Evolution of treatment approaches for cesarean scar pregnancy
- Authors: Suslikova D.V.1, Shmakov R.G.1, Barinova I.V.1,2, Shakhina M.Y.1, Batenkova T.A.1, Fedorov A.A.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
- Issue: Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 451-461
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2313-8726/article/view/376624
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog692922
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IJJTGK
- ID: 376624
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar pregnancy is a relevant problem in modern obstetrics and gynecology. This condition may lead to life-threatening complications requiring urgent medical intervention. Hysteroscopic resection using the cold loop technique in combination with vacuum aspiration of the gestational sac is an effective and safe surgical method for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate treatment approaches for cesarean scar pregnancy and to determine optimal surgical strategies, as well as to analyze morphological findings in surgical specimens obtained from patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.
METHODS: The study was conducted at the Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky. Between 2016 and 2025, surgical treatment was performed in 41 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. Management strategies used in 2016–2019 were compared with those applied over the subsequent 5 years. Clinical characteristics, preoperative ultrasound findings, and surgical treatment methods were analyzed (including laparotomic metroplasty, vacuum aspiration of the gestational sac, hysteroscopic resection using a cold loop, and hysterectomy).
RESULTS: More than half of the examined women had a history of more than two cesarean deliveries performed with cervical dilation greater than 5 cm. Ultrasound examination demonstrated localization of the gestational sac within the scar area in all patients (COS-1 sign). Signs of chorionic invasion were identified in 22.7% of cases. Both organ-preserving and radical treatment approaches were applied. Over the past five years, a trend toward increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques has been observed at the institute, resulting in reduced duration of hospitalization and postoperative rehabilitation. The complex of morphological features identified within scar niches containing ectopic pregnancies was characteristic of placenta accreta spectrum disorders (placenta creta); however, given the early gestational age and absence of a fully formed placenta, this condition may be referred to as chorionic invasion.
CONCLUSION: Cesarean scar pregnancy is a rare but extremely dangerous complication that may result in uterine rupture, massive hemorrhage, and maternal mortality. Minimally invasive organ-preserving techniques—vacuum aspiration and hysteroscopic resection using the cold loop technique—represent the optimal treatment strategy. In cases of pronounced destructive changes of the uterine wall, metroplasty is justified.
Keywords
About the authors
Daria V. Suslikova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Author for correspondence.
Email: fferyllydd73@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2906-7546
Russian Federation, Moscow
Roman G. Shmakov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: r_shmakov@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2206-1002
SPIN-code: 3804-3269
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina V. Barinova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: barinova.irina.vladimirovna@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0447-1734
SPIN-code: 6145-0926
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMarina Yu. Shakhina
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: shahinamarina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4599-4446
SPIN-code: 5859-5973
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowTatyana A. Batenkova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: t.batenkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-2872-8973
Russian Federation, Moscow
Anton A. Fedorov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Email: aa.fedorov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2590-5087
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Silva B, Viana Pinto P, Costa MA. Cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;288:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030
- Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):169–175. doi: 10.1002/uog.17568
- Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus — an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1978;53(4):142–143.
- Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(3):247–253. doi: 10.1002/uog.974
- Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220–227. doi: 10.1002/uog.56
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM); Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #63: cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(3):B9–В20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024
- Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gică N, et al. Diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accreta spectrum: case series and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(9):1975–1986. doi: 10.1002/jum.15574
- Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(6):915–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.019
- Giampaolino P, De Rosa N, Morra I, et al. Management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a single-institution retrospective review. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6486407. doi: 10.1155/2018/6486407
- Kutlesic R, Kutlesic M, Vukomanovic P, et al. cesarean scar pregnancy successfully managed to term: when the patient is determined to keep the pregnancy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(10):496. sdoi: 10.3390/medicina56100496
- Alameddine S, Lucidi A, Jurkovic D, et al. Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2327569. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2327569
- Hussein AM, Elbarmelgy RA, Elbarmelgy RM, et al. Prospective evaluation of impact of post-Cesarean section uterine scarring in perinatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorder. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(4):474–482. doi: 10.1002/uog.23732
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(3):346–53. doi: 10.1002/uog.13426
- Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(2):398–400. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81930-9
- Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(6):515–523. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh042
- Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(3):253–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x
- Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta. 2008;29(7): 639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.04.008
- Jauniaux E, Mavrelos D, De Braud LV, et al. Impact of location on placentation in live tubal and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Placenta. 2021;108:109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.03.019
- Fu L, Luo Y, Huang J. Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48(7):1683–1690. doi: 10.1111/jog.15258
- ESHRE working group on Ectopic Pregnancy; Kirk E, Ankum P, Jakab A, et al. Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(4):hoaa055. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa055
- Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373–1381. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce
- Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.020
- Gus AI, Yarygina TA, Mikheeva AA, et al. Standardized examination of postoperative uterine scar. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;(1):42–47. doi: 10.18565/aig.2022.1.42-47 EDN: YWXUZT
- Cali G, Forlani F, Timor-Tritsch IE, et al. Natural history of cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(1):100–104. doi: 10.1002/uog.16216
- D’Antonio F, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Lim PS, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: evidence-based answers to clinical questions on morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):290–301. doi: 10.1002/uog.14950
- Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, D’Antonio F, Buca D, et al. Systematic review on near miss cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: correlation with invasion topography, prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(19):3377–3384. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1570494
- Clinical recommendations: Ectopic pregnancy. 2021–2022–2023 (01.07.2021). Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 36 р.
- Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy (Green-top Guideline No. 21). RCOG/AEPU Joint Guideline. November 2016: 41.
- Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):638–644. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.013
- Muraji M, Mabuchi S, Hisamoto K, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies successfully treated with methotrexate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(6):720–723. doi: 10.1080/00016340902883141
- Fadhlaoui A, Khrouf M, Khémiri K, et al. Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with systemically administered methotrexate and subsequent dilatation and curettage: a case report. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:248564. doi: 10.1155/2012/248564
- Buyanova SN, Shchukina NA, Chechneva MA, et al. Pregnancy in a cesarean section scar: possibilities of surgical correction. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2020;20(6):65–70. doi: 10.17116/rosakush20202006165 EDN: ZCHGUF
Supplementary files

