Criteria and factors of digital activism effectiveness: expert assessments
- Authors: Abramova S.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2023)
- Pages: 63-77
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2409-7144/article/view/372708
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GAGFRR
- ID: 372708
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article examines the problem of the effectiveness of digital participation, and sets the goal of defining criteria for measuring it and identifying factors that act as barriers to the implementation and achievement of full results of digital civic initiatives. The diversity of understanding efficiency is revealed in the context of the specifics of social processes and digital communications. It is shown that in the Russian and foreign scientific sociological field has not been formed a wide and substantiated experience and methodology for studying the effectiveness of online forms of civic activism, which determines the relevance of the research topic, as well as the need for a methodological solution to the problem. The empirical basis of the study is a survey of 16 experts in the field of digital activism from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation conducted. The novelty of the work is related to the typology of the criteria for the effectiveness of digital participation, based on the analysis of expert assessments: effectiveness as effectiveness, effectiveness as the level of activity and involvement of citizens, effectiveness as development (creativity and innovation), social effectiveness and social effects, effectiveness as dialogue and the development of social partnership. Within each type there is a detailed description of the indicators and quotes from experts characterizing this performance indicator. It has been recorded that experts perceive the situation with the development of digital civic participation as dual, in which positive trends collide with barrier factors and conditions. Key factors-barriers have been identified: negative ideas about the effectiveness of digital activism, low awareness of the population about digital technologies and opportunities for participation, formalization and simulation of citizen activity, etc. Taking into account the results obtained, the prospects for future research are related to the study of the social effects of digital activism, identifying criteria for effectiveness in the assessments of the initiators and participants of activism, government officials and the media.
About the authors
Sofya Borisovna Abramova
Email: sofia_abramova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4010-8406
References
Абрамова С. Б., Антонова Н. Л. Эффективность цифровой партисипации молодежи как формы гражданской активности (пилотное исследование в Екатеринбурге) // Мир науки. Социология, филология, культурология. 2022. Т. 13, № 3. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/12SCSK322.pdf (дата обращения: 18.11.2023). Ермолаева П., Башева О., Ермолаева Ю. «Между виртуальным и физическим»: контуры цифрового активизма экологических некоммерческих организаций России // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2023. Т. 21, № 2. С. 241–258. doi: 10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-2-241-258. Кузнецова С. В. Проблемы оценки социальных результатов и эффектов деятельности социальных предприятий // Московский экономический журнал. 2021. №3. С. 572-585. doi: 10.24412/2413-046Х-2021-10185. Невская Т. А. Гражданский активизм как ресурс политического администрирования медиапространства: российский и международный опыт // Социодинамика. 2020. № 9. С.18–29. doi: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.9.33869. Нятина Н. В., Григорик Н. Н., Молчанов А. А. Цифровизация социально-политического взаимодействия: мобилизация реальной и виртуальной коммуникации. Виртуальная коммуникация и социальные сети. 2023. Т. 2. № 3. С. 167–174. doi: 10.21603/2782-4799-2023-2-3-167-174. Рождественская Н. В., Богуславская С. Б., Боброва О. С. Оценка эффективности проектов некоммерческих организаций, социального предпринимательства и гражданских инициатив. СПб.: Издательство Политехнического университета, 2016. 168 с. Терзиев В. Социальное развитие и изучение социальной эффективности // SSRN, 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4368531. Шувалова Ю. А. Качественные характеристики в оценке эффективности социальных процессов организации // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. 2016. Том 6, № 4. С. 419–428. doi: 10.18334/epp.6.4.36874. Cebul M., Pinckney J. Digital Authoritarianism and Nonviolent Action: Challenging the Digital Counterrevolution // "em"United States Institute of Peace. Special Report"/em". 2021. № 499. URL: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/sr_499-digital_authoritarianism_and_nonviolent_action_challenging_the_digital_counterrevolution.pdf (дата обращения: 17.11.2023). Cooper K. The Effectiveness of Online Activism: Who It Is Effective for, What Issues It Is Effective for, and What Time Period It Is Effective for // "em"Political Science"/em". 2023. № 42. URL: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=honorscollege_pos (дата обращения: 19.11.2023). Herawati A. R., Marom A., Widowati N. Digital Activism. A New Way of Social Movement in the Digitalization Era // Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022). 2023. P. 458–470. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_44. Kligler-Vilenchik N., Literat I. Youth Digital Participation: Now More than Ever // Media and Communication. 2020. Vol. 8, № 2. doi: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.3180. Leighton D., Wood C. Measuring social value: the gap between policy and practice. London: Demos, 2010. URL: https://www.a-n.co.uk/research/measuring-social-value-gap-policy-practice/ (дата обращения: 17.11.2023). Mata N. Slacktivism: Are We Falling for It? // JOUR 335: Journalism Research Methods. 2020. URL: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/608f4796ca0ecb13d35de53f/t/60934a7b9c45170ddca887e4/1620265596048/Slacktivism.pdf (дата обращения: 18.11.2023). Pantić M., Colic N. Digital participation framework for mountain areas in Serbia // Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. 2023. № 19(68E). P. 78–95. doi: 10.24193/tras.68E.5. Shi B. Success of Digital Activism: Roles of Structures and Media Strategies // Silicon Valley Notebook. 2016. Vol. 14, Article 6. URL: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=svn (дата обращения: 18.11.2023). Wilson A., Tewdwr-Jones M. Digital Participatory Planning. Citizen Engagement, Democracy, and Design. New York: Routledge, 2021. 310 p.
Supplementary files

