Modern approaches to surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects: a review
- Authors: Guyter O.S.1, Strelnikova N.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
- Issue: Vol 29, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 468-478
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/1728-2802/article/view/366878
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent691696
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJHOYB
- ID: 366878
Cite item
Abstract
Restoring the integrity and function of the maxilla after resections, trauma, or congenital anomalies remains one of the most challenging tasks in oral and maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics. Although numerous surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation techniques exist, the lack of unified, defect-oriented treatment algorithms leads to variable and often suboptimal functional and esthetic outcomes.
This review analyzed 235 articles and extracted data from 30 scientific papers published between 2019 and 2025 that addressed the rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects. Current surgical techniques were examined, including microsurgical reconstruction with vascularized free flaps and the use of patient-specific titanium implants. Contemporary prosthodontic approaches were also discussed, such as digital prosthesis fabrication and implant-supported prosthodontics. Particular emphasis was placed on the integration of digital technologies, such as virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM workflows, across all stages of treatment.
The aim of this review was to analyze the available methods for rehabilitating patients with acquired maxillary defects and to assess their impact on patient quality of life and long-term outcomes. The review demonstrates a clear trend toward multidisciplinary and digitally driven care pathways that yield predictable functional and esthetic results. Key determinants guiding the choice of treatment modality include defect location and size, presence of remaining dentition, condition of the soft tissues, history of radiation therapy, and overall patient status.
About the authors
Olga S. Guyter
Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Email: gos.stam@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1707-7015
SPIN-code: 7745-4210
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, RyazanNatalia I. Strelnikova
Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Author for correspondence.
Email: nataly_strelnikova1994@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2749-0778
MD
Russian Federation, RyazanReferences
- Cordeiro PG. The fibula osteocutaneous free flap: surgical approach. In: De Santis G, Cordeiro P, Chiarini L, editors. Atlas of mandibular and maxillary reconstruction with the fibula flap. Springer, Cham; 2019. P. 13–17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-10684-3_3
- Nazaryan DN, Karayan AS, Mokhirev MA, et al. Formation of soft tissues in the oral cavity around dental structures on the neo-alveolar processes made of free revascularized fibular autograft with intraosseous dental implants. Head and Neck. Russian Journal. 2022;10(3):25–36. doi: 10.25792/HN.2022.10.3.25-36 EDN: GIQLYX
- Nazaryan DN, Lyashev IN, Mokhirev MA, Kyalov GG. Microsurgical reconstruction of postoperative mandibular defect using vascularized fibular bone-muscle autograft with simultaneous implantation and prosthetic restoration of upper and lower jaws. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;(1):87–93. doi: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202001187 EDN: QYKPQH
- Sass T, Piffkó J, Braunitzer G, Oberna F. Esthetic and functional reconstruction of large mandibular defects using free fibula flap and implant-retained prosthetics–a case series with long-term follow-up. Head Face Med. 2021;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00297-9 EDN: UNCEQV
- Tangieva ZA. Clinical and morphological evaluation of the use of revascularized autografts in patients with defects and deformities of the jaws during dental implantation [dissertation]. Moscow, 2022. (In Russ.) EDN: VFNPYT
- Zhao X, Ding M, Diarra D, et al. Iliac crest free flap versus fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: Cost-effectiveness analysis in a Chinese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025;53(9):1399–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.007
- Cardín AA, Pereira A, Mendes A, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with horizontally oriented scapular tip free flap: outcomes in orbital support and palate closure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;95:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.042 EDN: LFRSAV
- Abo Sharkh H, Makhoul N. In-house surgeon-led virtual surgical planning for maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(4):651–660. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.013
- Bolotin MV, Mudunov AM, Sobolevsky VY, Sokorutov VI. Algorithm of reconstruction combined midface defects after resection malignant tumors. Head and Neck Tumors. 2022;12(2):41–54. doi: 10.17650/2222-1468-2022-12-2-41-54 EDN: YZXVGN
- Patent RUS № 2751740 C1/ 07.16.2021. Mudunov AM, Bolotin MV, Krasovskii IB, Panchenko AA. Method and device for reconstruction of defects of upper jaw. EDN: OTPPQN
- Ciocca L, Maltauro M, Cimini V, et al. Analysis of the trueness and precision of complete denture bases manufactured using digital and analog technologies. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15(1):22–32. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.22 EDN: IBVMHG
- Ponomarev IV, Zakirova AA, Svyatoslavov DS, et al. Experience of clinical application of customized titanium implants created with additive manufacturing methods in maxillofacial surgery. Head and Neck. Russian Journal.2024;12(4):134–140. doi: 10.25792/HN.2024.12.4.134-140 EDN: EMMMUC
- Nyirjesy SC, Heller M, von Windheim N, et al. The role of computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3-dimensional printing in head and neck oncologic surgery: A review and future directions. Oral Oncol. 2022;132:105976. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105976
- Tereshchuk SV, Ivanov SYu, Sukharev VA, Vasiliev EA. Reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects using a lateral scapular border flap. Head and Neck. Russian Journal. 2021;9(3):25–33. doi: 10.25792/HN.2021.9.3.25-33 EDN: NZHDOA
- Boffano P, Neirotti F, Ruslin M, Brucoli M. CAD/CAM and maxillary obturators in head and neck cancer patients: a review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;77(8):3273–3278. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05627-w
- Zhdanov DV, Barkova DA, Yavorsky ED. Manufacturing of complete removable dentures using CAD/CAM computer technology. In: Proceedings of the VII All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation “Сurrent issues in pediatric dentistry”. Kazan: Kazan State Medical University; 2024. P. 89–91. (In Russ.) EDN: EMKTDE
- Abakarov SI, Kulakov AA, Losev FF, et al. Orthopedic treatment of maxillary defects with the use of the residual resection prosthesis with pneumatic obturator. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2020;99(5):74–79. doi: 10.17116/stomat20209905174 EDN: ALZXED
- Arantes DC, Rodrigues RAA, de Arruda JAA, et al. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with resection of squamous cell carcinoma: a report of two cases. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020;11(3):294–297. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_320_19 EDN: CLPAKK
- Abdulaziz LR, Allawi SS, Diploma H. Comparison between removable maxillary obturator prosthesis and implant supported maxillary obturator: a review. JODR. 2024;11(2):42–50. doi: 10.58827/328826jrrana
- Manju V, Krishnapriya VN, Babu AS, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation options in post-ablative maxillomandibular microvascular reconstructions. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(Suppl 1):10–19. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01883-x EDN: XDQNQO
- Gangwani P, Almana M, Barmak B, Kolokythas A. What is the success of implants placed in fibula flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022;13(1):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13103 EDN: MNVVJJ
- Karaseva VV. Application of up-to-date methods in step-by-step orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with defects in the maxillofacial region. Medical Newsletter of Vyatka. 2020;(3):116–120. doi: 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10119 EDN: PIBDYM
- Put’ VA, Solodkiy VG, Reshetov IV, et al. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with an extensive maxillofacial defect. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2020;99(5):87–91. doi: 10.17116/stomat20209905187 EDN: UOVBUG
- Barraclough O, Patel J, Milne S, et al. Pathways for the rehabilitation of resection defects in the maxilla. Br Dent J. 2022;232(11):783–789. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4342-3 EDN: ZVQJNW
- Glebova MS, Glebov GS, Sletova VA, et al. Dental implantation after reconstruction of total and subtotal defects of the upper and lower jaws. International Journal of Innovative Medicine. 2023;(2):18–20. doi: 10.33667/2782-4101-2023-2-18-20 EDN: EHTJVP
- Otomaru T, Sumita Yu. A digital duplicating obturator with 3D printing technology. International Journal of Maxillofacial Prosthetics. 2024;7(1):16–19. doi: 10.26629/ijmp.2024.05 EDN: RXBQBW
- Apresyan SV, Stepanov AG. Digital methods for manufacturing removable dentures. In: Proceedings of the VI All-Russian scientific and practical conference “3D TECHNOLOGIES IN MEDICINE”. Nizhny Novgorod: Privolzhsky Research Medical University; 2020. P. 9–10. (In Russ.) EDN: DJBFVZ
- Kulbakin DE, Choynzonov EL, Mukhamedov MR, et al. Reconstructive surgery complications in head and neck cancer patients. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2021;20(1):53–61. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-1-53-61 EDN: REUONR
- Nurieva NS, Kiparisov YuS, Galonsky VG. Evaluation of adaptation to maxillary obturator prostheses using axiography and cone beam computed tomography techniques. In: Actual problems of pediatric dentistry. Proceedings of the VII All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Irkutsk: INCHT; 2021. (In Russ.) EDN: JXAZVC
- Quadri MFA, Alamir AWH, John T, et al. Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(4):3107–3118. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.48
Supplementary files

