Prediction of the Complicated Wound Process in Overweight Patients Depending on the Composition of the Intestinal Microbiota
- Authors: Suhoparova E.P.1, Zinoviev E.V.2, Khrustaleva I.E.3, Kniazeva E.S.4
-
Affiliations:
- The First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
- St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Ambulance named after I. I. Janelidze
- First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
- St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine named after I. I. Janelidze
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 10-17
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2070-478X/article/view/146907
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2023-16-1-10-17
- ID: 146907
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. Overweight and imbalance of the intestinal microbiota are risk factors for disruption of reparative processes during the postoperative wound healing. Given the scale of the obesity epidemic in the modern world, the number of overweight patients undergoing surgery for various reasons is also increasing. The potentiation of the risk of a delayed and complicated course of the wound process combined with obesity and violated composition of the intestinal microbiota determines the relevance of this study.
The aim of the study was to investigate the composition of the intestinal microbiota in patients with increased body weight, with long-term non-healing and complicated surgical wounds.
Methods. The composition of the parietal intestinal microbiota was studied by microbial markers in the blood using gas chromatography in 49 overweight women who underwent planned surgical interventions for aesthetic indications in the period from 2019 to 2020, aimed at correcting body contours. After the operation, women were observed for 6 months, with assessment of the timing of wound healing. We carried out a comparative analysis of the composition of the intestinal microbiota in the different course of the wound process, studied the prognostic significance of individual parameters of the intestinal microbiota in relation to the risk of delayed and complicated wound healing.
Results. In the postoperative period, all patients were divided into three groups: group 1 - complicated wound process (n=21), group 2 - delayed wound process 16 (n=16), group 3 - conventional wound process (n=12). Statistically significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2 in terms of "Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (Gr 1) ≥ 562.0" (621.76±962.03 versus 101.75±371.90, respectively, p=0.025) and "Propionibacterium ≥ 3.2" (77.57 ± 48.57 vs. 40.44 ± 38.15, respectively, p=0.014). Differences were found between groups 1 and 3 in terms of “Endotoxin ≥ 0.7” (0.73±0.58 nmol/ml versus 0.86±0.48 nmol/ml, respectively, p=0.051). The most risk of the complicated and delayed postoperative wound healing is observed when the values of the parameters were "Propionibacterium ≥ 32.0", "Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (Gr 1) ≥ 7.0" and "Endotoxin ≥ 0.7". Based on the decision tree analysis, 4 risk classes of delayed and complicated course of the wound process were identified. Patients with a combination of Propionibacterium ≥ 3.2 and Endotoxin ≥ 0.7 had the highest risk.
Conclusion. A number of parameters of the intestinal microbiota have a high prognostic value regarding the risk of developing a complicated and delayed course of the wound process in overweight individuals. The data obtained can be used to predict unfavorable healing of surgical wounds. Further research is needed in this area on a larger sample of patients, including males.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena Petrovna Suhoparova
The First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Email: suhoparova.e@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7133-0440
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Plastic Surgery
Russian Federation, 197022, Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Leo Tolstoy str., 6-8Evgeny Vladimirovich Zinoviev
St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Ambulance named after I. I. Janelidze
Email: evz@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2812-6839
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Thermal Lesions
Russian Federation, Budapest str., 3, St. Petersburg, 196128, Russian FederationIrina Eduardovna Khrustaleva
First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Email: info@1medplastika.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2187-8117
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Plastic Surgery
Russian Federation, 197022, Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Leo Tolstoy str., 6-8Ekaterina Sergeevna Kniazeva
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine named after I. I. Janelidze
Author for correspondence.
Email: ek98@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1200-6066
Resident of the Department of Plastic Surgery
Russian Federation, Budapest str., 3, St. Petersburg, 196128, Russian FederationReferences
- Aitbaev KA, Murkamilov IT. Intestinal microbiota: its role in pathogenesis of arterial hypertension. Klinicheskaya meditsina. 2017; 95: 2: 123-126. (in Russ). doi: 10.18821/0023-2149-2017-95-2-123-126
- Artemyeva OV, Gankovskaya LV. Inflammaging as the basis of age-associated diseases. Meditsinskaya Immunologiya. 2020; 22: 3: 419-432. (in Russ). doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-IAT-1938
- Sittipo P, Lobionda S, Lee YK, Maynard CL. Intestinal microbiota and the immune system in metabolic diseases. J Microbiol.2018; 56: 3: 154-162. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-7548-y
- Bobunov DN, Iordanishvili AK, Mikhailov VD, ShapurkoON.Role of normal intestinal microflora (microbiotas) in rehabilitation of patients with obesity. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019; 5: 105-110. (in Russ). doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-165-5-105-110
- Adak A, Khan MR. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76: 3:473-493. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4
- Muñoz-Garach A, Diaz-Perdigones C, Tinahones FJ. Gut microbiota and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63: 10:560-568. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2016.07.008
- Pang M, Zhu M, Lei X, Xu P, Cheng B. Microbiome Imbalances: An Overlooked Potential Mechanism in Chronic Nonhealing Wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds.2019; 18: 1: 31-41. doi: 10.1177/1534734619832754
- Yudin SM, Egorova AM, Makarov VV. Analysis of human microbiota. Russian and foreig nexperience. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii.2018; 11: 1: 175-180. (in Russ).
- Belenkov YN, Privalova EV, Kaplunova VY, Zektser VY, Vinogradova NN, Ilgisonis IS, et al. Metabolic Syndrome: development of the issue, main diagnostic criteria. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology.2018; 14: 5: 757-764. (in Russ). doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-5-757-764
- Pence BD, Woods JA. Exercise, Obesity, andCutaneousWoundHealing: Evidence from Rodent and Human Studies. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014; 3: 1: 71-79. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0377.
- Olsson M, Järbrink K, Divakar U, Bajpai R, Upton Z, Schmidtchen A, et al. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27: 1:114-125. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12683.
- Grinevich VB, Radchenko VG. Gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;183: 11: 11-19. (In Russ.)doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-183-11-11-19
- Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, Boccuto L, Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J. Gut Microbiota and Obesity: A Role for Probiotics. Nutrients.2019;11: 11:2690. doi: 10.3390/nu11112690
- Monaghan M, Sreenivasan S. Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome. ClinDermatol. 2018; 36: 1: 14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.09.004
- Pitocco D, Di Leo M, Tartaglione L, De Leva F, Petruzziello C, Saviano A. The role of gut microbiota in mediating obesity and diabetes mellitus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020; 24: 3:1548-1562. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202002_20213
- Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, Almeida M, Arumugam M, Batto JM, Kennedy S, Leonard P, Li J, Burgdorf K, Grarup N, Jørgensen T, Brandslund I, Nielsen HB, Juncker AS, Bertalan M, Levenez F, Pons N, Rasmussen S, Sunagawa S, Tap J, Tims S, Zoetendal EG, Brunak S, Clément K, Doré J, Kleerebezem M, Kristiansen K, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, de Vos WM, Zucker JD, Raes J, Hansen T, MetaHIT consortium; Bork P, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Pedersen O. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013: 500: 541-546.doi: 10.1038/nature12506
- Tang WHW, Bäckhed F, Landmesser U, Hazen SL. Intestinal Microbiota in Cardiovascular Health and Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am CollCardiol. 2019; 73: 16:2089-2105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.024
- Alam A, Neish A. Role of gut microbiota in intestinal wound healing and barrier function. Tissue Barriers. 2018; 6: 3:1539595. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2018.1539595
- Wolcott R, Sanford N, Gabrilska R, Oates JL, Wilkinson JE, Rumbaugh KP. Microbiota is a primary cause of pathogenesis of chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2016;25(Sup10):33-43. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup10.S33
Supplementary files
