Philosophical reconstruction of the Xieyi tradition and its aesthetic transformation in the digital media space.

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article analyzes the contemporary state of the Xieyi (写意) aesthetics in the context of the transformation of cultural practices influenced by digital media and user-generated content platforms. The subject of the study is the interaction between traditional Chinese aesthetics and new forms of visual and media aesthetic culture, manifested in the changes of artistic expression, perception, and modes of cultural consumption in the conditions of mediatisation and algorithmic logic of digital platforms. Special attention is paid to how traditional categories of Chinese aesthetics are reinterpreted and reproduced in the digital environment, acquiring new meanings, functions, and formats. The aim of the work is to identify the mechanisms of adaptation of the philosophical and artistic tradition of Xieyi to the networked cultural space, the specifics of the mediatisation of Xieyi aesthetics, and its functioning in polar modes of mass and elite culture. The methodological foundation of the research consists of interdisciplinary approaches of modern cultural philosophy, aesthetics, and media studies, as well as phenomenological and Daoist ontology of artistic experience. A comprehensive cultural analysis is combined with philosophical hermeneutics and comparative methods, allowing the aesthetics of Xieyi to be viewed as a system of meanings transitioning from traditional art to digital communication. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of the concept of "dual aesthetics of Xieyi," reflecting the dialectic of mass and elite artistic experience in the era of digitalization. A distinction is made between "everyday Xieyi," focused on emotional expression in the realm of user-generated content, and "conceptual Xieyi," which retains the philosophical depth and autonomy of art. It is shown that their interaction shapes a new ontology of art – an ontology of process, in which meaning emerges in the networked movement between the subject, media, and audience. It is concluded that contemporary Xieyi aesthetics represent a model of cultural adaptation and continuity, connecting the spiritual heritage of Chinese civilization with the philosophy of the digital age. The digital adaptation of Xieyi carries both the potential for cultural continuity and the risk of losing philosophical depth, forming a dual vector for its development in modern culture.

References

  1. Duester, E.; Zhang, R. Digital and AI Transformation in the Contemporary Art Industry in China // Arts & Communication. 2024.
  2. 刘耕 [Лю Гэн]. 作为中国特有美学概念的“写意” [Се-и как специфически китайская эстетическая концепция] // 艺术设计研究 [Art and Design Studies]. 2021. № 1. С. 104-107. DOI: CNKI:SUN:SHIZ.0.2021-01-017.
  3. Гуссерль, Э. Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. М.: Академический проект, 2011.
  4. Фуко, М. Герменевтика субъекта. СПб.: Наука, 2007. EDN: QWQSXJ.
  5. 曲雪 [Цюй Сюэ]. 新媒体时代精英文化与大众文化共生问题探究 [Исследование симбиоза элитарной и массовой культур в эпоху новых медиа] // 新闻研究导刊 [Journal of News Research]. 2018. 9(04). С. 84-86. DOI: CNKI:SUN:XWDK.0.2018-04-049.
  6. Рикёр, П. Конфликт интерпретаций. Очерки о герменевтике. М.: Academia, 2008.
  7. Бурдьё, П. Формы капитала // Экономическая социология. 2002. Т. 3, № 5. С. 60-74. EDN: OYUVRD.
  8. Kim, Y. Aesthetics of New Technological Humanities // Technology and Culture. 2023. Vol. 64(2).
  9. Беньямин, В. Произведение искусства в эпоху его технической воспроизводимости // Избранные эссе. М.: Ad Marginem Пресс, 2013. С. 23-54.
  10. Делёз, Ж.; Гваттари, Ф. Ризома // Тысяча плато: Капитализм и шизофрения. М.: Ad Marginem, 2007. С. 7-42.
  11. Киттлер, Ф. Грамматология медиа. М.: Академический проект, 2009.
  12. Маклюэн, М. Понимание медиа. М.: АСТ, 2018. 480 с.
  13. Лотман, Ю. М. Семиосфера. Культура и взрыв. СПб.: Искусство-СПБ, 2000.
  14. 彭锋 [Пэн Фэн]. 写意美学与写意艺术 [Эстетика Се-и и искусство Се-и] // 美术观察 [Fine Arts Observation]. 2024. № 12. С. 13-16. DOI: CNKI:SUN:MSGC.0.2024-12-008.
  15. Zhang, Ying. From Brush to Pixel: The Transformation of Xieyi Aesthetics in Chinese Digital Art // Journal of Visual Art Practice. 2023. Vol. 22(4). Pp. 312-328. doi: 10.1080/14702029.2023.2265471.
  16. Wang, Wenyu; Alli, H. The Significant Development of Chinese Traditional Ink Painting as a New Concept in Visual Communication Design // Online Journal of Art and Design. 2024. Vol. 12(3).
  17. Бечер, А. The Digital Illusion: Chinese New-Media Artists Exploring the Phenomenology of Space // British Journal of Chinese Studies. 2021. № 11. С. 114-134. doi: 10.51661/bjocs.v11i0.72. EDN: FUYEPO.
  18. Гройс, Б. Обновление как эстетическая категория. М.: Ad Marginem, 2015.
  19. Ассман, А. Пространства памяти. Формы и трансформации культурной памяти. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2014.
  20. Wang, Y. X. ASEAN Students' Perceptions of Contemporary Chinese Visual Culture // SAGE Open. 2025. Vol. 15(2).
  21. Ли Ч. Наследие Се-и в контексте вызовов четвертой технологической революции // Культура и искусство. 2024. № 9. С. 105-120. doi: 10.7256/2454-0625.2024.9.71445 EDN: CFNWPT URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=71445
  22. Ли Ч. Философско-методологические основания искусства Се-и: теория тройственной природы знака // Манускрипт. 2025. Том 18. Выпуск 3. С. 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.30853/mns20250165. EDN: JUPBYS
  23. Яковлева Н.Ф., Иванова Ю.В. Традиционная китайская живопись и ее роль в культуре Китая. Чита: ЗабГУ, 2015. 221 с. ISBN 978-5-9293-1347-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).