Socio-Psychological Aspects of Introducing Mobile Technologies into Clinical Trials
- 作者: Khokhlov A.L.1, Andreenkova A.V.2, Dmitrieva E.V.3, Ilyin M.V.1, Lileeva E.G.1, Chizhov P.A.1, Miroshnikov A.E.1, Pozdnyakov N.O.1
-
隶属关系:
- Yaroslavl State Medical University
- Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI)
- The Moscow Institute of International Affairs MGIMO
- 期: 卷 78, 编号 3 (2023)
- 页面: 194-207
- 栏目: HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT: CURRENT ISSUES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/vramn/article/view/133181
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn2265
- ID: 133181
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Background: High political and economic turbulence, changes in the international relations and cross-national economic ties enhance the demand for developing and launching new pharmacological treatments as a part of nationally independent health care program and import substitution policy. The number of clinical trials is growing rapidly, increasing the need for more effective solutions in organizing these trials — optimizing the time, financial resources and efforts of medical personnel. The global trend of creating a new digital ecosystem in health care also raises the issues of higher patient involvement, taking into account the patient's psychological and physical barriers including the issues of personal data security. Aims: Evaluating the motivation and readiness of current clinical trials participants to switch to mobile technologies and identifying the barriers for these shifts. Method: The survey among 75 participants of clinical trials using offline self-completed questionnaire, data processing using statistical tools for data analysis.
Results: Currently, 56% of respondents who are current participants of traditional medical trials would definitely agree to participate in mobile clinical trials. Compared to the consistency rate between traditional clinical trials estimated as 73%, the shift to a new format will result in 17% additional losses. The serious barrier for participation is the concerns about the security of personal information – it is highly relevant for 37% of respondents and moderately relevant for 44%. The important motivating factor for the participation is the open access to personal medical data - 44% of respondents were highly interested in obtaining this data and 31% are somewhat interested. Conclusion. The results of the pilot study confirmed relatively high readiness of current participants to join mobile clinical trials and use mobile devices and solutions in future trials. However the level of readiness is unequal between different socio-demographic groups. Differentiating parameters are age, former experience of clinical trials and the skills in using digital technologies. Training programs for managers and researchers of clinical trials, provision of devices for non-users, timely technical support during the data collection and transparency in data usages can help to address key issues which slow down the people’s participation in mobile trials.
作者简介
Alexandr Khokhlov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: al460935@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0032-0341
SPIN 代码: 9389-8926
MD, PhD, Professor, Academician of the RAS
俄罗斯联邦, YaroslavlAnna Andreenkova
Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI)
Email: anna.andreenkova@cessi.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6776-7703
SPIN 代码: 5739-0033
PhD in Sociology
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowElena Dmitrieva
The Moscow Institute of International Affairs MGIMO
Email: dmitrieva.ev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0894-4108
SPIN 代码: 2200-8385
PhD in Sociology, Professor
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowMikhail Ilyin
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: michael_ilyin@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6278-374X
SPIN 代码: 2936-4312
MD, PhD, Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, YaroslavlElena Lileeva
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: elileeva2006@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6048-8974
MD, PhD, Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, YaroslavlPetr Chizhov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: p.chizhov63@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7969-6538
SPIN 代码: 6427-4298
MD, PhD, Professor
俄罗斯联邦, YaroslavlAlexei Miroshnikov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: miraleff@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6657-3950
SPIN 代码: 8896-8993
MD, PhD, Assistant Lecturer
俄罗斯联邦, YaroslavlNikolay Pozdnyakov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Email: pozdnyakov.niko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8035-8288
SPIN 代码: 6494-1899
MD, PhD, Assistant Lecturer
俄罗斯联邦, Yaroslavl参考
- Давыдов C.Г. Цифровые компетенции россиян и работа на самоизоляции во время пандемии COVID-19 // Мониторинг общественного мнения. Экономические и социальные перемены. — 2021. — № 2 (163). — С. 403–422. [Davydov CG. Cifrovye kompetencii rossiyan i rabota na samoizolyacii vo vremya pandemii COVID-19. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya. Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2021;2(163):403–422. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1913
- Дмитриева Е.В. Коммуникационное взаимодействие врача и пациента в условиях цифрового здравоохранения // Коммуникология. — 2020. — Т. 8. — № 3. — С. 150–162. [Dmitrieva EV. Patient–Health Care Provider Communication in the Digital Era. Communicology. 2020;8(3):150–162. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.21453/2311–3065-2020-8-3-150–162
- Ладова А.В. Роль фактора доверия в системе «врач–пациент» // Этносоциум и межнациональная культура. — 2016. — № 10. —С. 70–77. [Ladova AV. Rol’ faktora doveriya v sisteme “vrach–pacient”. Etnosocium i mezhnacional’naya kul’tura. 2016;10:70–77. (In Russ.)]
- Ким О.Т., Дадаева В.А., Тельхигова А.А., и др. Мобильные медицинские приложения: возможности, проблемы и перспективы // Профилактическая медицина. — 2021. — Т. 24. — № 7. — С. 96–102. [Kim OT, Dadaeva VA, Telkhigova AA, et al. Mobile medical applications: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2021;24(7):96–102. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20212407196
- Куликов Е.С., Деев И.А., Кобякова О.С., и др. Клиническое исследование глазами пациента: мотивация, ожидания, восприятие // Клиническая медицина. — 2017. — Т. 95. — № 8. — С. 751–757. [Kulikov ES, Deev IA, Kobyakova OS, et al. Clinical trials in russia through patients’ eyes: motivation, expectations, and perceptions. Klin. med. 2017;95(8):751–757. (In Russ.)] doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0023-2149-2017-95-8-751-757
- Хохлов А.Л., Белоусов Д.Ю. Этические аспекты применения программного обеспечения с технологией искусственного интеллекта // Качественная клиническая практика. — 2021. — № 1. — С. 70–84. [Khokhlov AL, Belousov DYu. Ethical aspects of using software with artificial intelligence technology. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2021;1:70–84. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2021-1-70-84
- Anderson K, Burford O, Emmerton L. Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):t0156164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156164.
- Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC; 2017.
- Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Pirogowicz I. Support for e-health services among elderly primary care patients. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(8):696–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0318
- Rai A, Chen L, Pye J, et al. Understanding determinants of consumer mobile health usage intentions, assimilation, and channel preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e149. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2635
- Zarghom S, Di Fonzo D, Leung F-H. Does socioeconomic status affect patients’ ease of use of a touch-screen (iPad) patient survey. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2314
- Penetration rate of smartphones in selected countries 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/539395/smartphone-penetration-worldwide-by-country/
- Sophonhiranak S. Features, Barriers, and Influencing Factors of Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A systematic Review. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021007994
补充文件
