Leadership and Collaborative Governance in transition era from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Mapping Study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Leadership is an important factor in building collaborative governance, even leadership capacity would also affect the effectiveness of ongoing collaborations. This study aims to describe the map of leadership and collaborative governance studies through a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) over a period of 5 years. This period was chosen in connection with the transition period from Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs.) The literature studies that were conducted cover the years of 2013 to 2018. The results showed that research on leadership and collaborative governance varied greatly and it was necessary to do a mapping to see the trends. The most widely used research method is qualitative, and the trend of publication shows a very significant decline, especially in 2013-2018. Based on these results, research on leadership with a focus on collaborative governance research is important to be carried out in order to produce various innovations and scientific development (body of knowledge).

About the authors

Muh A. Muslim

Universitas Indonesia

Email: muhazismuslim01@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8768-9100

PhD, Lecturer of the Department of Public Administration

16424, Depok, West Java and Salemba, Jakarta, Indonesia

Eko Prasojo

Universitas Indonesia

Email: e_prasojo@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3904-0814

Professor, Lecturer of the Department of Public Administration

16424, Depok, West Java and Salemba, Jakarta, Indonesia

Roy V. Salomo

Universitas Indonesia

Author for correspondence.
Email: roy.v09@ui.ac.id
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2501-7629

PhD, Lecturer of the Department of Public Administration

16424, Depok, West Java and Salemba, Jakarta, Indonesia

References

  1. Ansell C., Alison G. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;8:543-71.
  2. Emerson K., Tina N., Stephen B. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Administration Research and Theory. 2012;22(1):1-29.
  3. Sullivan H., Dan S.C. Working Across Boundaries; Collaboration in Public Services. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002.
  4. Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization (revised edition). New York: Double D; 2007.
  5. Boon S.N., Geraldine C. Dynamic Governance, Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd; 2007.
  6. Ricard L.M, Erik H.K., Jenny M.L., Tamyko Y. Assessing Public Leadership Styles for Innovation: A Comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review. 2017;19(2):134-156.
  7. Ogbonna E., Lloyd C.H. Leadership Style. Organizational Culture and Performance: Empirical Evidence from UK Companies. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2000;11(4):766-788.
  8. Robbins S.P. Essentials of Organizational Behavior (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc; 1988.
  9. Peters B.G. Meta-Governance and Public Management. Dalam: Osborne, Stephen P. (Ed.). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on Theory and Practice of Public Governance. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  10. Bertocci D.I. Leadership in Organizations: There Is a Difference between Leaders and Managers. Lanham: University Press of America, Inc; 2009.
  11. Kartono K. Leader and Leadership, What Is the Abnormal Leader. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada; 2009.
  12. Yukl G. Leadership in Organization. Translated by: Sampe Maselinus, Rita Tondok Andarika. Second Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 2009.
  13. Covey S.R. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Tangerang: Binarupa Aksara Publisher; 2011.
  14. Stephen P. Integrative Leadership for Collaborative Governance: Civic Engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly. 2010;21(2):246-263.
  15. Heather G., Ricardo S.M. Collaborative Leadership Development for Local Government Officials: Exploring Competencies and Program Impact. Public Administration Quarterly. 2013;37(1):7-102.
  16. Purdy J.M. A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes. Public Administration Review. 2012;72:409-417.
  17. Emerson K., Tina N. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2015.
  18. McDougall C., et.al. Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal’s Community Forests. Society & Natural Resources. 2013;26(11):1235-1251.
  19. Wellbrock W. Operational Interfaces. A Key to More Collaborative Modes of Governance. Wageningen: Wageningen University; 2013.
  20. Kitchenham B.A., Dyba T., Jorgensen M. Evidence-based Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society. 2004; 1: 273-281.
  21. Kitchenham B., Charters S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University; 2007.
  22. Petersen K., et al. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering; 2008.
  23. Banaeianjahromi N., Smolander K. What do We Know about the Role of Enterprise Architecture in Enterprise Integration? A Systematic Mapping Study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2016;29(1):140-164.
  24. Purbasari R., Wijaya C., Rahayu N. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem as A Network-Rich System: A Systematic Mapping Study. Academy Of Entrepreneurship Journal; Arden. 2019;25(2):1-17.
  25. Muslim M.A., Prasojo E., Jannah L.M. Collaborative Governance for Poverty Alleviation: A Systematic Mapping Study. RUDN Journal of Public Administration. 2021;8(1):20-36.
  26. Musianto L. The Difference Between the Quantitative Approach and Qualitative Approach in The Research Method. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan. 2002;4(2):123-126.
  27. Wieringa R., Maiden N., Mead N., Rolland C. Requirements Engineering Paper Classification and Evaluation Criteria: A Proposal and a Discussion. Requirements Engineering. 2006;11(1):102-107.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).