Peculiarities of foreign language teaching on a linguocognitive basis in modern educational reality (by the example of negation in English)
- Authors: Motov S.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Issue: Vol 26, No 195 (2021)
- Pages: 50-59
- Section: ТЕОРИЯ И МЕТОДИКА ОБУЧЕНИЯ ИНОСТРАННОМУ ЯЗЫКУ В ВЫСШЕЙ ШКОЛЕ
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1810-0201/article/view/298508
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-195-50-59
- ID: 298508
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We consider the peculiarities and prospects of modern methods of teaching English in their connection with the cognitive sciences. The key aspects of teaching English within the framework of the communicative-cognitive approach using cognitive linguistics as a linguistic basis are considered. The importance of the balance of the communicative and cognitive aspects of a foreign language lesson is substantiated while providing evidence in favor of the effectiveness of teaching a foreign language, which is of a communicative and cognitive nature. We provide examples of possible difficulties occurring while organizing foreign language teaching and suggest some ways to overcome those difficulties. The prospects for the development of communicativeoriented teaching of a foreign language are outlined. We provide evidence for high potential of foreign language teaching organized on a linguocognitive basis, in particular in a number of cases that are difficult for traditional approaches. By the example of negation in English, the effectiveness of teaching a foreign language on a linguocognitive basis is substantiated. We provide a classification of functional characteristics of negation from the standpoint of cognitive linguistics. It substantiates the potential of using role-playing games and sketches in the structure of a communicative-cognitive lesson, based on the principles of cognitive linguistics. We provide a set of examples of role-play games and sketches for teaching negation in English on a linguocognitive basis and provides evidence for their high potential in teaching the theoretical and practical aspects of English.
Keywords
About the authors
S. V. Motov
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Derzhavin Tambov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: sv-motov@wiu.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2897-5128
Research Scholar of Slavic Languages and Literatures Department; Senior Lecturer of Foreign Languages and Professional Translation Department
707 S Matthews St., Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States of America; 33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Thompson G. Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal, 1996, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 9-15.
- Bim I.L. Teoriya i praktika obucheniya nemetskomu yazyku v sredney shkole. Problemy i perspektivy [Theory and Practice of Teaching German in High School. Issues and Perspectives]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1988, 255 p. (In Russian).
- Shamov A.N. Kognitivnaya paradigma v obuchenii leksicheskoy storone inoiazychnoy rechi [The Cognitive Paradigm in Teaching Foreign Lexis]. Nizhny Novgorod, The Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod Publ., 2009, 242 p. (In Russian).
- Shchepilova A.V. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya frantsuzskomu yazyku kak vtoromu inostrannomu [Theory and Methods of Teaching French as a Second Foreign Language]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 2005, 245 p. (In Russian).
- Passov E.I., Kuzovleva N.E. Osnovy kommunikativnoy teorii i tekhnologii inoyazychnogo obrazovaniya [Foun-dations of Communicative Theory and Technology of Foreign Language Education]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk. Kursy Publ., 2010, 568 p. (In Russian).
- Kravchenko A.V., Payunena M.V. Praktika v plenu u teorii: pochemu tak trudno nauchitsya inostrannomu yazyku v shkole [Practice held hostage to theory: why it is so hard to learn a foreign language at school]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia – Tomsk State University Journal. Philology, 2018, no. 56, pp. 65-91. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/56/5. (In Russian).
- Kubryakova E.S. Nachal’nye etapy stanovleniya kognitivizma: lingvistika – psikhologiia – kognitivnaya nauka [The beginning stages of cognitivism: linguistics – psychology – cognitive science]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Issues of Linguistics, 1994, no. 4, pp. 34-47. (In Russian).
- Belyaev B.V. O primenenii printsipa soznatel’nosti v obuchenii inostrannomu yazyku [On using the principle of consciousness in teaching foreign languages]. Psikhologiya v obuchenii inostrannomu yazyku [Psychology in Foreign Language Teaching]. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1967, pp. 5-17. (In Russian).
- Shamim F. Learner resistance to innovation in classroom methodology. Society and the Language Classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 105-121.
- Polyakov O.G. Lingvisticheskiye apekty proektirovaniya kursa angliyskogo yazyka dlya spetsialnykh tseley [Linguistic aspects of English course design for special purposes]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i prakti-ki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 12 (30), pt 1, pp. 165-168. (In Russian).
- Kravchenko A.V. Vremya razobratsiya s vremenami ili kak usvoit’ sistemu angliiskikh vremen [It is time to deal with the tenses or how to understand the system of English tenses]. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole – Foreign Lan-guages at School, 2002, no. 5, pp. 69-71. (In Russian).
- Millrud R.P., Karamnov A.S. Podkhody k izucheniyu anglijskikh modalnykh glagolov [Approaches to English modal verbs studies]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Re-view. Series: Humanities, 2008, no. 8 (64), pp. 174-182. (In Russian).
- Motov S.V. Obucheniye grammatike angliyskogo yazyka na lingvokognitivnoy osnove [Teaching English grammar on linguocognitive basis]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2019, vol. 24, no. 179, pp. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-179-32-39. (In Russian).
- Gil K.H., Marsden H., Whong M. The meaning of negation in the second language classroom: evidence from “Any”. Language Teaching Research, 2019, no. 23 (2), pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1362168817740144
- Boldyrev N.N. Yazyk i sistema znaniy. Kognitivnaya teoriya yazyka [Language and System of Knowledge. Cog-nitive Theory of Language]. Moscow, Publishing House YaSK, 2018, 480 p. (In Russian).
- Motov S.V. Linguocognitive Foundations of Teaching English Negation. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2020, vol. 25, no. 187, pp. 37-45. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-187-37-45
- Giovanelli M. Teaching Grammar, Structure and Meaning. Exploring Theory and Practice for Post-16 English Language Teachers. London, Routledge Publ., 2014, 148 p.
- Giovanelli M. Cognitive linguistics in the English classroom: new possibilities for thinking about teaching grammar. Teaching English, 2013, vol. 3, pp. 61-65.
- Rosch, E.H. Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 192-233.
- Ter-Minasova S.G. Yazyk i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and Cross-Cultural Communication]. Moscow, Slovo Publ., 2000, 164 p. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
