Email this article Administrative Traditions of China and Indonesia
- Authors: Anwar A.1, Rosidah R.1, Pramazuly A.N.1, Setiawan R.2, Mladenov S.V.3
-
Affiliations:
- Tulang Bawang University
- Sakarya University
- Kazan Federal University
- Issue: Vol 10, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 418-433
- Section: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2312-8313/article/view/317978
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2023-10-3-418-433
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XSTNAF
- ID: 317978
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Each country has a different administrative tradition, such as those found in China and Indonesia. The two countries are close to each other and have good relations to date. Chinese Confucian teachings that are still preserved today have brought this country to change. The method used in this study is a qualitative research method using a document or literature analysis approach. The use of this method aims to obtain material and empirical data obtained through journals and scientific papers, reports, books, and other documents related to the research being conducted. The results of the study explain that the evolution of administration in China occurred from generation to generation, giving the characteristics of each dynasty. Similar to China, in Indonesia, the people also adhere to Pancasila values and include these values in the administration of government in Indonesia. The Indonesian nation upholds ethnic differences and tolerance of religious differences. However, national values still refer to Pancasila ideology and do not use Confucian teachings in administering government in Indonesia.
About the authors
Anwar Anwar
Tulang Bawang University
Email: anwar.siip71@gmail.com
Lecturer in the Department of Public Administration 34, Gajah Mada Street, Kota Baru, Lampung, Indonesia, 35128
Rosidah Rosidah
Tulang Bawang University
Email: idahros40@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4406-9574
Lecturer in the Department of Public Administration
34, Gajah Mada Street, Kota Baru, Lampung, Indonesia, 35128Ayu N. Pramazuly
Tulang Bawang University
Email: ayunadiapramazuly@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-9727-1104
Lecturer in the Department of Public Administration
34, Gajah Mada Street, Kota Baru, Lampung, Indonesia, 35128Refly Setiawan
Sakarya University
Author for correspondence.
Email: refly.setiawan@ogr.sakarya.edu.tr
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0719-1287
PhD Student in the Department of Political Science and Public Administration
Kemalpaşa, Esentepe Campus, University Cd., Serdivan, Sakarya, Türkiye, 54050Stanislav V. Mladenov
Kazan Federal University
Email: stanislav.mladenov@yandex.ru
PhD Student in the Department of International Relations 18, Kremlyovskaya St, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420008
References
- Adam E., Roy L.H. Administering Public Participation. Sage Journals. 2019;50(2):133-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
- Asruchin M. Konfusianisme: Sumber Peradaban Cina. The First International Seminar & Roundtable Meeting “Professional Chinese Teaching” In Southeast Asia. Jakarta: University of Al Azhar Indonesia; 2018:75 (In Indon.).
- Robbins S.P. Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Aplication (Alih bahasa: Jusuf Udaya). Jakarta: Arcan; 2015.
- Gitaningrum I. Pengaruh Prinsip Konfusianisme Terhadap Politik Luar Negeri Tiongkok dalam Menghadapi Gagasan Universalitas HAM Barat. Journal of International Relations. 2018;2(2):51-67 (In Indon.).
- Endah H., Wulandari, Israhadi S. Konfusianisme dan Ideologi Jepang Tentang Propaganda: Slogan dalam Naskah Drama Majalah Keboedajaan Timoer 1943. Jurnal Kajian Jepang. 2019;3(1):1-23 (In Indon.).
- Muas R. Konfusianisme Sebagai Sabuk Pengaman RRT. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Universitas Indonesia. 2020;10(2):206-224 (In Indon.).
- Rozie F. Negeri Sejahtera Ala Konfusianisme Melalui Self Cultivation. Kalam Journal. 2012;6(1):177-195 (In Indon.).
- Painter M., Peters G.B. Tradition and Public Administration. UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
- Rosidi A. Aktualisasi Ajaran Konfusianisme Dalam Membangun Nasionalisme Etnis Tionghoa (Perspektif Etnis Tionghoa Surakarta). Jurnal SMART (Studi MAsyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi). 2015;1(2):165-175 (In Indon.).
- Dwiyanto A. Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Publik Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2017 (In Indon.).
- Haning M.T. Reformasi Birokrasi: Desain Organisasi yang Mendukung Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ilmu Giri; 2015 (In Indon.).
- Yusriadi A.H., Ihsan A. Bureaucratic Reform in Public Service: A Case Study on the One Stop-Integrated Service. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;8:253-258. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n2p253
- Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. N.Y.: Plume Publisher; 1992.
- Creswell J.W. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar; 2010 (In Indon.).
- Moleong L. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya; 2013 (In Indon.).
- Farida I., Setiawan R., Maryatmi A.S., Juwita M.N. The Implementation of E-Government in The Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies. 2020;22(2):340-346.
- Thoha M. Birokrasi Pemerintah Indonesia di Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2011 (In Indon.).
- Syafiie I.K. Sistem Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2011 (In Indon.).
- Viky A.H., Tistry R.P., Deva P., Nandy J., Lidya T.A. Pramudita. Menggagas Revolusi Mental Birokrasi Melalui Konsep Competitive Agile Leadership. Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah. 2020;2(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v2i1.8050 (In Indon.).
- Setiawan R. Partisipasi Publik Dalam Program Bantuan Listrik Pedesaan Masyarakat Kabupaten Mesuji. Jurnal e-JKPP. 2017;3(3):82-92 (In Indon.).
- Wibawa S. Administrasi Negara Isu-isu Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2016 (In Indon.).
Supplementary files
