Personality traits that contribute to the non-recognition of lies
- Authors: Yanovsky M.I.1, Malishevskaya E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 72-85
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0722/article/view/372608
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2023.4.68728
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VSAGPM
- ID: 372608
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In the era of the dominance of information technology, the problem of recognizing true and false information is becoming particularly relevant. The purpose of the article is to analyze the phenomenon of lying and the factors affecting its recognition. We believe that lying is not only a distortion of information, but also a form of intersubjective relations. The deceiver creates a closed "world" for the deceived, an information cocoon that replaces reality. This creates a relationship of different levels of two subjects, the deceiver and the deceived, their inequality and the imbalance of the situation. Sensitivity to unjustified inequality of psychological positions in relationships, to disequilibrium in the situation of relationships, according to our assumption, plays an important role in the recognition of lies. The article presents the results of a study of the influence of personality traits that contribute to the non-recognition of lies. An experiment was conducted in which research participants were asked to recognize 10 true and 10 false messages. According to the results of the experiment, the subjects were divided into two equal groups: relatively poorly recognizing lies and relatively well recognizing lies. The properties characteristic of those who do not recognize lies well turned out to be: the tendency to overestimate self-attitude (to put oneself above others), pragmatism, imperiousness, combined with emotional restraint, conformity, etc. Also, those who do not recognize lies are characterized by a lower level of integration and coherence of personal structures. There is some reason to say that poor lie recognition is also promoted by the lower importance of the moral factor in the relationship.
About the authors
Mikhail Ivanovich Yanovsky
Email: m.i.yanovsky@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9265-6917
Evgeniya Vladimirovna Malishevskaya
References
Башкатов С.А., Гайнуллина С.М. Характеристика феномена лжи в отечественной и зарубежной психологии // Психология. Психофизиология. – 2020. – Т. 13, № 3. – С. 5–16. doi: 10.14529/jpps200301 Девишвили В.М., Белинский А.В., Мдивани М.О. Способность распознавать скрываемую информацию // Азимут научных исследований: Педагогика и Психология. – 2018. Т. 7. – № 3 (24). – С. 269-272. Егоров Д.М. Психологическая специфика закономерностей распознавания лжи // Вестник Томского государственного университета. – 2015. – № 393. – С. 191–195. doi: 10.17223/15617793/393/30 Королёва А.Ю. Личностные особенности людей, способных к распознаванию лжи // Ломоносовские научные чтения студентов, аспирантов и молодых учёных – 2016: сборник материалов конференций [Электронный ресурс] / Составитель Н.В. Баталова. Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова. – Архангельск: ИД САФУ, 2016. – С. 974-977. Прохорова И.Ф. Механизмы сопротивления индивида воздействию ложной информации // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. – 2017. – № 04 (58). Ч. 2. Апрель. – С. 164-166. Симоненко С.И. Психологические основания оценки ложных и правдивых сообщений. Автореф. дисс. на соиск. канд. психол. наук. – М.: МГУ им. Ломоносова, 1998. – 26 с. Экман П. Психология лжи. Обмани меня, если сможешь. – СПб.: Питер, 2021. – 384 с. Яновский М.И., Андрюшкова Н.П., Чуканов Е.В. Формирование фиксированной установки методом «25-го кадра» // Пензенский психологический вестник. – 2017. – № 1 (8). – С. 47-69. https://doi.org/10.17689/psy-2017.1.3 EDN: YUMAPN. Яновский М.И., Монастырская В.А. Факторы эффективности ориентировки в ситуации неопределенности // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Человек и мир. – 2017. – № 1. – Т. 1. – С. 219-230. EDN: YTEAN.
Supplementary files

