Interactive model of the China-US-Russia triangle relationship: Theoretical analysis and development prospect


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study examines the interactions within the China-US-Russia triangle using the two types of strategic triangle theory. By analyzing Dittmer’s four models - family triangle, romantic triangle, stable marriage, and unit veto - it explores the evolving dynamics between these three countries. Currently, the relationship between China, the US, and Russia most closely resembles a stable marriage, where China and Russia cooperate against the United States. As a global power, the United States attempts to contain China and Russia through two lines, especially through economic, military and diplomatic means to suppress China’s rise, while countering Russia’s geopolitical threats. China and Russia have gradually approached under the pressure of the United States and formed a stable strategic cooperative relationship, especially in the fields of energy, military and diplomacy with a focus on handling Western sanctions and pressures. Drawing on Martin White’s dynamic triangle model, the study also explains the semi-final type of the triangle relationship and suggests various future possibilities for the relationship between the three nations.

About the authors

Nikolay N. Yagodka

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: yagodka-nn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2354-3115

PhD in Political Science, Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Administration

6 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Ying Wang

Shandong University

Email: 415553772@qq.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-1240-5414

PhD student of Institute of Political Science and Public Administration

72 Binhai road, Jimo district, Qingdao, 266237, China

References

  1. Caplow T. A Theory of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review. 1956;21(4):489-493.
  2. Dittmer L. The strategic triangle: An elementary game-­theoretical analysis. World Politics. 1981;33(4):485-489.
  3. Wu YS. Exploring dual triangles: The development of Taipei-­Washington relations. Issues & Studies. 1996;32(10):26-52.
  4. Womack B. Asymmetry and International Relations. Shanghai People’s Publishing House; 2019. 245 p.
  5. Wight M. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 1977. 232 p.
  6. Zhengliang Y, Xiaoyi L. New situation of strategic relations between China, the United States, and Russia. World Economic and Political Forum. 2015;(6):1-23.
  7. Trenin D. Politics and circumstances. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-­and-comments/comments/politika-i-­obstoyatelstva/?sphrase_id=93928608 (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  8. Pirozhenko V. Washington’s capabilities no longer match its strategic ambition. URL: https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2022/04/21/vozmozhnosti-­vashingtona-bolshe-­ne-sootvetstvujut-­ego-strategicheskomu-­zamahu-56016.html?ysclid=l9qe26p3g4903624006 (accessed 25.09.2024).
  9. Stent A. Russia and China: Axis of revisionists? URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-­content/uploads/2020/02/FP_202002_russia_china_stent.pdf (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  10. Allison G. China and Russia: A strategic alliance in the making. URL: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-­and-russia-­strategic-alliance-­making-38727 (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  11. Brzezinski Z. How to Address Strategic Insecurity in a Turbulent Age. URL: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/us-­china-russia-­relations_us_586955dbe4b0de3a08f8e3e0?section=us_world (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  12. Mercy AK. China’s Ukraine response is all about the US (Not Russia). URL: https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/chinas-­ukraine-response-­is-all-­about-the-­us-not-­russia/ (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  13. Heath TR, Gunness K, Finazzo T. Scenarios of systemic conflict between the United States and China. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA830-1.html. (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  14. Carafa JJ. America and Russia are in a New Kind of War. Monitor Strategic. 2022. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=1086471. (accessed 25.09.2024).
  15. Hongye B. “Strategic triangle” or “Trilateral interaction”: China-US-Russia Relations in the New Era. International Observation. 2022;(3):127-156.
  16. Larin VL. New turbulence in the geopolitical triangle USA - China - Russia. URL: https://www.dv.kp.ru/daily/217179/4283248/ (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  17. Hoang LT, Nguyen H. The modern China-­Russia-US triangle: Why we can’t expect a stable two-­against-one dynamic this time. URL: https://translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/en-­ru.ru.305d28e4-6450bd7c-6902f78e-74722d776562/https/thediplomat.com/2021/06/the-­modern-china-­russia-us-­triangle/ (accessed: 25.09.2024).
  18. Huasheng Z. On the new triangle relationship between China, Russia and the United States. Journal of Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies. 2018;(6):1-25.
  19. Aptekar’ P. American-­Chinese confrontation: risks and opportunities for Russia. URL: https://daily.hse.ru/post/705 (accessed: 25.09.2024) (In Russ.).
  20. Ford S. The new cold war with China and Russia: Same as the Old Cold War? URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=20&q=allintitle:+China+Russia&hl=zh-C (accessed: 25.09.2024).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).