Traditions, continuity and innovations in psychological and historical-scientific cognition

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The text was prepared in the order of the discussion on the pages of the Psychological Journal of the article by Yu.N. Oleinik and A.L. Zhuravlev “Scientific traditions as a mechanism of continuity of psycholo-gical cognition”, published in two parts: Part 1. — “The state and difficulties of studying” and Part 2. — “Problems and prospects of research” (Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, № 3–4, 2024). The valuable ideas of the article under discussion, which are important for psychological science and its history, are noted; in addition, controversial provisions are highlighted, and options for their correction and addition are proposed.

Sobre autores

O. Noskova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: nog4813@mail.ru
125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya str., 11/9, Russia.

Bibliografia

  1. Bogdanov A.A. Nauka ob obshhestvennom soznanii. Kratkij kurs ideologicheskoj nauki v voprosah i otvetah. Moscow: Knigoizdatel’stvo pisatelej v Moskve, 1914. 199 p.
  2. Gajdenko P.P. Vvedenie. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 3–11.
  3. Gusel’ceva M.S. Ponjatie progressa i ego otrazhenie v naukah o cheloveke. Progress psihologii: Kriterii i priznaki. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, T.D. Marcinkovskaya, A.V. Jurevich. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2009. P. 13–31.
  4. Kuznecova N.I., Rozov M.A. O raznoobrazii nauchnyh revoljucij. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 60–82.
  5. Nosulenko V.N., Terehin V.A. Peredacha znanij: obzor osnovnyh modelej i tehnologij. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 96–115.
  6. Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 1. Sostojanie i trudnosti izuchenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 3. P. 5–14.
  7. Olejnik Ju.N. Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 2. Problemy, podhody i perspektivy issledovanija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 4. P. 5–15.
  8. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 264 p.
  9. Shackij E. Utopija i tradicija: Perev. s pol’sk. Ed. V.A. Chalikova. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 454 p.
  10. Jurevich A.V. Psihologija i metodologija. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2005. 312 p.
  11. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creat the Dinamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).