Application of taxonomic analysis in assessing the operational strategy of a span structure

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Aim. Develop a method for comparative analysis of a representative sample of variants of superstructure operation strategies based on a set of heterogeneous features characterizing their reliability and efficiency, as well as to determine the optimal combination of technical and technological solutions to ensure the established design service life.

Materials and methods. One of the main technical and economic indicators when choosing a superstructure operation strategy for bridge structures is the cost of repair and restoration work to achieve the required values of reliability indicators. The choice of rational measures for the operation of bridge superstructures should be based on the use of methods that consider both the diversity and heterogeneity of the factors ensuring their operational reliability, and the stochastic nature of these factors. To solve this problem, a method for assessing the strategy for ensuring the operational reliability of reinforced concrete bridge superstructures is proposed, based on a combination of taxonomic, investment analysis and risk theory methods.

Results. An analytical model has been obtained that allows determining the optimal strategy for the operation of a superstructure based on heterogeneous features characterizing reliability and efficiency, in which the establishment of quantitative reliability indicators is carried out using simulation modeling of the superstructure operation, taking into account the combined effect of uncertainties caused by the natural variability of the strength and deformation parameters of the main beams, the stochastic nature of degradation processes and loading modes.

Conclusion. The presented method for assessing the strategy for operating span structures, as well as the results obtained during its testing, allow operating road construction organizations to determine the required technical and technological solutions to ensure the reliability indicators of span structures, as well as to predict the timing, composition and cost of repair and restoration work during the required service life.

作者简介

G. Ogurtsov

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Email: gleb_l_og@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5183-7420
SPIN 代码: 1150-8781

assistant

俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

N. Ermoshin

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Email: ermonata@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0367-5375
SPIN 代码: 6694-8297

Dr. Sci. (Military), professor

俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

A. Ismailov

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ismailov-aleksei@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9325-2335
SPIN 代码: 1929-1225

Cand. Sci. (Engineering), associate professor

俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

参考

  1. Melehin VB, Magdiev ASh. Methodological foundations for assessing the quality of construction products. Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 2014;4(23):114. (In Russ) EDN: TCFNOB
  2. Spiridonov ES, Dukhovny GS, Logvinenko AA, et al. Scientific approaches to assessing the quality of products for the construction of transport facilities. Bulletin of the Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov. 2009;2:113–116. (In Russ.) EDN: KWCYKL
  3. Makhutov NA, Reznikov DO. Comprehensive analysis of the strength and safety of potentially hazardous facilities subject to uncertainties. Dependability. 2020;20(1):47–56. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-1-47-56 EDN: BZBQMC
  4. Kartopoltsev VМ, Kartopoltsev AV, Alekseev AA. Towards reliability of load-bearing beams of bridges (Tomsk). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2023;25(6):183–195. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-6-183-195 EDN: XACQYX
  5. Kosheleva ZhV, Mikhalevich NV. Calculation of the reliability of a reinforced concrete span bridge during operation. Effective building structures: theory and practice. 2021:71–75. (In Russ.)
  6. Akhmedov ShB, Almenov H, Shozhalilov ShSh, et al. Assessment of the service life of superstructure structures when predicting the durability of reinforced concrete bridges. Scientific Journal of Transport Vehicles and Roads. 2021;1(4):6–8. (In Russ.)
  7. Morozova LN, Parkhomenko VV. Determination of the durability of reinforced concrete road bridges. News of the Automobile and Road Institute. 2022;1(40):41–45. (In Russ.) EDN: OVJDYN
  8. Akhmedov RM, Makhmudov O. Methods of planning and management of bridge repairs. Economy and Society. 2021;11-1(90):774–788. (In Russ.) EDN: QVNNIG
  9. Ogurtsov GL, Ermoshin NA, Biryukov OR. The algorithm of the simulation model implementation and the simulation results. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2025;(73):104–113. (In Russ.). doi: 10.52170/1815-9265_2025_73_104
  10. Li CQ, Ian Mackie R, Lawanwisut W. A risk-cost optimized maintenance strategy for corrosion-affected concrete structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2007;5(22):335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00490.x
  11. Artyukhov AA. Analysis of the activities of the administration of the Leninsky district of the city of Yekaterinburg on the improvement of the territory. GOSREG: State regulation of public relations. 2022;2(40):120–126. (In Russ.) EDN: KXYXUX
  12. Gulitskaya LV, Shimanskaya OS. Actual problems of operation of reinforced concrete slab bridge structures. In: XI Forum of Universities of Engineering and Technology Profile of the Union State: collection of materials, Minsk, December 12-16, 2022 / Belarusian National Technical University. Minsk: BNTU. 2023:108–110. (In Russ.) EDN: ENNCUY
  13. Gulai AV, Zaitsev VM. Synthesis of a taxonomic scheme for identifying the states of complex systems. Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making. 2019;2:84–90. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14357/20718594190208 EDN: ZXFVCJ
  14. Akhrorov ShAU, Ovchinnikov II. Increasing the durability of reinforced concrete bridge structures (primary and secondary protection). Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 2022.3(14):21. (In Russ.) EDN: CSWOIQ
  15. Bastidas-Arteaga E, Schoefs F, Chateauneuf A, et al. Probabilistic evaluation of the sustainability of maintenance strategies for RC structures exposed to chloride ingress. International Journal of Engineering Under Uncertainty: Hazards, Assessment and Mitigation. 2010;1-2(2):61–74.
  16. Bastidas-Arteaga E. Contribution for sustainable management of reinforced concrete structures subject to chloride penetration [dissertation] Nantes; 2010.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Tree of features of a span structure

下载 (118KB)

版权所有 © Ogurtsov G.L., Ermoshin N.A., Ismailov A.M., 2025

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可

link to the archive of the previous title

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).