Quantum chemical study of the reaction of N,O-dimethylcarbamate with methylamine monomer and dimer
- Authors: Samuilov A.Y.1, Kozhanova E.P.1, Samuilov Y.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan National Research Technological University
- Issue: Vol 99, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 205-215
- Section: ХИМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕРМОДИНАМИКА И ТЕРМОХИМИЯ
- Submitted: 19.05.2025
- Accepted: 19.05.2025
- Published: 20.05.2025
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0044-4537/article/view/292411
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453725020052
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DEEWIP
- ID: 292411
Cite item
Abstract
Reactions of N,O-dimethylcarbamate with methylamine monomer and dimer as a model for the polyurea preparation are studied by B3LYP and M06 quantum-chemical methods. Both a one-step interaction mechanism and a two-step route with an intermediate formed containing a tetracoordinated carbon atom are considered. The latter route is unlikely since the formation of the intermediate is characterized by small values of the equilibrium constants. Reactions involving the methylamine dimer are more favorable kinetically and thermodynamically. Kinetic preference of reactions with methylamine dimer participation is due to its increased donor and acid-base properties as compared to its monomer. The thermodynamic preference of interaction with methylamine dimer is due to a higher entropy of transformation as compared to the reaction with its monomer.
About the authors
A. Y. Samuilov
Kazan National Research Technological University
Email: ysamuilov@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan
E. P. Kozhanova
Kazan National Research Technological University
Email: ysamuilov@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan
Ya. D. Samuilov
Kazan National Research Technological University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ysamuilov@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan
References
- Shojaei B., Najafi M., Yazdanbakhsh A. et al. // Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021. V.32. № 8. P. 2797. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5277
- Wang Y., Ding L., Lin J. et al. // Polymers. 2024. V. 16. № 3. P. 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16030440
- Leventis N. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 5. P. 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050969
- Zhang Z., Qian L., Cheng J. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2023. V. 35. № 4. P. 1806. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03782
- Zhang Z., Qian L., Huang G. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024. V. 34. № 4. P. 2310603. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202310603
- Polyurea: Synthesis, Properties, Composites, Production, and Applications / Eds. P. Pasbakhsh, D. Mohotti, K. Palaniandy et al. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2023. 430 p.
- Tripathi M., Parthasarathy S., Roy P.K. // J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020. V. 137. № 16. P. 48573. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48573
- Sonnenschein M.F. Polyurethanes: science, technology, markets, and trends. Hoboken: Wiley, 2021. 492 p.
- Isocyanates: Sampling, Analysis, and Health Effects / Eds. J. Lesage, I. DeGraff, R. Danchik. West Conshohocken: ASTM Int., 2001. 133 p.
- MDI and TDI: safety, health and the environment: a source book and practical guide / Eds. D.C. Allport, D.S. Gilbert, S.M. Outterside. Chichester: Wiley, 2003. 438 p.
- Santana J.S., Cardoso E.S., Triboni E.R. et al. // Polymers. 2021. V. 13. № 24. P. 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244393
- Pyo S.H., Park J.H., Chang T.S. et al. // CRGSC. 2017. V. 5. P. 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.03.012
- Montero R., Lamas I., León I. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019. V. 21. № 6. P. 3098. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP06416D
- Pérez C., León I., Lesarri A. et al. // Ang. Chem. 2018. V. 130. № 46. P. 15332. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201808602
- Malloum A., Conradie J. // J. Mol. Liq. 2021. V. 336. P. 116199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116199
- Brutschy B., Bisling P., Rühl E. et al. // Z. Phys. D – Atoms Molec. Clusters. 1987. V. 5. P. 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01436927
- Zhang B.B., Kong X.T., Jiang S.K. et al. // Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2017. V. 30. № 6. P. 691. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b08096
- Mishra S., Nguyen H.Q., Huang Q.R. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 153. № 19. P. 194301. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025778
- Huang Q.R., Endo T., Mishra S. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 23. № 6. P. 3739. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp05745b
- Hayama S., Wasse J.C., Skipper N.T. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001. V. 106. № 1. P. 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/002689700 10020023
- Kosztolányi T., Bakó I., Pálinkás G. // J. Chem. Phys. 2003. V. 118. № 10. P. 4546. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1543143
- Frisch M.J., Trucks G.W., Schlegel H.B., Scuseria G.E., Robb M.A., Cheeseman J.R., Scalmani G., Barone V., Mennucci B., Petersson G.A., Nakatsuji H., Caricato M., Li X., Hratchian H.P., Izmaylov A.F., Bloino J., Zheng G., Sonnenberg J.L., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fukuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Nakajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Vreven T., Montgomery J.A., Peralta J.E., Ogliaro F., Bearpark M., Heyd J.J., Brothers E., Kudin K.N., Staroverov V.N., Kobayashi R., Normand J., Raghavachari K., Rendell A., Burant J.C., Iyengar S.S., Tomasi J., Cossi M., Rega N., Millam J.M., Klene M., Knox J.E., Cross J.B., Bakken V., Adamo C., Jaramillo J., Gomperts R., Stratmann R.E., Yazyev O., Austin A.J., Cammi R., Pomelli C., Ochterski J.W., Martin R.L., Morokuma K., Zakrzewski V.G., Voth G.A., Salvador P., Dannenberg J.J., Dapprich S., Daniels A.D., Farkas O., Foresman J.B., Ortiz J.V., Cioslowski J., Fox D.J. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2009.
- Becke A.D. // J. Chem. Phys. 1992. V. 96. № 3. P. 2155. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.462066
- Becke A.D. // J. Chem. Phys. 1992. V. 97. № 12. P. 9173. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463343
- Becke A.D. // J. Chem. Phys. 1993. V. 98. № 7. P. 5648. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
- Zhao Y., Truhlar D.C. // Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008. V. 120. P. 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x
- Sholl D.S., Steckel J.A. Density functional theory: a practical introduction / Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 2023. 224 p.
- Zhao Y., Truhlar D.C. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2008. V. 41. № 2. P. 157. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar700111a
- Keeler J., Wothers P. Chemical Structure and Reactivity: an Integrated Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. 877 p.
- Maksic Z.B., Kovacevic B., Vianello R. // Chem. Rev. 2012. V. 112. № 10. P. 5240. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100458v
- Cabaleiro-Lago E.M., Rodrı́guez-Otero J. // J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM. 2002. V. 586. № 1–3. P. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00068-4
- Mishra S., Nguyen H.Q., Huang Q.R. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2020. V. 153. № 19. P. 194301. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025778
- Zipse H., Wang L.H., Houk K.N. // Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1996. V. 1996. № 10. P. 1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.199619961004
- Wang L.H., Zipse H. // Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1996. V. 1996. № 10. P. 1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.199619961003
- Kakuchi R., Fukasawa K., Kikuchi M. et al. // Macromolecules. 2021. V. 54. № 1. P. 364. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02078
- Zabalov M.V., Levina M.A., Krasheninnikov V.G. et al. // Polymer Sci. Ser. B. 2023. V. 65. № 4. P. 467. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560090423701063
- Zabalov M.V., Tiger R.P., Berlin A.A. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2012. V. 61. № 3. P. 518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-012-0076-8
- Fox J.M., Dmitrenko O., Liao L.A. et al. // J. Org. Chem. 2004. V. 69. № 21. P. 7317. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049494z
- Lawal M.M., Govender T., Maguire G.E. et al. // J. Mol. Model. 2016. V. 22. P. 235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-016-3084-z
- Costa P., Pilli R., Pinheiro S. et al. The Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds and Derivatives. London: RSC, 2022. 814 p.
- Smith M.B. Organic Chemistry: An Acid-Base Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2023. 726 p.
- Aue D.H., Webb H.M., Bowers M.T. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976. V. 98. № 2. P. 311. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00418a001
- Radisic D., Xu S., Bowen Jr.K.H. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002. V. 354. № 1–2. P. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01470
- Hunter E.P., Lias S.G. // JPCRD. 1998. V. 27. № 3. P. 413. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556018
- Kozhanova E.P., Samuilov Y.D., Samuilov A.Y. // Theor. Chem. Acc. 2023. V. 142. № 12. P. 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-023-03074-w
- Samuilov A.Y., Balabanova F.B., Samuilov Y.D. // Comp. Theor. Chem. 2014. V. 1049. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2014.09.010
- Samuilov A.Y., Balabanova F.B., Samuilov Y.D. // Comp. Theor. Chem. 2015. V. 1067. P. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2015.05.004
- Díaz N., Suárez D., Sordo T.L. // Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001. V. 2001. № 4. P. 793. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099–0690(200102)2001:4<793:: AID-EJOC793>3.0.CO;2-Z
- Ehlers J.E., Rondan N.G., Huynh L.K. et al. // Macromolecules. 2007. V. 40. № 12. P. 4370. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma070423m
- Said R.B., Kolle J.M., Essalah K. et al. // ACS omega. 2020. V. 5. № 40. P. 26125. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03727
- Alvaro C.E.S., Nudelman N.S. // Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2010. V. 42. № 12. P. 735. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20523
- Raspoet G., Nguyen M.T., Kelly S. et al. // J. Org. Chem. 1998. V. 63. № 26. P. 9669. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo980642t
Supplementary files
