Analyzing the Use of Certain Anti-Corruption Practices Based on Digital Technologies in Foreign Countries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article considers the problem of using in foreign countries certain anti-corruption practices based on digital technologies. It is concluded that such technologies are a powerful tool in the fight against corruption, the effective use of which requires additional research to develop appropriate strategies and policies, including those related to the creation of appropriate legal framework.

About the authors

A. O. Stepanov

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: stepanov.alexey99@gmail.com

postgraduate student of the Department of Anti-Corruption Methodology of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Anderson, C.J., & Tverdova, Y.V. (2003). Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.
  2. Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions.
  3. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth.
  4. Wei, S.J. (2000). How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors?
  5. Tanzi, V., & Davoodi, H. (1997). Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth.
  6. Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet skills and the digital divide.
  7. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide.
  8. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills.
  9. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2013). Preparing for life in a digital age.
  10. Solove, D.J. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy.
  11. Culnan, M.J., & Armstrong, P.K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation.
  12. Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles.
  13. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., & Grimes, J.M. (2010). Using ICT to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
  14. Heeks, R., & Mathisen, H. (2011). Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives. Crime, law and social change, 58(5), 533-549.
  15. Kshetri, N. (2014). Big data's impact on privacy, security and consumer welfare. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1134–1145.
  16. Atzori, M. (2015). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary?
  17. Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2016). Where machines could replace humans—and where they can’t (yet). McKinsey Quarterly.
  18. Brabham, D.C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving. Convergence, 14(1), 75-90.
  19. Cecchini, A., & Scott, A. (2003). What's your fraud IQ? Journal of Accountancy, 196(2), 109.
  20. Hussmann, K. (2007). Anti-corruption policy making in practice: What can be learned for implementing Article 5 of UNCAC? U4 Issue, 2007(1).
  21. U.S. Department of Justice. (2019). Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs.
  22. Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2018.
  23. Manion, M. (2014). Corruption by Design: Building Clean Government in Mainland China and Hong Kong.
  24. Kim, S. (2017). The Politics of Anti-Corruption Reform in South Korea.
  25. Sundell, A. (2014). Are formal civil service examinations the most meritocratic way to recruit civil servants? Not in all countries.
  26. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption.
  27. Thai, K.V. (2001). Public Procurement Re-examined.
  28. Andrews, M. (2010). Good government means different things in different countries.
  29. Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters.
  30. Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E., & Schillemans, T. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Representative government — the 21st century: legislation, comments, problems

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).