Free medical services in Russia as a merit good
- Authors: Larionova N.I.1, Manukyants S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Volga State University of Technology
- Issue: No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 6-17
- Section: ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2306-2800/article/view/296449
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25686/2306-2800.2023.4.6
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XWMAGN
- ID: 296449
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. The problem of improving the quality of health capital creates motivation for a more detailed study of the theoretical justification for the emergence of merit goods and correlation of their current interpretation with the key features of modern Russian healthcare.
The purpose of the research work is to substantiate the methodological approach to the study of medical services provided to Russian citizens within the framework of free medical care as a merit good. To reach this aim, the following research objectives have been achieved: the content and fundamental characteristics of the concepts “merit good” and “merit need” have been analyzed; the relationship of these concepts with key concepts of modern economics describing individual and collective choice has been explored; the existing institutional structure of providing free medical care to Russian citizens is correlated with the concepts of merit needs and goods.
Research methods include the analysis of relevant domestic and foreign scientific publications, the Russian legislative framework, synthesis, as well as analytic and graphic modeling.
Results. The concept of merit goods proposed by R. Musgrave came into conflict with one of the key provisions of the economic mainstream – methodological individualism. Attempts to eliminate this contradiction gave rise to a scientific debate, which over time influenced ideas about the independence of individuals' preferences and created the need to partially rethink the nature and role of the public sector of the economy, complementing the toolkit of supporters of state paternalism. Public choice in the case of merit goods represents (aggregates) individual political preferences. These policy preferences, in turn, can be seen as higher-order preferences that override the individual preferences that are revealed by market mechanisms. The healthcare for Russian citizens, to the extent that it is guaranteed by the state, is an example of such preferences. The list of free medical services (merit benefits) included in it is fixed in each subject of the Russian Federation by a program of state guarantees for the provision of free medical care to citizens, however, the actual content of such programs depends to a greater extent on the financial security of the subject than on the real merit needs.
Conclusion. The volume and range of merit goods are determined by normative procedures for making collective decisions. In the case of the Russian healthcare system, they are recorded in the program of state guarantees for the provision of free medical care, which do not always serve as a mechanism for identifying and satisfying merit needs due to institutional and resource limitations.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
N. I. Larionova
Volga State University of Technology
Email: LarionovaNI@volgatech.net
SPIN-code: 6995-9727
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor at the Chair of Economic Theory
Russian Federation, 3, Lenin Sq., Yoshkar-Ola, 424000S. V. Manukyants
Volga State University of Technology
Author for correspondence.
Email: ManukyancSV@volgatech.net
SPIN-code: 5034-5003
Senior Lecturer at the Chair of Economic Theory
Russian Federation, 3, Lenin Sq., Yoshkar-Ola, 424000References
- OECD.Stat. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA [Accessed 19 December 2023].
- Musgrave R. A. The theory of public finance: a study in public economy. New York: McGraw Hill; 1959. 628 p.
- Musgrave R. A. Merit goods. In: Eatwell J., Milgate M., Newman P. (eds.). The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave; 1987. Pp. 452–453.
- Desmarais-Tremblay M. The Normative Problem of Merit Goods in Perspective. Forum for Social Economics. 2019;48(3):219–247. doi: 10.1080/07360932.2016.1196593
- Musgrave R. A., Musgrave P. B. Public finance in theory and practice. Transl. from Engl. Мoscow: Business Atlas Publ.; 2009. 715 p. (In Russ.).
- McLure Ch. E. Merit wants: a Normatively Empty Box. FinanzArchiv. Public Finance Analysis. 1968;27(3):474–483.
- Medema S. G. The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009. 272 p.
- Galbraith J. K. The affluent society. Transl. from Engl.; Bodrunov S. D. (sci. ed. of Rus. ed.). Moscow: Olymp-Business Publ.; 2018. 404 p. (In Russ.).
- Head J. G. Merit Goods Revisited. FinanzArchiv. Public Finance Analysis. 1969;28(2):214–25.
- Rubinstein A. Ya. Introduction to the new methodology of economic analysis. Moscow: IE RAS Publ.; 2012. 58 p. EDN: TWLPCP (In Russ.).
- Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H. Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review. 2003;70(4):1159–1202.
- White M. D. Nudging Merit Goods: Conceptual, Normative, and Practical Connections. Forum for Social Economics. 2019;48(3):248–263. doi: 10.1080/07360932.2016.1196594
- Rubinstein A. Ya. The theory of patronized goods and the paternalism in economic theories: general and special. Moscow: IE RAS Publ., 2015. 52 p. EDN: TWLTUN (In Russ.).
- Pazner E. A. Merit wants and the theory of taxation. Public Finance=Finances Publiques. 1972;27(4):460-472.
- Social determinants of health. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 14 December 2023].
- Federal Law 323-FZ “On the basics of health protection of citizens in the Russian Federation” dated November 21, 2011. Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_121895/ [Accessed 19 December 2023]. (In Russ.).
- Manukyants S. V. Features of the medical services market: theoretical and economic analysis. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series “Economics and Management”. 2023;4(59):15–24. doi: 10.25686/2306-2800.2023.4.15; EDN: JVLPPI (In Russ.).
- State and society: goals, priorities, imperatives. VCIOM: Russian Public Opinion Research Center. Available from: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/gosudarstvo-i-obshchestvo-celi-prioritety-imperativy [Accessed 21 December 2023]. (In Russ.).
- Soboleva E. A. Evolution of the model of public health financing in Russia. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2019;12-3(58):67–75. doi: 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11519; EDN: JIHVJE (In Russ.).
- Faiberg T. V., Scherbakova I. N. Financing of medical care in Russia: sources and problems of their evaluation. Baikal Research Journal. 2021;12(1). Art.7. doi: 10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(1).7; EDN: EUPAKM (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
