Fundamental theories of Conflictology: the need for practical application in the assessment of international and domestic conflicts
- Authors: Demetradze M.R.1, Shorokhova S.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 78-94
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2454-0641/article/view/367835
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KLAREP
- ID: 367835
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The globalization processes of the modern world are not at all characterized by certainty and security, because competition between states based on market principles and the struggle for world leadership in socio-economic indicators lead to international and domestic political problems. The situation is also aggravated by the fact that the previously used political techniques of imposing the image of an internal or external enemy or ethnocentrism, when some certain groups were given a negative image, and others exclusively positive, almost ceased to bring the desired results. Because, in the era of information technology that creates opportunities for multilateral information acquisition, it is almost impossible to achieve absolute manipulation of public consciousness. This was largely facilitated by the creation of classical theories by Western scientists that reveal the specifics of the behavior of the initiators (instigators) of a conflict situation and the motivations for consolidating people in accordance with a certain ideology. At the same time, practice shows that classical theories today do not bring the necessary results, and the development and proposals of new concepts that contribute to the prediction, prevention or elimination of conflicts are almost impossible today. The problem also lies in the fact that existing theories can only give a general picture of the conflict, but not control or accurately predict the outcome of the situation, which makes it difficult to ensure security and stability of modern globalization processes. In this regard, the disclosure of the specifics of classical theories and their reinterpretation in the XXI century are of fundamental importance for all societies and, above all, for the post-Soviet space, because the conflicts that have arisen here have bot
About the authors
Marine Rezoevna Demetradze
Email: demetradze1959@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7676-8054
Svetlana Petrovna Shorokhova
Email: demetradze1959@mail.ru
References
Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. 4.1. М., 1989. С. 217. Левиафан: Или Материя, форма и власть церковного и гражданского содружества, под ред. Яна Шапиро (Издательство Йельского университета, 2010. // Издательство: Азбука, 2022 г. Серия: Азбука-Классика. Non-Fictio. Подробнее: https://www.labirint.ru/books/914350/ William Graham Sumner. The Challenge of Facts and other Essays//https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/keller-the-challenge-of-facts-and-other-essays // дата обращения 27.12.22 Людвиг Гумплович (1838-1909), «Расовая борьба» (1883), «Основы социологии» (1899). Гумплович Л. Общее учение о государстве, СПб., 1910. С. 331. Зиммель Г. Конфликт современной культуры. – Прага, 1923. – С. 11-39. Козер Л. Функции социального конфликта. – M., 2000. – С. 70. Boulding К. Conflict and Defence. A General Theory. – N.V., 1962. – P.222 Некоторые социальные предпосылки демократии: экономическое развитие и политическая легитимность. The American Political Science Review, том 53, выпуск 1 (1959): 69-105. Дойч, М. (1973) Разрешение конфликта: конструктивные и деструктивные процессы. Нью-Хейвен, Коннектикут: Издательство Йельского университета. Дарендорф Р. Элементы теории социального конфликта // Социологические исследования. – 1994. – № 5. – С. 142–147. Келли Г. Две функции референтных групп // Современная зарубежная социальная психология: Тексты. – М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1984. – С. 197-204. Бандура А. Теория социального научения. – СПб.: Евразия, 2000. – 320 с. Balance Theory, Unit Relations, and Attribution : The Underlying Integrity of Heiderian Theory By: Christian S. Crandall, Paul J. Silvia, Ahogni Nicolas N'Gbala, Jo-Ann Tsang, Karen Dawson Crandall, C. S., Silvia, P. J., N'Gbala, A., Tsang, J., & Dawson, K. (2007). Balance theory, unit relations, and attribution: The underlying integrity of Heiderian theory. Review of General Psychology, 11, 12-30. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/P_Silvia_Balance_2007.pdf дата обращения 25/12/22 Хайдер Ф. «Социальная перцепция и феноменальная причинность» 1944. М. альма Пресс. C. 240.
Supplementary files
