Lean Management Strategies for Creative Organizations: Creacracy versus Bureaucracy
- Authors: Zaharov I.A.1, Logunova L.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 8 (2024)
- Pages: 1-26
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-7144/article/view/372782
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WCYZJL
- ID: 372782
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The idea to change the traditional hierarchical structure of the company is emerging as a trend in global management practices of creative industries organizations. The experience of American and Western European companies in the "creative industry" shows that a democratic decision-making process promotes the active participation of employees in the life of the company. The topic of creative management, art management, and "lean" management gets a particularly relevant sound. Today, management experience has been accumulated, thanks to which schools, hospitals, creative organizations, design bureaus have been humanized by the talent of employees, vocation and creative achievements have been supported. The subject of research was determined by the growth and demand for companies in the "creative industry" that produce creative products in the socio-cultural, scientific, artistic, and technical fields. The classification of the UK Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) identifies 44 creative professions, including architecture, IT and video games, publishing, performing arts, crafts, design, advertising, jewelry. The study applied an innovative approach to the management sociology: the experience of creacracy was studied through the prism of culture, the value component of the work of organizations, on the methodological foundation of the "turquoise" philosophy. The study of creacracy culture is based on a set of techniques: value-structural analysis, secondary analysis, document analysis, comparative analysis. Realizing the purpose of the study, the authors theoretically comprehended the experience of modern creative unions and organizations of a non–bureaucratic type based on the foundation of the culture of creative management – creacracy. The authors defined this form of management as the management of organizations, an alternative to bureaucracy, corresponding to a culture based on the values of human-centricity, freedom, creativity, transparency, implemented on the principles of lean or understanding management in the practices of "happy" ("joyful") management of creative projects. A group of types of creacratic management has been formed: adhocratic, chaordic, halordic. With differences in the choice of management tactics, these types are united by the design of management strategies – delegation of authority, coordination, support, orientation towards self-government. This shows the human-centricity of creacratic management. A comparative analysis of bureaucratic and creacratic forms showed differences in values, setting and understanding goals, choosing leading managerial functions, management strategies and practices, and types of employees. The analytics presented in the research results are of practical importance for the heads of creative industries organizations choosing management strategies.
About the authors
Iurii Alekseevich Zaharov
Email: rurkorur@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-9722-0265
Larisa Yur'evna Logunova
Email: vinsky888@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8417-913X
References
Вебер М. Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии в 4-х т.; пер. В. А. Браун-Цеховой. Т. 1. М. ВШЭ, 2016. 444 с. Гоулднер А. Наступающий кризис западной социологии; пер. с англ. СПб.: Наука. 2003. 575 с. Джекобс Дж. Смерть и жизнь больших американских городов. М: Новое издательство, 2015. 512 с. Инглхарт Р. Постмодерн: Меняющиеся ценности и изменяющиеся общества // Полис 1997. № 4. С. 6-97. Евневич М. А. Особенности управления персоналом в интеллектуальных и творческих организациях. URL: http://www.kaus–group.ru/knowledge/300–articles/material/207 (дата обращения: 19.02.2023). Лалу Ф. Открывая организации будущего; пер. с англ. В. Кулябиной. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016. 432 с. Лэндри Ч. Креативный город; пер. с англ. В. Гнедовского, М. Хрусталевой. М.: Классика-XXI, 2011 – 399 с. Паркинсон С. Н. Законы Паркинсона; пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1989. 448 с. Сэмлер Р. Маверик. История успеха самой необычной компании в мире. Пер. с англ. Н. Быстрозорова. М.: Добрая книга, 2007. 384 с. Тоффлер Э. Шок будущего; пер. с англ. Под ред. П. С. Гуревича. М.: АСТ, 2002. 557 с. Тоффлер Э. Третья волна. Пер. с англ. К. Ю. Бурмистрова. М.: АСТ. 2009. 795 с. Уайт У. Х. Организационный человек; пер. с англ. В. Г. Николаева // Личность, Культура. Общество, 2002, T. IV. Вып. 3-4 (13-14). С. 281-302. Уайт У. Х. Организационный человек; пер. с англ. В. Г. Николаева // Личность, Культура. Общество, 2002, T. IV. Вып. 3-4 (17-18). С. 258-269. Уайт У. Х. Организационный человек; пер. с англ. В. Г. Николаева // Личность, Культура. Общество, 2002, T. IV. Вып. 3-4 (17-18). С. 63-79. Флорида Р. Креативный класс: люди, которые меняют будущее; пер. с англ. А. Константинова. – М.: Издательский дом «Классика-ХХI», 2007. 421 с. Хок Ди. Философия твоей кредитки. История Visa; пер. с англ. С. Кармашовой. М.: Секрет фирмы, 2006. 336 с. Шеридан Р. Работа мечты. Как построить компанию, которую любят; пер. с англ. Е. Ивченко. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер. 2014. 314 с. Bennis W. G. American Bureaucracy. Chicago: Aldine Published Company, 1970. 187 p. Coy P. The Creative Economy. Which Companies Will Thrive in the Coming Years? Those That Value Ideas above All Else // Bloomberg Business Week. 2000. August 28. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2000-08-27/the-creative-economy (дата обращения 19.02.2023). Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books, 2002. 430 p. Guilford J. P. Creativity // Аmerican Psychologist. 1950. № 15. С. 444-454. Hock Dее. Birth of the Chaordic Age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1999. P. 67. Howkins J. Creative Economy: How People Make money from Ideas. L.: Penguin, 2002. 288 p. Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution in Europe // American Political Science Review", 1971. № 4. P. 991-1017. Jones L., Thompson F. Public Management Institutional Renewal for Twenty-First Century. Stanford: JAI Press, 1999. P. 24-26. Lloyd R. D. Neo-bohemia: art and commerce in the postindustrial city. N.-Y: Routledge, 2005. 295 p. Pfeifer J. The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. 374 p. Schultz T. W. The Economic Value of Education. London, New York: Colambia University Press, 1963. 92 p. Wilshire B. The Moral Collapse of the University. Professionalism, Purity, and Alienation. NY: State University of New York Press, 1990. 287 p. Whyte W. H., Jr. The Organization Man. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1957. 471 с.
Supplementary files

