The significance of the maxillary sinus volume for planning subantral augmentation and dental implantation (part II)
- Authors: Gatilo I.A.1, Sirak S.V.1, Lenev V.N.1, Budzinsky N.E.1, Yurasov A.Y.2
-
Affiliations:
- Stavropol State Medical University
- Bashkir State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 22, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 71-78
- Section: Original Researches
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1994-9480/article/view/375649
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2025-22-4-71-78
- ID: 375649
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
When planning implant surgery, preceded by sinus lift, it is necessary to study the anatomical and topographic features of the maxillary sinus, specifically its volume, shape, type of pneumatization, the presence of internal bony septa in the sinus floor, and the volume of bone tissue located above the apices of the maxillary teeth.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the volume of the maxillary sinus in men and women of different age groups depending on the composition of the dentition by sectioning skeletonized skulls. A total of 254 certified skulls were examined. Subjects were divided into age groups (25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65 years and older) and groups based on the presence and/or absence of chewing teeth, excluding third molars.
Research methodology: The 254 skeletonized skulls studied were also divided into three groups: the first included 48 skulls with premolars and molars; the second included 148 skulls with at least one missing premolar and/or molar; and the third included 58 skulls with no premolars or molars. A window was cut into the anterior wall of the sinus in the fossa canina region using a micromotor and a carbide bur to better visualize the internal surface of the maxillary sinus. The width, depth, and height of the maxillary sinus were measured, and the volume of the maxillary sinus was then calculated. Cone-beam computed tomography of the skeletonized skulls was also performed, along with measurements of the width, depth, and height of the sinus and a calculation of its volume.
Results of determining the average maxillary sinus volume on dry specimens showed that the largest sinus volume was also observed in men aged 55-64 years, while the smallest was observed in men aged 45–54 years in all three groups, depending on the presence and/or absence of molars in the upper jaw. The sinus volume on the right was larger than on the left in most cases. The loss of molars increases the volume of the maxillary sinus.
About the authors
Irina A. Gatilo
Stavropol State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: chijgay@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0139-5094
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Hygiene named after G.A. Gudzovsky
Russian Federation, StavropolSergey V. Sirak
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: sergejsirak@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4924-5792
MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Dentistry
Russian Federation, StavropolVadim N. Lenev
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: lenevadim@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-5738-5501
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, StavropolNikolay E. Budzinsky
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: n22948121@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-1224-1575
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, StavropolAndrey Y. Yurasov
Bashkir State Medical University
Email: andreyyr@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-1663-3377
Assistant Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry
Russian Federation, UfaReferences
- Zhang Y., Li, J., Wang S. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume changes after sinus floor elevation: a CBCT study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2023;34(2): 150–158. doi: 10.1111/clr.13987.
- Kim H. J., Lee S. J., Park J. H. Influence of maxillary sinus anatomy on the outcome of sinus augmentation: a retrospective CBCT analysis. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2022;52(1):45–54. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2105310265.
- Silva R.A., Costa F.O., de Oliveira R.C. Maxillary sinus volume and its correlation with residual ridge height in edentulous patients: a CBCT study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021;50(7): 924–930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.007.
- Patel N., Singh A. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in planning sinus lift procedures: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2020;46(4): 335–342. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00058.
- Garcia R.C., de Souza A. P. Anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus and their impact on sinus lift surgery: a CBCT study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2020;22(3):314–320. doi: 10.1111/cid.12816.
- Müller F., Schmidt A. Correlation between maxillary sinus pneumatization and alveolar bone height: implications for implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021;25(3): 1235–1242. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03587-3.
- Chen L., Zhang X. Impact of maxillary sinus volume on the success rate of dental implants placed with sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis. Implant Dentistry. 2022;31(5):505–512. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000001311.
- Rossi F., Bianchi A. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary sinus volume and its clinical relevance for sinus floor elevation. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;47(5):720–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.008.
- Wang C., Liu Y. Personalized planning of sinus augmentation based on CBCT volumetric analysis: a clinical study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2023;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00413-7.
- Silva T.M., Pereira F.S. Maxillary sinus volume changes after tooth loss and implications for implant planning. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2020;31(9):834–841. doi: 10.1111/clr.13645.
Supplementary files

