Digitalization as an instrument for improving the efficiency of governmental regulation of rural tourism
- Authors: Ilyasova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban State University
- Issue: Vol 12, No 4 (2025): RUSSIAN TRANSFORMATION: POLITICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS
- Pages: 477-487
- Section: Russian Transformation: Political and Socio-Economic Aspects
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2312-8313/article/view/365370
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2025-12-4-477-487
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MEKFWS
- ID: 365370
Cite item
Abstract
The digital transformation of public administration serves as a pivotal instrument for overcoming systemic dysfunctions in regulating complex cross-sectoral areas, including rural tourism. An empirical analysis based on data from the Russian Federation Accounts Chamber, the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia (FAS Russia), and the All-Russian People’s Front identified persistent institutional barriers: duplication of functions, regulatory fragmentation, and poor interagency coordination. These issues result in project approval timelines extending to 120-135 days and high transaction costs for businesses. The study aims to develop and verify a model of a digital platform designed to optimize interagency interaction and administrative processes within the existing regulatory framework. The methodology includes the calculation of a composite digitalization index (CDI) based on an adapted methodology from the OECD and the Russian Ministry of Digital Development, correlation analysis of data from the Russian Ministry of Agriculture and the Russian Ministry of Finance (2021-2025), content analysis of 75 regulatory acts, and expert interviews with government officials (n = 15). The results demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the level of digitalization and the growth of tourist inflow (r = 0.72; p < 0.01), as well as the efficiency of budget fund utilization (up to 92% in regions with a high CDI compared to 65% in regions with a low CDI). It is established that increased funding for support programs does not compensate for institutional constraints; the key efficiency factors are data harmonization, end-to-end procedures, and system interoperability. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of the synchronous implementation of three components: legislative unification, the creation of a digital ecosystem, and training for civil servants, which is supported by successful EU practices. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the quantitative substantiation of a causal relationship between digitalization and the overcoming of institutional, rather than technological, barriers, as well as in the development of a platform architecture that integrates disparate data and procedures. The practical significance is reflected in specific measures to reduce the administrative burden and increase the transparency of state regulation.
About the authors
Elena V. Ilyasova
Kuban State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: lenailyasova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7403-5511
SPIN-code: 1597-4459
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Management
149 Stavropolskaya st., Krasnodar, 350040, Russian FederationReferences
- Gil-Garcia JR, Dawes SS, Pardo TA. Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Management Review. 2018;22(5):633-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
- Smorgunov LV. Digitalization and network effectiveness of public governability. Political Science (RU). 2021;(3):13-36. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.03.01 EDN: KHMUCH
- Twizeyimana JD, Andersson A. The public value of E-Government - a literature review. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(2):167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
- Isakova GK. Modern trends in digital transformation of state and municipal administration in the Russian Federation. Journal of Applied Research. 2025;(6):125-132. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1878.2025.6.6.016 EDN: YSQIAA
- Klievink B, Janssen M, Tan YH. A maturity model for digital connectivity and interoperability in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(4):101605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_7
- Janowski T. Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly. 2015;32(3):221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001 EDN: XYSDMJ
- Mergel I, Edelmann N, Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(4):101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
- Dawes SS, Vidiasova L, Parkhimovich O. Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly. 2016;33(1):15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003 EDN: WTYMLL
- Hall P, Müller S, Schmidt E. Implementing integrated digital platforms in public sector: lessons from Germany and France. Government Information Quarterly. 2022;39(2):101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101678 EDN: DGYEPR
- Tereshchenko LK, Starodubova OE, Nazarov NA. Digital platforms as a new interaction environment: review of the scientific and practical seminar and results of the expert survey. Journal of Russian Law. 2024;28(7):161-171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.61205/S160565900030930-7 EDN: OWLNHC
- Ansell C, Miura S. Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration Review. 2020;80(4):654-663. https://doi.org//10.1111/puar.13203
- Cordella A, Tempini N. E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly. 2015;32(3):279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
- Yang TM, Zheng L, Pardo TA. The boundaries of information sharing and integration: a case study of Taiwan e-government. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(1):185-196. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930321.1930350
- Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Geyer C. Artificial Intelligence and the public sector - applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration. 2018;42(7):596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
- Shirochenko DV. Digital transformation in state strategic planning. International Research Journal. 2024;(3). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2024.141.48 EDN: LMPZKH
- Dmitrieva NE, Minchenko OS, Rylskikh EV. Digital platforms as a regulator and the regulated subject, or how platforms change the system of public administration. Public Administration Issues. 2022;(2):60-84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-60-84 EDN: CTFLTJ
Supplementary files


