Modern approaches to surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects: a review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Restoring the integrity and function of the maxilla after resections, trauma, or congenital anomalies remains one of the most challenging tasks in oral and maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics. Although numerous surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation techniques exist, the lack of unified, defect-oriented treatment algorithms leads to variable and often suboptimal functional and esthetic outcomes.

This review analyzed 235 articles and extracted data from 30 scientific papers published between 2019 and 2025 that addressed the rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects. Current surgical techniques were examined, including microsurgical reconstruction with vascularized free flaps and the use of patient-specific titanium implants. Contemporary prosthodontic approaches were also discussed, such as digital prosthesis fabrication and implant-supported prosthodontics. Particular emphasis was placed on the integration of digital technologies, such as virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM workflows, across all stages of treatment.

The aim of this review was to analyze the available methods for rehabilitating patients with acquired maxillary defects and to assess their impact on patient quality of life and long-term outcomes. The review demonstrates a clear trend toward multidisciplinary and digitally driven care pathways that yield predictable functional and esthetic results. Key determinants guiding the choice of treatment modality include defect location and size, presence of remaining dentition, condition of the soft tissues, history of radiation therapy, and overall patient status.

About the authors

Olga S. Guyter

Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov

Email: gos.stam@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1707-7015
SPIN-code: 7745-4210

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Natalia I. Strelnikova

Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov

Author for correspondence.
Email: nataly_strelnikova1994@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2749-0778

MD

Russian Federation, Ryazan

References

  1. Cordeiro PG. The fibula osteocutaneous free flap: surgical approach. In: De Santis G, Cordeiro P, Chiarini L, editors. Atlas of mandibular and maxillary reconstruction with the fibula flap. Springer, Cham; 2019. P. 13–17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-10684-3_3
  2. Nazaryan DN, Karayan AS, Mokhirev MA, et al. Formation of soft tissues in the oral cavity around dental structures on the neo-alveolar processes made of free revascularized fibular autograft with intraosseous dental implants. Head and Neck. Russian Journal. 2022;10(3):25–36. doi: 10.25792/HN.2022.10.3.25-36 EDN: GIQLYX
  3. Nazaryan DN, Lyashev IN, Mokhirev MA, Kyalov GG. Microsurgical reconstruction of postoperative mandibular defect using vascularized fibular bone-muscle autograft with simultaneous implantation and prosthetic restoration of upper and lower jaws. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;(1):87–93. doi: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202001187 EDN: QYKPQH
  4. Sass T, Piffkó J, Braunitzer G, Oberna F. Esthetic and functional reconstruction of large mandibular defects using free fibula flap and implant-retained prosthetics–a case series with long-term follow-up. Head Face Med. 2021;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00297-9 EDN: UNCEQV
  5. Tangieva ZA. Clinical and morphological evaluation of the use of revascularized autografts in patients with defects and deformities of the jaws during dental implantation [dissertation]. Moscow, 2022. (In Russ.) EDN: VFNPYT
  6. Zhao X, Ding M, Diarra D, et al. Iliac crest free flap versus fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: Cost-effectiveness analysis in a Chinese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025;53(9):1399–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.007
  7. Cardín AA, Pereira A, Mendes A, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with horizontally oriented scapular tip free flap: outcomes in orbital support and palate closure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;95:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.042 EDN: LFRSAV
  8. Abo Sharkh H, Makhoul N. In-house surgeon-led virtual surgical planning for maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(4):651–660. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.013
  9. Bolotin MV, Mudunov AM, Sobolevsky VY, Sokorutov VI. Algorithm of reconstruction combined midface defects after resection malignant tumors. Head and Neck Tumors. 2022;12(2):41–54. doi: 10.17650/2222-1468-2022-12-2-41-54 EDN: YZXVGN
  10. Patent RUS № 2751740 C1/ 07.16.2021. Mudunov AM, Bolotin MV, Krasovskii IB, Panchenko AA. Method and device for reconstruction of defects of upper jaw. EDN: OTPPQN
  11. Ciocca L, Maltauro M, Cimini V, et al. Analysis of the trueness and precision of complete denture bases manufactured using digital and analog technologies. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15(1):22–32. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.22 EDN: IBVMHG
  12. Ponomarev IV, Zakirova AA, Svyatoslavov DS, et al. Experience of clinical application of customized titanium implants created with additive manufacturing methods in maxillofacial surgery. Head and Neck. Russian Journal.2024;12(4):134–140. doi: 10.25792/HN.2024.12.4.134-140 EDN: EMMMUC
  13. Nyirjesy SC, Heller M, von Windheim N, et al. The role of computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3-dimensional printing in head and neck oncologic surgery: A review and future directions. Oral Oncol. 2022;132:105976. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105976
  14. Tereshchuk SV, Ivanov SYu, Sukharev VA, Vasiliev EA. Reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects using a lateral scapular border flap. Head and Neck. Russian Journal. 2021;9(3):25–33. doi: 10.25792/HN.2021.9.3.25-33 EDN: NZHDOA
  15. Boffano P, Neirotti F, Ruslin M, Brucoli M. CAD/CAM and maxillary obturators in head and neck cancer patients: a review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;77(8):3273–3278. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05627-w
  16. Zhdanov DV, Barkova DA, Yavorsky ED. Manufacturing of complete removable dentures using CAD/CAM computer technology. In: Proceedings of the VII All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation “Сurrent issues in pediatric dentistry”. Kazan: Kazan State Medical University; 2024. P. 89–91. (In Russ.) EDN: EMKTDE
  17. Abakarov SI, Kulakov AA, Losev FF, et al. Orthopedic treatment of maxillary defects with the use of the residual resection prosthesis with pneumatic obturator. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2020;99(5):74–79. doi: 10.17116/stomat20209905174 EDN: ALZXED
  18. Arantes DC, Rodrigues RAA, de Arruda JAA, et al. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with resection of squamous cell carcinoma: a report of two cases. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020;11(3):294–297. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_320_19 EDN: CLPAKK
  19. Abdulaziz LR, Allawi SS, Diploma H. Comparison between removable maxillary obturator prosthesis and implant supported maxillary obturator: a review. JODR. 2024;11(2):42–50. doi: 10.58827/328826jrrana
  20. Manju V, Krishnapriya VN, Babu AS, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation options in post-ablative maxillomandibular microvascular reconstructions. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(Suppl 1):10–19. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01883-x EDN: XDQNQO
  21. Gangwani P, Almana M, Barmak B, Kolokythas A. What is the success of implants placed in fibula flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022;13(1):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13103 EDN: MNVVJJ
  22. Karaseva VV. Application of up-to-date methods in step-by-step orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with defects in the maxillofacial region. Medical Newsletter of Vyatka. 2020;(3):116–120. doi: 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10119 EDN: PIBDYM
  23. Put’ VA, Solodkiy VG, Reshetov IV, et al. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with an extensive maxillofacial defect. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2020;99(5):87–91. doi: 10.17116/stomat20209905187 EDN: UOVBUG
  24. Barraclough O, Patel J, Milne S, et al. Pathways for the rehabilitation of resection defects in the maxilla. Br Dent J. 2022;232(11):783–789. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4342-3 EDN: ZVQJNW
  25. Glebova MS, Glebov GS, Sletova VA, et al. Dental implantation after reconstruction of total and subtotal defects of the upper and lower jaws. International Journal of Innovative Medicine. 2023;(2):18–20. doi: 10.33667/2782-4101-2023-2-18-20 EDN: EHTJVP
  26. Otomaru T, Sumita Yu. A digital duplicating obturator with 3D printing technology. International Journal of Maxillofacial Prosthetics. 2024;7(1):16–19. doi: 10.26629/ijmp.2024.05 EDN: RXBQBW
  27. Apresyan SV, Stepanov AG. Digital methods for manufacturing removable dentures. In: Proceedings of the VI All-Russian scientific and practical conference “3D TECHNOLOGIES IN MEDICINE”. Nizhny Novgorod: Privolzhsky Research Medical University; 2020. P. 9–10. (In Russ.) EDN: DJBFVZ
  28. Kulbakin DE, Choynzonov EL, Mukhamedov MR, et al. Reconstructive surgery complications in head and neck cancer patients. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2021;20(1):53–61. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-1-53-61 EDN: REUONR
  29. Nurieva NS, Kiparisov YuS, Galonsky VG. Evaluation of adaptation to maxillary obturator prostheses using axiography and cone beam computed tomography techniques. In: Actual problems of pediatric dentistry. Proceedings of the VII All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Irkutsk: INCHT; 2021. (In Russ.) EDN: JXAZVC
  30. Quadri MFA, Alamir AWH, John T, et al. Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(4):3107–3118. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.48

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).