim G. A. Language and Authority: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Power Structures in The Handmaid's Tale. Journal of Language and Cultural Studies. 2025; 1(9): 237-349. De Lima O. P. Jr; Hogemann, E. R. The Handmaid’s Tale: (De)Personification as an Epistemical-Moral Dimension, Founder of the Condition of Subject of Law for Women. ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura v 2019;1(5): pp. 69-93. doi: 10.21119/anamps.51.69-93 Wood, C. "Dear You”: Witnessing Trauma in the World of The Handmaid's Tale. (2022). Honors Theses. 419 pp. Ahmed, S. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: University Press Ltd; 2014. 256 pp. Bekers K, Willems G. The Woman Writer on Film and the #MeToo Literary Biopic. Adaptation. 2022; 15(3): 332-347. doi: 10.1093/adaptation/apab020 EDN: SXSXZZ. Warner H. ‘An indie voice for a generation of women'? Greta Gerwig and gendered auteurism in post-#MeToo cinema. Feminist Media Studies. 2024; [online first]. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2023.2196605. Asardag D, Komorowski M. Finally, beyond status quo? Analysis of steps taken to improve gender equality in the European audiovisual sector in light of the #MeToo movement. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2025; 31(2): 193-211. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2024.2328554. Пожаров А.И. Гностические образы в визуальной культуре современности // Культура и искусство. 2025. № 7. С. 64-88. doi: 10.7256/2454-0625.2025.7.75333 EDN: CAOOGR URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=75333 Tan C. A Critical Analysis of Ridley Scott's Napoleon. Filmvisio. 2024; December. doi: 10.26650/Filmvisio.2024.0018. Печенкин А. А. Феномен женского в теологии гностицизма и его влияние на христианскую софиологию: религиозно-философский анализ. Диссертация ... кандидата философских наук. [Место защиты: Тул. гос. пед. ун-т им. Л.Н. Толстого]. Тула, 2011. 167 с. EDN: QFQGRJ. Predescu A. Female Authorship and the Documentary Image / Female Agency and Documentary Strategies. NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies. 2019; 8(2): 351-359. doi: 10.25969/mediarep/13133. Chen M. Redefining Female Identity Through the Female Gaze: A Comparative Analysis of Gender Narratives in Feminist Cinema. Communications in Humanities Research. 2024; 43. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/43/20240160 EDN: YLFZDY. Guo L. A Study of the Body Narrative in the Film Portrait de la Jeune Fille en Feu from a Feminist Perspective. Communications in Humanities Research. 2024; 38. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/38/20240132. Neimneh, Shadi & Al-Thebyan, Qusai. The Obstacle and the Way: Women and Gender in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2012; 2(16): 235-248. URL: https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_16_Special_Issue_August_2012/25.pdf (дата обращения 28.12.2025). Cervilla, D. N A Study of Female Agency in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. [MA Thesis]. University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real; 2016. Eden M. The Reproachful Head of the Green Knight: Exploring the eerie, liminality, deep time and duration in ‘Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.' Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance. 2022; 16(1): 55-80. doi: 10.1386/jafp_00089_1 EDN: LILUFO. Gupta G., Vijayaraghavan A. P. “Nothing in this kitchen is unplanned”: Food as performance in Mark Mylod's The Menu. AGATHOS. 2022; 15(2): 275-284. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13950052. Murray T. Studying Feminist Film Theory. Revised edition. Leighton Buzzard: Auteur Publishing; 2019. 134 p. Sorando A. N. Culpa and Rape Myths: An Adjusted Analysis of Rape Discourses and Myths. DiVA Portal. 2024.
Supplementary files
