


No 1 (2025)
Top problem
A Year of War. Analyzing Public Mood in Israel
Abstract



Politics, economics
China. The Strategy of Military-Civil Integration
Abstract



Singapore and Hong Kong are Leaders of Asia in FinTech and ICT Industries Development
Abstract



Political Sufism in Contemporary Pakistan: The Key Aspects
Abstract



Differences in Thinking Patterns between Chinese and Russians
Abstract
Our brains are wired to think and process information differently depending on our upbringing, the way we are socialized, the language we use, and our genes. When it comes to Chinese and Russians, thinking patterns differ greatly. These patterns play a crucial role in shaping our behavior, beliefs and emotions. In order to summarize the origins of differences, the paper examines language structure, geographical location, philosophy, religion and beliefs, educational methods and modern living conditions of two countries. In addition to that, the paper lists a number of key differences between Chinese and Russian verbal and non-verbal thinking patterns. Chinese people tend to use visual, circular, subjective, “outside-in”, comprehensive and “collectivist” thinking, while Russians prefer logical, linear, objective, “inside-out”, analytical and “individualistic” thinking. The author tries to explain the reasons why the differences exist and illustrates how cultural and language expression is influenced by the way we think.



Professional Backgrounds and Water Governance Strategies: A Case Study of Nile Basin Countries
Abstract
Water security is a critical issue in the Nile Basin, where countries rely on the shared waters of the Nile River for various purposes including agriculture, industry, and domestic use. However, the resolution of water security issues in the region has been challenging due to competing interests and conflicts among the Nile Basin countries. This article aims to investigate whether there is a difference in the approach to resolving water security issues in the Nile Basin depending on the professional background of the presidents leading these countries. To conduct this research, a mixed methods approach of QCA analysis and thematic analysis are employed. The researchers analyze the approach of each president in the Nile Basin and how it affected the negotiation process or led to armed conflicts among these countries. This analysis also takes into account the use of principles and water laws to clarify the legal aspects of the water security issue. The main finding of this research is that the military and civil background of presidents does indeed have an impact on their approach to resolving water security issues in the Nile Basin, leading to varying negotiation processes and potential conflicts among countries. On the other hand, presidents with civil backgrounds tend to prioritize diplomatic negotiations and cooperation, seeking peaceful resolutions to water security issues.



Black Jews of South Africa: The Lemba People
Abstract



Post-graduate tribune
Effective Municipal Solid Waste Management in Rural Areas as a Result of Environmental Education Policy in Japan
Abstract



Scientific life
85 Years of the Victory at Khalkhin Gol: A New Look at the Historical Event
Abstract



Pages of history
Julius Nyerere: Ideals and Reality
Abstract


