Spinal anesthesia as a method of anesthetic support for arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-center prospective cohort study
- Authors: Gorelov D.V.1, Ovechkin А.М.2, Babayants A.V.1, Ignatenko O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yudin City Clinical Hospital
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 323-333
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1993-6508/article/view/287928
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA634534
- ID: 287928
Cite item
Abstract
Background: The annually increasing number of arthroscopic interventions on cruciate ligaments, especially in outpatient settings, necessitates identifying the most rational methods of anesthetic support for such procedures.
Aim: To evaluate spinal anesthesia (SA) as the method of choice for anesthetic support in arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Materials and methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included 52 patients who underwent arthroscopic cruciate ligament reconstruction under SA. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by measuring pain intensity at rest and during movement at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). The need for opioid analgesics, their total dose, time to the first analgesic request, motor block recovery time (Bromage scale to Bromage-1), and time to first ambulation were recorded. Intraoperative hemodynamic and pulse oximetry parameters, SA performance time, duration of anesthesia and surgery, total dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during hospitalization, complications, adverse anesthesia reactions, and hospital stay duration were also evaluated. Additionally, patient satisfaction with anesthesia and postoperative pain management quality was assessed.
Results: Significant differences in pain levels at rest and during mobilization were observed (p <0.001, R=0.8). A total of 82.6% (n=43) of patients required opioid analgesics postoperatively, with 18% (n=8) needing administration twice or more. The frequency of opioid use was directly proportional to pain severity (p <0.001, R=0.7). The first request for analgesics occurred, on average, at 178 minutes, with motor block recovery at 134 minutes. First ambulation was recorded, on average, more than 3 hours after surgery.
Conclusion: Severe postoperative pain, the inability to achieve early mobilization, adverse anesthesia effects, and the transition of arthroscopic procedures to “day surgery” status emphasize the need for alternative anesthesia techniques that overcome SA shortcomings and provide prolonged postoperative pain relief.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Danil V. Gorelov
Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: GorelovD.V@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9554-2942
SPIN-code: 7893-4040
Russian Federation, 4 Kolomensky driveway, 115446 Moscow
Аlexei М. Ovechkin
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: ovechkin_alexei@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3453-8699
SPIN-code: 1277-9220
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAndrey V. Babayants
Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Email: babayants@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3072-3237
SPIN-code: 2603-9728
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, 4 Kolomensky driveway, 115446 MoscowOlga V. Ignatenko
Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Email: ovignatenko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6353-2552
SPIN-code: 5725-6979
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, 4 Kolomensky driveway, 115446 MoscowReferences
- Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, et al. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502–1507. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944
- Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, et al. Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(11):994–1000. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01618
- Abdallah FW, Brull R, Joshi GP; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA). Pain management for ambulatory arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evidence-based recommendations from the society for ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2019;128(4):631–640. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003976
- Casati A, Cappelleri G, Aldegheri G, et al. Total intravenous anesthesia, spinal anesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004;70(6):493–502.
- Dahl V, Gierløff C, Omland E, Raeder JC. Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for out-patient knee arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(10):1341–1345. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04655.x
- Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(6):1634–1642. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F
- Ovechkin AM, Politov ME, Morozov DV. Neurological complications of regional anesthesia. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2018;12(1):6–14. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2018-12-1-6-14
- Lavand’homme P. Rebound pain after regional anesthesia in the ambulatory patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(6):679–684. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000651
- Sinbukhova EV, Lubnin AYu, Danilov GV, Strunina YuV. Patient’s satisfaction with anesthesia. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2019;(1):50-56. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology201901150
- Borisov DB, Kapinos AA, Tyuryapin AA, et al. Comparison of iliofascial and epidural block in hip replacement. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2012:3:19-21. EDN: PEOLZF
- Andrés-Cano P, Godino M, Vides M, Guerado E. Postoperative complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after ambulatory surgery. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2015;59(3):157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2014.09.001
- Nair GS, Abrishami A, Lermitte J., Chung F. Systematic review of spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(3):307–315. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen389
- Barry G., Bailey J., Sardinha J., Uppal V. Factors associated with rebound pain after peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(4):862–871. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.035
- Terenin M, Titova A, Grechev S, Scheblanova A, Belavus Yu. Rebound pain after peripheral nerve block: a literature review. Surgery. Eastern Europe. 2023;12(3):302–313. doi: 10.34883/PI.2023.12.3.023
- Munoz-Leyva F., Cubillos J., Chin K.J. Managing rebound pain after regional anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020;73(5):372–383. doi: 10.4097/kja.20436
- Gomzhina EA. The effect of early use of rehabilitation techniques after arthroscopic surgery on the restoration of the function of the operated joint. Smolensk Medical Almanac. 2019;(3):33–36. EDN: RXXMNQ
- Derevyanko II. Complicated urinary tract infections: diagnosis and treatment. Consilium medicum. 2003;5(7):376–380. EDN: WJJLCV
- Apfel CC, Läärä E, Koivuranta M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):693–700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022
- Terenin MA, Iаlonetskii IZ, Grachev SS, et al. Review of the 4th edition of the guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Military Medicine. 2022;(1(62):88–107. doi: 10.51922/2074-5044.2022.1.88
Supplementary files
