Comparative analysis of the cyclical components of Russia’s GDP using the Hodrick-Prescott, Baxter-King, and Christiano-Fitzgerald Methods
- Authors: Matantsev A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Humanities University
- Issue: Vol 14, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 229-239
- Section: Mathematical and quantitative methods in economics
- Published: 30.12.2025
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2070-7568/article/view/381858
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/3033-5973-2025-14-4-312
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WEYJYG
- ID: 381858
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Fluctuations in economic activity remain a key focus of macroeconomic analysis, as the phases of the business cycle reflect the economy’s response to external and internal shocks. For Russia, this topic is particularly relevant due to repeated crisis episodes over the past two decades and the need for reliable tools to diagnose phases of growth and recession. A comparison of time-series filtering methods makes it possible to identify which of them provide the most accurate assessment of cyclical fluctuations in GDP.
Purpose – is to conduct a comparative analysis of the cyclical components of Russia’s real GDP extracted using the Hodrick-Prescott (HP), Baxter-King (BK), and Christiano-Fitzgerald (CF) filters.
Materials and methods. Quarterly Russian GDP data for 2003 - 3rd quarter 2025 (at 2021 prices, seasonally adjusted) were obtained from Rosstat. The study employed econometric and statistical methods of time-series analysis: the HP, BK, and CF filters implemented in the Statsmodels package (Python).
Results. The analysis showed that all three methods consistently capture the main recessions in the modern Russian economy – 2009, 2015-2016, and 2020. The BK and CF filters produce nearly identical cyclical trajectories, with a correlation coefficient of about 0.97, indicating their statistical equivalence in business-cycle estimation.
The HP filter generates a higher-frequency, noisier component and smooths the negative phases at the series ends due to the endpoint problem. This results in lower accuracy when identifying short-term downturns (about 75% of crisis quarters compared to 100% for BK and CF).
The extracted cycles reproduce the well-known recessionary periods: the sharp GDP decline in 2009, the contraction in 2015–2016, and the 2020 downturn are captured by all three methods. Band-pass filters (BK and CF) provide a more realistic dynamic that reflects the duration and depth of crisis phases, while HP smooths amplitudes and accelerates the transition to recovery. The novelty of the study lies in the comparative evaluation of three classical filters using a modern Russian dataset, including the most recent observations, and in the quantitative assessment of their ability to accurately detect crisis episodes.
Practical implications. The results can be used for business cycle analysis, assessment of deviations of actual GDP from potential levels, macroeconomic forecasting, and the development of anti-crisis economic policy measures.
About the authors
Anatoly A. Matantsev
Humanities University
Author for correspondence.
Email: amx1375@mail.ru
Postgraduate Student
Russian Federation, 3, Zheleznodorozhnikov Str., Yekaterinburg, 620041, Russian Federation
References
- Gurvich, E. T., & Prilepsky, I. V. (2016). Impact of Financial Sanctions on the Russian Economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (1), 5-35.
- Baxter, M., & King, R. G. (1999). Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 575–593.
- Burns, A. F., & Mitchell, W. C. (1946). Measuring Business Cycles (NBER Books). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Canova, F. (1998). Detrending and Business Cycle Facts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41(3), 475–512.
- Choose Time Series Filter for Business Cycle Analysis: MATLAB & Simulink. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from https://www.mathworks.com/help/econ/choose-time-series-filter-for-business-cycle-analysis.html
- Christiano, L. J., & Fitzgerald, T. J. (2003). The Band Pass Filter. International Economic Review, 44(2), 435–465.
- Comin, D., & Gertler, M. (2006). Medium-Term Business Cycles. American Economic Review, 96(3), 523–551.
- Guay, A., & Saint-Amant, P. (2005). Do the Hodrick-Prescott and Baxter-King Filters Provide a Good Approximation of Business Cycles? Annals of Economics and Statistics, (77), 133–155.
- Hamilton, J. D. (2018). Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 831–843.
- Hasanli, Y., & Rahmanov, R. (2024). Analyzing Business Cycles in Azerbaijan: Application of Various Filters and Spectral Analysis. ICFBME, 33–46.
- Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 1–16.
- King, R. G., & Rebelo, S. T. (1993). Low Frequency Filtering and Real Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17(1-2), 207–231.
- Marcet, A. (2003). The HP-Filter in Cross-Country Comparisons. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2–31.
- Measuring Business Cycle Stylized Facts in Selected Oil-Producing Economies: A Comparative Study. (2024). Journal of Business Cycle Research, 3–6.
- Mise, E., Kim, T.-H., & Newbold, P. (2005). On Suboptimality of the Hodrick-Prescott Filter at Time Series Endpoints. Journal of Macroeconomics, 27(1), 53–67.
- Orphanides, A., & van Norden, S. (2002). The Unreliability of Output-Gap Estimates in Real Time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 569–583.
- Schueler, Y. (2024). Filtering Economic Time Series: On the Cyclical Properties of Hamilton’s Regression Filter and the Hodrick-Prescott Filter. Review of Economic Dynamics, 54.
- Pestova, A. A. (2013). Predicting Turning Points of Business Cycles: Does the Financial Sector Help? Voprosy Ekonomiki, (7), 63-81.
- Smirnov, S. (2010). Factors of Cyclical Vulnerability of the Russian Economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (6), 44–68.
Supplementary files


